Christian Terrorists Strike Again

A sarcastic person has a superiority complex that can be cured only by the honesty of humility

Parody is homage gone sour.

So the catholics who killed because they wanted to be part of catholic Ireland was not religious based terrorism,loyalist Protestants wanting to be with protestant britain was not protestant based terrorism it was all political not religious.
By that very logic Palestinians-Iraqis-afghans-Chechen's-kashmiris and others are fighting to liberate heir lands,so why are their faiths mentioned when they are fighting to liberate their lands.
Either they are nationalists fighting for freedom like the i.r.a or they are religious terrorists like the i.r.a and u.d.a.
only hypocrites try to defend christian terror while calling others terrorist by their faith.

@Dingwallman well said
@Shaan valid point

But why does terror always have to religiously motivated.

I consider myself as a true Infidel as I have no religious preference and I am proud of this fact.

I may live in a country whose values were built on Christianity and buy into the commercial aspect of this.

But I look at religion as an outdated means of controlling the masses, explaining issues that humanity have not yet understood and a base to build a working society.

How many people die in the name of religion and why? You may say I will go to hell, but which hell, There are so many to choose from. And to be honest I don’t care.

I however will never be little any mans religion, as it is your right to believe in what you wish.

I believe what is happening in Palestine and Chechnya is wrong. Iraq is a disaster that should never of happened they should have been left alone to deal with their dictator themselves, But I’m not sure about Afghan. The idea's of shia law are, as whole sound but with my (self admitting) limited knowledge I think it was instigated with terror and the way it policed was wrong i.e. education of females no music etc.

If i have the right to be educated (obviously not to the high standards of some of my fellow commenters) then why not the females of the Afghan people. I dont belive the war there is against Musilms but prehaps the evil people who ensured thier country was and remained stuck in the dark ages.

That is only my view and wish no offence to anybody.

Shaan
So at this time when when the Afghan Goverment said
"we are in war we cannot afford to set up schools with our limited resources and protect them"
I assume this was before the so called allied invasion so who were they at war with, because it is my understanding that the after the russians left and the taliban took control there was a limited peace in the area.
And if the country was as safe and crime free as you suggest then why would they need to protect them

And surley the best way to increase the production and the resources of a country would be the investment of these limited resources through health, education and infastructure. Is this not the main areas that have been lacking within afghan.

The.Infidel just to point out to you,after the soviets left it was the northern alliance which was in control of afghan not the Islamic emirate of afghan.
The Taliban movement started in 1996 after travellers were robbed by bandits, it took them a few years to gain control over 85% afghan they only had 1 or 2 years of control over the majority of afghan when they bought opium production down-rapes-murders and robberies were all cut by half in 1 or 2 year time.
if the islamic emirate had been allowed to run affairs in peaceful stable manner today afghan would be a more prosperous and safe place.it was foreign terrorism which destroyed afghan and has kept afghan a ruined nation.

Infidel please dont try and get your information about Afghanistan from Shan, he is a Taliban supporter and his opinion is therefore biased, i on the other-hand am a supporter of the Afghan people and therefore wants whats best for them, unlike Sham up above.

The truth is most Afghans look at the period of Taliban rule as a brutal time, they feel that the 2001 invasion was justified and that things are better now. The majority of Afghans do not approve of the Taliban and do not wish for NATO troops to leave yet.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_01_10_afghanpoll.pdf

http://www.glevumassociates.com/files/AfghanistanElectionSurveyDosVersio...

The removal of the Taliban has according to a John Hopkins Survey (the same group that did the lancet iraq survey) found that the removal of the Taliban has saved over 40,000 more lives per year.

http://jeffweintraub.blogspot.com/2007/04/infant-mortality-in-afghanista...

