Will Jewish Zionists Airbrush the Iraq Inquiry?

This comment has been removed by a moderator. Please review our posting policy and help us moderate abusive comments by reporting them.

Most clearly the thread is antisemtic (but MPAC UK don't like you pointing it out).

Israel was AGAINST the Iraq War and Sharon told Bush it wasn't wise. That the USA would get bogged-down in Iraq.

In order to qualify why the thread is racist then consider this: Over 250 Muslims have been convicted of terrorism related offences in the UK. A constant theme of explanation by the Muslim Community is "Its the War in Iraq". On the same basis as MPAC UK "outing" Jews serving on the enquiry then would it be acceptable to suggest that Muslim be barred from serving on the enquiry?

Surely, its the same analogy as the basis for the thread.

Why doesn't MPAC UK like the obviousl and logical mirror?

"The Mail on Sunday can disclose that Attorney General Lord Goldsmith wrote the letter to Mr Blair in July 2002 - a full eight months before the war - telling him that deposing Saddam Hussein was a blatant breach of international law."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231746/Secret-letter-reveal-new...

Does not compute! Does not Compute! Does not .......................

(a comment on the racialisation of the enuiry panel. You started it!)

They still try and defend this decision to have these 2 boys on the inquiry, oh yes but of course there is only 1 reason they are there .. to protect israel's interests of course... no no we must keep them there for the interest of israel..forget all the millions ...YES THATS RIGHT MILLIONS... of ppl that have died due to Zio politics... no problem... israel all the way by watever means right?? it must be because the Zio Jews (not Real Jews) dnt actually believe in G-D He is just a metaphor isnt he? So No one is really going 2 help anyone other than ourselves?? In that sense Zio Jews are doing the best arent they???

Yes, Jews will airbrush the Iraq Inquiry because they all look like wobbled rats.

You really are a bunch of jew-hating odious little impotents.

The Nazis didn't manage it and neither will you.

Horrible people.

wow, and you think people are paid by the 'Zionists' to comment here?

You really are fucked.

I'm posting here for the first time as I've just noticed your anti-semitic crap. I'm English and have no religion but I hate fascist scum like you. This country fought long and hard in 39-45 to rid the world of anti-semites. It's a shame you're getting noisy again.

Interesting how these racists are now ashamed to be Jewish and claiming other peoples identities. You are correct in "English" people having paid much blood against Nazis, lets hope you do not contemplate and pussy foot around the "H" issue alone to belittle everybody else.

One of the major problems is debating the Iraq issues is the paucity of debate in the media and the failure to explore the regional drivers. Various opundits can argue endlessly whether Sharon said / meant this or that.
However we do know that the constrainst that the USA & UK placed upon themselves upon invading Iraq, created a scenario where Iran and to a lesser extent Syria accurately identified that they could flood the country with arms and money to destabilise Iraq. The Iran / Syria alliance is fearful of any rise in democracy in the region and seeks to undermine it. Iran particularly seeks to promote itself and seek popularity by appealling to the profound sense of humiliation & loss of status across the Muslim world.
The USA & UK were wrong in believing that simply by removing the Baath regime that in its place a form of democracy would spring up without robust defence of Iraq's sovereign integrity. This would have meant being willing to make Iran & Syria pay for their actions to destabilise Iraq, which they they were not prepared to do. USA & UK demonstrated that they lacked a popular mandate.
regardless about how one feels about Sharon, his statements have to be understood in relation to the realities in the region and a highly nuanced understanding of regional dynamics. Had the USA & UK been explcitily willing to strike at Iran & Syria's infrastructure to deter destabilisation there would not have been the arming of the Shiite and Baathist militias that resulted in hundreds of thousands of Muslims being killed and maimed.
It may have been better to leave Saddam Hussein in place. But as sanctions against Iraq further weakened it, both Iran & Syria would exploited the situation to undermine their enemy, Iraq. Let us not forget that Iran has consistently sought to assert its pre-Islamic regional dominance. Behind the rhetoric stands the fantasies of a re-assertion of the ancient Persian Empire that dominated from the Mediterannean Eastwards steadily cultivated through the national legends and evocation of past glories. But in that Iran does not differ much from other regional states - i.e. Saddams fantasies of Babylon.