A War Against Islam

Bin Laden makes threats about new attacks in the name of Islam (Al jazeera English, today) and you ask why there is a war on Islam? Ok then let's me be plain. Biblical Christianity will continue to be embraced and propagated if Muslims like Bin Laden continue to threaten, and Islam continues to try and impose it's self on the world. That plain enough for you? We will not sit back and let Islam impose it's self on us just because Muslims think we in the west and the world must fight fair, give Muslims a break, and because they think they are victims and are owed. If you think so you can all go to hell..

Even if MPACUK and Muslims oppose Biblical Christianity being used against Islam, the argument is academic, because it will be used anyway no matter what is said or done by Muslims and MPACUK. So do what you want, but the reality of Biblical Christianity's use will still be here at the end of the day even if it is unfair to Muslims, and that Muslims consider themselves victims and must be allowed the opportunity to spread islam without the use of the military or religion by anyone else. against them. Get use to it.

PS If you think by being political active muslims will get government's to control Biblical Christianity I suggest you forget it because no government has and no government will. I give you the governments of China,North Korea, Vietnam, and Iran as examples of failures. Plus they have extensive military power to booth and they still failed to crush Biblical Christianity.(-:

Wahine who did Jews slaughter that christians gassed and burnt 6 million of them.
Bush the warmongering criminals has said god told me to free the iraqis ,so he did by killing and maiming millions of them.
christian soldiers wrote on bombs pray to Allah if he does not listen the try Jesus,the one side has been engaged in a religious war against Muslims ,the muslims are led by stooges and vassals ,that is why this has not turned into world war three ,otherwise the result would be worse than ww2.
individual loonies are portrayed as Representatives of Muslims, yet Bush and Blair were voted into power by tens of millions of christians even after they knew they had lied to attack iraq, in which millions of iraqis had been killed-maimed or made refugees,so the world know who the Real followers of satanic forces are, they are not the ones who defend their homes-lands and dignity, they are the ones who attack-kill-torture and rape the people who defend their lands.

“By way of deception we do war” is mossads slogan.

There is a concerted campaign against Islam.

It takes place by means of direct military action, or covert methods involving clandestine subterfuge (Iran), media warfare (sections of Islamaphobe press) or cultural brainwashing.

The izzies have even been brazen enough to admit that they are fighting a jewish jihad against Islam.

Bush said that "God" told him to invade Afghanistan.

Blair joined him in prayer sessions in Crawford, before Campbell refuted it with "We don't do God".

Blackwater/Xe mercenaries think they are the reincarnation of the templar knights, and killing muslims is their calling.

Izzies have rabbi's in their death squads, telling them they are doing gods work by killing muslim women and children.

How much more blatant do you want it?

http://hotterthanapileofcurry.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/israel-admits-to-...

Just on the picture in the corner of blair, blair made a mistake getting involved in iraq but lets also recall that he has helped muslims in sierra leone, kosovo and afghanistan.

This man has more in common with Judaism. It is totally different from Islam, Christianity or the other normal faith where humanity and equity is vital. Instead, Judaism is exclusionary, and not based upon the virtues of an individual but the a contract "God" made with them when they self declared themselves Aryans or "Chosen People".

That is why Phoney Blair wasted Parliament time cos he could not care less because the "contract" was more important to him than anything else. I wish the Catholic church excommunicates him 21 century style, I am sure they will gain more friends from the publicity whether good or bad.

AHS2's analysis is flawed because it fails to acknowledge that the Ottoman Khalifat was teetering on collapse from the end of the 18th C. Belated and inadequate reforms were implemented under the broad title of Tanzimat. The Ottoman Empire was in competetion with other empires and they exploited the immense resentment of Ottoman rule amongst primarily Christian communities. As the Ottoman's like other Muslim rulers failed to invest in education & technology these empires were able to take the Ottoman Empire aparrt piece by piece. In the Maghreb, piracy in the Mediterranean and raids along the Spanish, French and Italian coasts for slaves resulted in the French taling the initiative to end the situation and make the seaways safe for trade. Although they had no initial plans for colonialisation, once they seized control they were reluctant to relinquish it. In the Levant there was a particualr issue that the feudal ruling class and its allies relied prior to Tanzimat upon exploiting the Christian and Jewish communities and levying a vast array of taxes and duties. This provided no incentive for the ruling elites to invest in themselves or the region. Once Tanzimat ended this source of money they responded by selling land to Zionists. They also aspired to reverse political developments and reinstate the pre-Tanzimat status. This second issue is common across much of the Muslim world. This reactionary stance has a number of impacts; 1. It inherently alienates the dominant West. 2. It conflicts with modern international values 3. It renders the Muslim world weak as it fails to look forward and thus fails to address the problems of the present & future.
Behind much of the rhetoric is the message to the West "Go away and leaves us alone" implying that without western influence that problems will be solved. yet the same pundits that express this view demand that the west share the benefits of its successful economic / political development with the Muslim world, and demands the protections from the West that the Muslim world will not provide its own inhabitants. The issue of the UNCHR highlights the disconnect between prevailing values between the international community and the Muslim community. Muslims in UK demand that Muslims are afforded all the rights espoused by UNHCR but refuse to condemn the denial of the same rights in the Muslim states. In the same manner Muslims and others decry Israel for discriminatory practices in relation to Israeli Palestinians citing apartheid but conveniently ignore that Islam itself promotes an even more extreme form of apartheid.
Belatedly the Ottomans realised that the inequality within Sharia law weakened the state, but acted too late to reverse the impacts. Too many people here are failing to understand and learn the same lesson. The conflict between East & West, Islam v Judeo-Christianity is a continuum extanding back over centuries. Both sides have to end it and simply blaming the west will not do.

When one zionist deviant congratulates another then you know they have lost the argument.
Wahine read your own comment i think you called it KARMA, Q being a Zionist deviant you are bound by habit, but sometimes do check before commenting ,check wahines blog he stated muslims are being killed because its called KARMA.
So the question was to the point who did jews slaughter for 6 million of them to be gassed and burnt.

Q the zionist deviant are you wahine that you wish to answer on his behalf.
The question was in direct response to wahines justification for the murder of muslim by calling it KARMA.
Either state that you wahine or let wahine answer the question,as a Zionist deviant you have done everything possible to justify the murder-torture-occupation-sodomy-rape and daily humiliation Palestinians in their ow homes and lands for the last 60 years.
Your hatred of muslims is terminal.

Great article!