Fri, 10/09/2010 - 9:47am
Bismillah

Eid Mubarak from MPACUK

Mosque Exposes Khalid Mahmood's False Claims!

Khalid Mahmood WAR MONGER!

North London Central Mosque have recently come out to condemn Khalid Mahmood and expose him. Below is the full statement made by the mosque earlier this week:

We wish to put the record straight following false claims made by Khalid Mahmood MP for Birmingham Perry Bar, a former trustee of North London Central Mosque (NLCM). Until this week we intended to remain silent in the face of his provocative and ill-informed statements in the media but now we must speak out to defend the good name of our mosque, our community and our partners in Islington - Jeremy Corbyn, our MP, politicians and officials, police officers and faith and community leaders.

Equally, important, we must highlight the increased risk of Islamophobic attacks that we now face as a result of Khalid’s Mahmood’s false claims and the climate of anti-Muslim sentiment he is helping to stir up against NLCM.

A dignified silence was our preferred response so why this change of policy now?

On Monday (19 July) Khalid Mahmood took his false claims against NLCM to a new and dangerous level. He repeated a false claim linking us to suspected Al-Qaeda terrorists, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and Anwar al-Awlaki.

Later that night the mosque was attacked and violated by two men who were captured on our CCTV cameras sticking a pig’s head on the mosque gates. We have every confidence that Islington police will do their utmost to identify and bring to justice the two men seen photographing themselves proudly in front of their gross insult to our mosque and to our religion which we hold dear. Then it will possible to investigate the motivation for this despicable but all too common hate-crime.

Like many other mosque’s in the UK we face an ongoing threat of Islamophobic hate-crimes of this kind that are exacerbated by claims such as Khalid Mahmood’s that falsely link us to Al-Qaeda.

That risk is probably greater at NLCM because for so many years the name ‘Finsbury Park Mosque’ (NLCM is our official name) was accurately associated with the convicted extremist Abu Hamza and during his control – which coincides with some of Khalid Mahmood’s tenure as trustee - the mosque was regularly targeted by violent extremist thugs from the far right. If Khalid Mahmood had paid attention then he would realise now that his ill-informed comments are likely to prompt the English Defence League and associated Islamophobes to target NLCM once again and in the way they have targeted other mosques deemed to be ‘extremist’ or ‘terrorist’ in recent months.

Since we took control of the mosque from Abu Hamza’s supporters in February 2005 the mosque has been firebombed and the recipient of hate mail that is motivated by anti-Muslim hatred. If Khalid Mahmood had ever shown any interest in NLCM affairs when he was a trustee he would be aware of this and the risk of inflaming hostility by linking us to suspected Al-Qaeda terrorists now.

Instead, in truth, Khalid Mahmood was never more than a ghost trustee, never present when he was needed, least of all when the mosque was in the hands of Abu Hamza’s supporters and the risk of support for Al-Qaeda was real.

Now, disingenuously, Khalid Mahmood claims to seek “reassurances” from the Home Secretary “about the extent and nature of “deradicalisation” of NLCM “after the expulsion of Abu Hamza and his crew [in February 2005].”

His claims are made in the Spectator:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/6153943/mahmood-seeks-answers.thtml

And embroidered on Harry’s Place:
http://hurryupharry.org/2010/07/20/finsbury-park-mosque-abdulmutalab-awlakilink/
http://hurryupharry.org/2010/07/20/finsbury-park-mosque-abdulmutalab-awlaki-link/

If Khalid Mahmood had ever attended a trustee’s meeting at NLCM he would know that NLCM enjoyed a proud record of success for the period 2005 – 2010 in tackling the legacy of violent extremism inherited from Abu Hamza and his supporters.

That success was celebrated at a fifth anniversary event attended by our many partners on 5 February 2010:
http://nlcentralmosque.com/images/press_release/Press_release150220.pdf

Instead Khalid Mahmood failed to attend trustee meetings and was dismissed in accordance with NLCM trust regulations as approved by the Charity Commission.

