The Zionist Terror Training Manual

What a dirty bunch of baby killers.

Zionism = Racism
Zionists = Scum

There are clear distinctions made in the Glorious Quran between devout jews and zionists. The worst enemy of the prophetic jewish faith is the nationalist, racist and colonialist logic of tribal zionism, born of the nationalism, racism and colonialism of 19th century Europe. This logic inspired all the colonialisms of the West and all its wars of one nationalism against another. There is no future or security for the zionist state and no peace in the Middle East unless the zionist state becomes "dezionized" and returns to the faith of Abraham, which is the spiritual, fraternal and common heritage of the three revealed religions: Islam, Judaism and Christianity.

"You will find that the worst enemies of the believers are the jews and the idol worshipers. And you will find that the closest people in friendship to the believers are those who say, 'We are Christian.' This is because they have priests and monks among them, and they are not arrogant" (The Glorious Quran - 5:82).

"Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth." (The Glorious Quran - 7:159).

"We broke them (jews) up into sections on this earth. There are among them some that are the righteous, and some that are the opposite. We have tried them with both prosperity and adversity: in order that they might turn (to Us)... As to those who hold fast by the Book and establish regular Prayer, never shall We suffer the reward of the righteous to perish." (The Glorious Quran - 7:168-170).

Gay Man - this is what we're saying; the two-state solution is just another zionist myth given the ever increasing jewish settlement expansion swallowing up more and more Palestinian Land with no signs of mitigation. Moreover, the Palestinians will never recognize the zionist state, so the two-state solution actually solves nothing.

The zionist state actually approves Palestinian Autonomy but not in "Statehood" form. At least, not until a commitment to recognising the zionist states' own statehood could be squeezed from the Palestinian negotiators. You see, Statehood carries with it all kinds of international rights. For instance, a fledgeling Palestinian state might feel inclined to cut a deal with Palestinian Hamas sponsors, Iran. A deal that would see Iran’s Revolutionary Guards massing on the zionist states' border, and barely needing a missile delivery system.

The fact of the matter is that all zionists share the same racist, fascist ideology, whether territorialist or expansionist. zionism is a nationalist movement specifically for Jews, excluding all others, and attributing an inferior status to members of non-jewish groups with biology dictating immigration and citizenship, so by its very nature it is racist. All zionists thus trace back to this very nature. How can one claim that zionists wish for peace whilst they continue with ethnic cleansing, building apartheid walls and jewish settlement expansion? Is this what you call looking for a peaceful solution? Muslims, being by their very nature and definition peaceful loving people, rightfully support any devout jew that supports a peaceful solution, however zionists by their very nature and behaviour are terrorists, no matter what label of convenience they wish to hide behind, and can thus be comfortably categorised in the same sense.

The world is under no more of a moral or legal obligation to maintain zionism (in any way, shape or form) in the zionist state than it was to maintain apartheid in South Africa, The Palestinian people’s right to freedom and human rights override whatever rights the zionist state thinks it has to remain jewish. Period.

Gay Man - I do not believe that you have managed to establish a counter argument. I also do not believe that you have sufficiently grasped my contention that zionism is indeed racism. What I do believe is that you have chosen to concede your former statements and have now chosen to base your statements around paraphrased contentions, allbeit flawed like the former.

You say that "Some zionists are racists, but that doesn't mean zionism is racism". zionism by its very nature and definition is racist. As a result of this, ALL zionists are racist. Your statement pertains to an oxymoron whereby you cannot be peaceful and a zionist at the same time. You have failed miserably to refute my argument.

Again, all of your statements are outrageously flawed. Firstly, a Muslim racist is an oxymoron, since the definition of the verb Muslim is one who performs Islam, and Islam strongly opposes racism (in the Glorious Quran), it is therefore impossible to be a Muslim and a racist simultaneously, you're either one or the other.

Secondly Islam cannot be racist, as Islam is a religion, not a race, which is a fact. Islamophobia on the other hand is racist due to the very racist nature of the phenomena.