Oxfam also did a survey which showed that life in post Taliban Afghanistan is far less violent than the Taliban and pre-Taliban years

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/18_11_09_oxfam_afghan.pdf

The link also describes how brutal Taliban rules was, more people were imprisoned and tortured under Taliban rule than under Soviet or Warlord rule, Taliban era also injured more people, destroyed more land and homes than the 1992-96 period, more people were robbed in the taliban period than in the civil war period.
Overall most Afghans consider the Taliban to have been more harmful than the civil war period.

UNICEF has also reported that there has been a 25% decrease in the infant mortality rate since 2001.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-01/22/content_7474608.htm

Shans leaves out a lot of important information regarding the Taliban and drugs, for the first few years the Taliban used drugs to raise cash for themselves, then they cut back, why?, not because after years of dealing they suddenly developed a conscience, they did it to lower the amount of heroin on the market, therefore causing a spike in prices, they then happily dealt the heroin that was previously harvested and got a nice bit of cash for it, odd how shan left out this little detail.

Keeping it real!

Shaan I need to address the following statement that you made in one of your previous posts.

"So the catholics who killed because they wanted to be part of catholic Ireland was not religious based terrorism,loyalist Protestants wanting to be with protestant britain was not protestant based terrorism it was all political not religious".

The catholics (IRA) who killed wanted to create a united socialist republic not a united catholic state. Sinn Fein is a marxist group not a catholic party. Furthemore, many of the earliest advocates of a united Ireland were in fact protestants i.e Charles Parnell.

Moses led his people to invade and colonise someone else's land.
Jesus offered up his body
Mohammed grasped the sword and laid seige to the dissenters.

So which prophet was more peaceable and which inspired violence?

Oh islam you are a delight to me, your pleasures are mine. Let the hand of the pious not be chained up in asserting peity upon the unbeliever or dissenter.

Please allow me to introduce myself, I am a man of wealth & taste.

Jesus offered up his body we are told by people,yet did anyone bother to ask him if he offered his body or was he tortured and crucified like a criminal.
Since we are told Jesus offered up his body to be tortured and killed is that why so called christian have been killing and maiming millions in iraq here and now.
The jews will tell you the reality of Christians not the propaganda that is spread around and i watched the history of christianity in which they showed how jews have been massacred by christians for the last 2 thousand years.

Factually correct millions have been killed or maimed under christian occupation of Iraq ,according to international law the occupiers is responsible for the wellbeing of the occupied.
Those who work for the americans terrorists are not muslims but traitors and collaborators.
Bombs placed in markets and streets were carried out by American and british black ops,as shown by the capture of british blacks ops operatives dressed as Arabs with bombs and timers in their vehicle,when they were arrested the british army attacked the police station and Freed them.
There is only one lesson to be learnt might is right.

Factually correct millions have been killed or maimed under christian occupation of Iraq

I see that you are back-tracking from your original statement that christians murdered and maimed millions, good lad.

Those who work for the americans terrorists are not muslims but traitors and collaborators.
Bombs placed in markets and streets were carried out by American and british black ops,as shown by the capture of british blacks ops operatives dressed as Arabs with bombs

LOL! Ah Shan your frail mind cannot cope with the truth so it starts to believe in conspiracy theories, the insurgents were indeed Muslim, fanatical ones and they themselves decided to kill innocent normal Muslims for their own reasons.

There is only one lesson to be learnt might is right.

Actually the weaker have been seen as the ones who are right on numerous occasions

The british black op caught dressed as Arabs with bombs and timers is not conspiracy it is reality,

As ive stated before iraqi insurgents were behind iraqi insurgent attacks, claiming otherwise is delusional and nothing more than a conspiracy theory from a man who gets his information from banners:)

the ultimate lesson is might is right

Maybe in your warped view but for most normal people right is right

the time is not far for the boot to be on the other foot.

Lol, your showing yourself to be a small minded bigot wishing for pain and misery on others, not surprising from a man who defends Saddams genocide against northern iraqis as security maintenence

christians have killed and maimed millions in iraq that is a factual reality

Actually according to an org which you have claimed to be reliable this is not true, the majority of deaths have been due to iraqi on iraqi violence