This is an important point and a chance to put the record straight because Khalid Mahmood falsely claims he resigned as NLCM trustee. In fact, his tenure as trustee can be summarised as a consistent failure to do anything to help the mosque and its local community.

According to the Spectator, Khalid Mahmood, has put down a significant question for Home Secretary, Theresa May:

'Mr Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham, Perry Barr): To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent reports she has received on (a) investigations undertaken by members of the US Congress and (b) materials held by the US Department of Justice on the attendance of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab at any events addressed by Anwar al-Awlaki at North London Central Mosque since 2005; and what assessment her Department has made of the role of the North London Central Mosque in deradicalisation in the content of her Department's review of each strand of the Prevent stategy.'

The Spectator report continues, “Mahmood quotes from a recent report on National Public Radio in the US on the Christmas Day bomber: 'Intelligence officials say the mosque figures in the Abdulumttaalab case, too. In tracing the path of Abdulmutallab, intelligence officials say he apparently attended a sermon at the Finsbury Park Mosque in the fall of 2006 or 2007. He went to listen to the man who would become his mentor and perhaps his al-Qaida recruiter: Awlaki.'

According to The Spectator report “Mahmood notes how Peter King, the ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee has requested more information on this question in a letter to Eric Holder, the US attorney general”.

In repeating this false claim Khalid Mahmood reveals the same laziness that characterised his role as NLCM trustee. If he had bothered to listen to the news report in question he would have released straight away that the reporter hopelessly confuses NLCM with another mosque in London. Rather comically, the US reporter’s lack of basic London geography can be heard in the introduction to her report:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123894237

We hasten to add that allegations against another mosque in London are likely to be robustly and properly defended by the trustees in question. We certainly do not wish to give such claims any credence. Our purpose is to show that claims repeated by Khalid Mahmood that suspected Al-Qaeda, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attended a talk by Anwar al-Awlaki at NLCM in the fall of 2006 or 2007 do not relate to NLCM at all.

Let us be perfectly clear: neither Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab nor Anwar al-Awlaki has ever been invited to attend NLCM since we took charge of the mosque in February 2005. We can be certain that neither man has been given a platform at the mosque in any form and in the case of Anwar al-Awlaki we can be confident that he would not have been able to enter the mosque without his presence being brought to our attention and we do not think that he visited the UK between 2006 and 2007 because he was in jail as mentioned before.

In his eagerness to denigrate NLCM Khalid Mahmood has repeated an American reporter’s mistake based on a failure to grasp basic London geography. It would be uncharitable but not unreasonable to suggest that Khalid Mahmood does not know whereabouts in London Finsbury Park is any more than the US reporter. It is certainly difficult to find anyone who has ever seen him in Finsbury Park. In that respect at least he has something in common with Anwar al-Awlaki and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

Khalid Mahmood needs to understand that his false claims may have the unintended consequence of boosting support for violent extremism against NLCM which in turn will fuel violent extremism of the kind that used to be fostered within the mosque when Abu Hamza’s supporters were in charge.

We therefore call on Khalid Mahmood to retract his false claims and call on the Home Secretary and the Commissioner of Police to vindicate and acknowledge our sincere and effective efforts to tackle violent extremism in Finsbury Park and beyond and to help reduce the threat of Islamophobic attacks on mosques and Muslim communities in the UK.

In the meantime we will continue to work closely with our partners in Islington to ensure that Finsbury Park remains a hostile environment for violent extremists of both kinds.

North London Central Mosque

Share or Bookmark this article

Understand more...

14 comments

 

Shame on the Muslims of Perry Barr ...

.. whom voted Khalid Mahmood back in power - this just shows how blind and backward they are by voting in a useless fool back into office to represent them. They have done a disservice to themselves.

 

He is a Labour MP

And as such is a Member of Parliament. He was not voted in by only Muslims and he was certainly not voted in to represent a bleeeding Mosque or Muslims.

Do any of you understand the political system here?

 

he wasnt voted in to spread

he wasnt voted in to spread lies to align to the political narritive either...

all politicians must be held to account and this is what the mosque is doing...comepletely democratic might i add

 

MPACUK is truly the shield of the ummah.