Again, the statement "Muslim Terrorist" is also an oxymoron for the same reason as above. It is impossible to be a Muslim and a terrorist at the same time. If you're a terrorist, you cannot call yourself a Muslim as the Glorious Quran calls these type of people "hypocrites". .

I have already proved why a two-state solution will not work. The only hope for Palestinians is to rid zionism, that is plagued with racism. Only then can the Palestinians and the jews establish peace.

Zionism is Racism. I guarantee that you will not be able to prove me wrong. Period.

It is always important to call a spade a spade. The latest racist filth as far as the UK is concerned is the anti-Alisha Dixon campaign from only Jewish personnel using and abusing their responsibilities in the media.

Just because Dixon took the job of a Jewish women, they consider it utterly humiliating for a Jewish person to loose their job to a black person.

If such people would display such filth over a BBC role, imagine their hatred against everybody else as we continue with our lives unmolested by them.

The zionist bloggers are being given a list of talking points and debate techniques:

1) Always remind people that zionists feel bad when civilians are slaughtered.

2) Let people know that even though we are superior to everyone we are still nice guys and peaceful.

3) The Holocaust is your best friend.

4) When running low on cogent arguments call your opponent an anti-semite.

5) Check your responses for spelling and count the number of times you used # 3 and 4 (once is never enough).

6) Repeat and repeat historical lies as often as possible - this is how true history is written.

The reality is that Zionism is Racism. A reactionary movement, used as a means of justifying Jewish Diaspora to Palestine, assuaging European culpability regarding the Holocaust, and creation of a Western “satellite” in the Middle East.

I think we have seen quite enough overt anti-Semitism on this site to conclude that for many of MPACuk's regular contributors Zionism is simply shorthand for Judaism.

The contributions on this thread are a disgrace.

Not the old anti-semitism nonsense again. Why can't you people just say Israel is a piece of shit, and lets try to fix it.

In order to clear up any confusion, the problem is simple: Founding a modern state on a single ethnic or religious identity in a territory that is ethnically and religiously diverse leads inexorably either to politics of exclusion (think of the over one hundred square-mile prison camp that Gaza has become) or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. Put simply, the problem is zionism.

Your statement that "some zionists are not racists" is irrelevant and does not detract from my initial argument because I'm not talking about individual zionists, but rather the movement or ideology itself. What I'm saying is that zionism (as a national jewish movement or ideology) is racism.

If you say that "some zionists are good" or that "not all zionists are bad", which I strongly reject anyway, but this does not take anything away from the fact that the zionist political movement is racist.

To analogize, If you, for example, contend that nazism is racism, and I attempt to refute that argument with the statement "some nazis are good", this still doesn't refute the argument that nazism is racism. I would need to explain in sufficient detail WHY nazism is not racism to stand even a chance of refuting the contention.

You CANNOT refute that the zionist political movement is racist because this is a well-known fact with tons of solid corroborated evidence.

Prove me wrong if you dare.

Agreed, this gayman is just another nutcase zionist who doesn't even have a clue. it's most likely an abused teen-age rebellious armchair warrior that missed out on his usual stuffing so he's taking it out on MPAC lol!

This is not a modern phenomenon.

Founding any state on a single religious or ethnic identity in a territory that is ethnically or religously diverse leads inexorably to the politics of exclusion or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. That is correct.

Well, this is precisely what the Prophet PBUH did in 7th century Arabia - those who submitted to Islam were spared, the rest were either killed or expelled. And there were many Jewish and Christian settlements in Arabia that disappeared into the ether. So, yes, it can happen

Aceh Province in Indonesia did the same in this century and quite frankly I don't think the illiterate population of such a backward little state would even know what a Zionist was.

I doubt very much if anyone had heard or thought of Zionism in 7th century Arabia, nor do I think you can blame Zionism for the ethnic cleansing in Aceh. In fact the word for what happened in those two countries is Islamism, altho' of course there were no indigenous Jewish inhabitants, only Bhuddist, Hindu and Christians.

You are making your argument around the word "modern" so that apart from the ethnic cleansing in Aceh (which didn't figure largely in the western news until the tsunami) and the ongoing war in the Phillipines, you can make it a closed subject. Perhaps you would like to explain your argument in a broader context when you could not make the debate quite so simple. In fact, it is very complex but I must admit you very cleverly skirted the subject by containing the time period.