MPACUK did an excellent job of exposing Khalid Mahmood and put him up against a real fight by doing a campaign against him this elections. Well Done MPACUK.

You did what this crapy Mosque did not do. These Mosques only come out to expose when he sells them out but MPACUK exposed him for selling out the ummah years ago.

MPACUK is truly the shield of the ummah.

 

Good Grief!

At the risk of sounding like im anti MPAC UK(which im not!)why go around making baseless and nonsensical statements about "MPACUK is truly the shield of the ummah"

All MPAC UK are really doing is highlighting what is REAL news for muslims.As you can see a majority of muslims are too wayward to even care.

You really have NOT defended or shielded the UMMAH at all from anything,just cried(SHRIEKED) the loudest to get their attention.

I hope this wasn't offensive,cos i know you have your uses..

 

Getting rid of Zionist MP's

Getting rid of Zionist MP's isn't a Shield?

Staring the boycott Israeli campaign isn't shielding the Palestinians?

Holding Mosques to account so that they empower the ummah isn't a Shield?

Media Campaigns, and alerts?

come on... get real.

 

A measly grain of sand.............

A measly grain of sand.............of the worlds deserts and beaches doesn't amount to much really.

The Quraan says.."THOSE WHO IMITATE A PEOPLE ARE OF THEM"

The module MPAC UK uses is imitating the the KUFFAR(I didn't and wouldn't say you are kuffar) ie.mimicing AIPAC near enough down to the T.Even the name!PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITEE?

Using ,what can only be described as WESTERN inspired ideologies to further their cause.The cause itself HIGHLY NOBLE and inspiring,the method however is another thing altogether.

BROTHERS & SISTERS please REVERT back to the already complete(and perfect) DEEN.May Allah AzWajjal give us all Hidayah

 

Hazarat Musa held the Pharoah

Hazarat Musa held the Pharoah to account did he not? there are so many exmaples in islam where a muslim went to a leader and held to account in some way or another.....and that was done through force of argument and with the people who agreed with it....

what is the difference of what MPACUK are doing?

 

Please do quote the Quran without understanding the context

I'm not convinced that your argument is valid. Using your logic, we should not fly in planes, sit in cars or watch TV - all inventions of the kuffar.

Your point about the 'measly grain of sand'. Again, a very poor shot and not thought through.

Slick, Muslims have less than a grain of sand that will stand up for them. This grain of sand (from mpacuk) is worth much more than a mountain of gold in the context of whole the world exists today.

We have 'leaders' in Islamic nations that should speak up for Muslims, but they are too busy enjoying the decadent ways of the kuffar - perhaps this is what the Quran refers to in your quote above?

 

This just shows that the

This just shows that the movement is picking up momentum and that people are starting to realise why they must get proactive in politics and why they must voice out

and as usual MPACUK are at the front of that

 

I suppose the RSPCA could

I suppose the RSPCA could investigate whether the pig was slaughtered in the correct way but unless they broke in I can't see what they would charge them with.

I'm not sure if being equipped to, or insulting or ridicule of islam is a crime in this country yet however much some would wish it.

 

This comment has been removed

This comment has been removed by a moderator. Please review our posting policy and help us moderate abusive comments by reporting them.

 

Hey, maybe you will be

Hey, maybe you will be rounded up all through europe and gassed, shot and be able to claim REAL victim status instead of having to pretend.

I would advise you to be careful what you wish for though because things have a way of coming back on you. My old mom always says that you know, and her mom before her and so on and so on!

Hey ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? Wonderful story and soooo true.

Have a nice day!

 

Methinks you do protest too

Methinks you do protest too much.....

He poses a question, and the evident panic on your part should alrm us all. Surely if there are allegations being made, then the sooner they are cleared up the better for all. If these issues of extremism ni longer figure at the mosque due your management then what have you to fear, any investigation will show you to be the kind of people the community needs.
Or is there something that you fear may be uncovered.

Please register or login to post a comment.
Empowerment through political participation

Recent comments

Copyright MPACUK © 2000-2009. All rights reserved

"Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character."

— Margaret Chase Smith