To Q and Gay Man - How convenient for zionist activists to deliberately overlook the normal atrocities that occur in the zionist state daily, the millions of Palestinians who are under curfew and blockade, starving and brutalized, in the Middle East's only colonized state. As a result, you knowingly feign the reality of zionism, a racist and irredeemable movement, that survived the twentieth centuries' other genocidal and seemingly passing revolutions such as Bolshevism, Nazism, and Apartheid.

A century ago, zionism extended Western colonialism to Palestine. The sad truth is that over a century after its founding, zionism seems to be grander and more honorable than its reality. Arabs have suffered from zionism's belligerence and exclusivity, and many have blamed the United States, and the West, for this because of their unshakeable support of zionism. the zionist state's aggression especially during this year has finally renewed international recognition that zionism is racism.

It is now up to all good jews to follow in the footsteps of the brave few, and denounce the racist and separatist nature of zionism, while the world should encourage them to do so. The world should not allow the torchbearers of zionism to silence and quell the idealism of these few. No nationalism is pure, no movement is perfect, no state is ideal, but today, zionism persists as a menace, a militaristic and dictatory movement to me and to most Palestinians. A century ago, zionism extended Western colonialism to Palestine; today, as in the rest of the world, colonialism must be ideologically purged from Palestine.

I believe that zionism is racism, because 61 years after being exiled from their homeland, in defiance of the four Geneva Conventions, UN Resolutions 181, 194, 242, 338, and others, and other multilateral and international human rights conventions, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the disinherited refugees of Palestine, continue to endure merciless punishment from the Zionist entity, such as during the Gaza Massacre at the beginning of this year.

I believe that zionism is racism, because without recognizing the colonialist component in zionism, I cannot explain its racist character, a western movement uprooting the native peoples of Palestine, Muslim, Christian, Jew, Samaritan alike, a people bound to their land, through centuries of raising olive groves, and herding sheep, lending grace to the Hills of God, historically, religiously and culturally.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it fails to appreciate or acknowledge the Palestinians' ties to their homeland, their love for their historical capital, Jerusalem, and the 61-year plight they have endured as refugees worldwide, in Europe, in North America, and others, never giving up hope or struggle in yearning to return home.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it fails to admit the reality that the minority indigenous Jewish community in Palestine, that lived there for the last two thousand years, was an undistinguishable people from its Christian and Muslim Palestinian brethren, and that the leader of the Jewish community of the Jewish quarter of Old Jerusalem, Rabbi Lamram Blau, stood on the side of his Palestinian brothers and sisters being exiled in 1948.

I believe that zionism is racism because in modern times, the promise of liberal democracy and justice is a double-edged sword, preached by the Western powers, yet only paid lip-service to in the case of the zionist state, where Palestinians are continuously expelled, ethnically cleansed, and subjugated, and in the cases where they are assimilated, they are granted, limited, if any, civil rights.

I believe that zionism is racism, because in establishing the racially exclusive zionist state, in 1948, and expelling the indigenous Palestinians from the land, the zionists severed a relationship that people had to the land for over 4,000 years, uninterrupted, since before Abraham.

I believe that zionism is racism, because in building the zionist state, the zionists were revising history, embracing the notion of racial superiority, an ideology that has empowered them to discriminate, with all of its associated social ills, injustices, and moral bankruptcy.

I believe that zionism is racism because it fails to distinguish between the nationalism of the Palestinian, based on multi-cultural harmony, and the racial exclusivity, separatism, ethnic cleansing, and brutality of zionism, that stands in clear violation of the most basic elements of international law and human rights practices, as most recently highlighted by reports issued by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

I believe that zionism is racism because it self-propagates itself as a democratic movement. However, a democracy, cannot, by definition, only be representative of one community in a bi-national and tri-religious contiguous geographic area. A democracy cannot exist for one people and not for another. This is called Apartheid in South Africa, and is now called zionism in Palestine.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it espouses an independent and sovereign Jewish state, in a land where there is no Jewish majority. It espouses that such a sovereign state be at peace and harmony with its neighbors without allowing the Palestinian refugees dwelling within their borders, who were expelled from their homes in Palestine by zionist militias, as is clearly documented by numerous sources including the memoirs of David-Ben Gurion himself, to return to their homes, which is a basic human right guaranteed by Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I believe that zionism is racism because it is presented by its champions, from Gil Troy to Elie Wiesel, as a romantic movement, which allowed zionists to reclaim the desert and build a model nation-state. This is racism at its most acute, since there was no desert in Palestine, other than the Negev in the South. This is simply a myth that has been propagated by racists who have supported the zionist state for the last 61 years, and economic data on agricultural exports to Europe from Palestine dating to medieval times easily rejects and exposes this as a blasphemous claim.

And here is the reality of zionism, yes, as Vladamir Jabotinsky, father of revisionist zionism said in a racist boast in 1923, "There can be no discussion of a voluntary reconciliation between us and the Arabs. Any native people view their country as their national home. They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner. Colonization can have only one goal. For the Palestinian Arabs this goal is inadmissible. This is in the nature of things. To change that nature is impossible. Colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population - an iron wall which the native population cannot break through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate it any other way would only be hypocrisy."

The superior claim to national territory is the attribution of a superior quality to members of the national group. The denial of this claim to certain other ethnic groups is the attribution of an inferior status to their members. The lack of an open-door immigration policy means, that these claims are translated into real exclusion. Finally, the acquisition of citizenship by descent is a purely biological mechanism: it is racist in the general sense, but it is also closest to the biological ideologies first described by the term "racism".

There is no inherent moral reason why states should limit immigration, or residence, or citizenship, simply on grounds of birth. In fact, it is hard to think of any moral justification for it. It is clearly racist in the general sense of the word, and its derivation from the ideology of nationalism indicates the racist origins of that ideology. The nationalism underlying the zionist state, which is accurately called Zionism, is no different in this respect. Here too, Zionism is racist.

And thus, all zionists abound are exposed as nothing more than vile, insidious, racist creatures disguising themselves in the cloak of political debate and progressive judaism.

"The Jews say: "God's hand is tied up. Be their hands tied up and be they accursed for the (blasphemy) they utter. Nay, both His hands are widely outstretched: He giveth and spendeth (of His bounty) as He pleaseth. But the revelation that cometh to thee from God increaseth in most of them their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. Amongst them we have placed enmity and hatred till the Day of Judgment. Every time they kindle the fire of war, God doth extinguish it; but they (ever) strive to do mischief on earth. And God loveth not those who do mischief" (The Glorious Quran - 5:64).

Q - Is this for your own knowledge, or are you trying to catch me out? Either way, I hope it brings you closer to Islam, the Islam that you refuse to see. Since it is my duty as a Muslim to clear any misconceptions regarding Islam, and since my religion is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, It's my pleasure to give it to you straight:

"Pls explain Dar El-Harb, Dar El-Islam, Dar El-Dhimmi and Dar Al-Kufr in light of your statement 'Islam totally forbids racism, ethnic cleansing and apartheid'".

To get the full picture, it would be better if you read Dar Al-Islam And Dar Al-Harb: Its Definition and Significance by Ahmed Khalil.

"Islam therefore rejects zionism in all its forms." How has this been applied since the inception of Islam?

The Glorious Quran prohibits racism in any form i.e.:

"O mankind! We have created you from a single male and female and made you into nations and tribes so that you may know each other. The most honorable of you in the sight of Allah are surely the righteous." (The Glorious Quran - Al-Hujurat: 13).

"O mankind! Be careful of your duty to your Lord Who created you from a single soul and from it created its mate and from them twain hath spread abroad a multitude of men and women." (The Glorious Quran - An-Nisa’: 1).

Prophet Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him) said: "All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action. You know that every Muslim is the brother of another Muslim. Remember, one day you will appear before God and answer for your deeds. So beware, do not astray from the path of righteousness after I am gone."

In the same way that Islam rejects anti-semitism, a racist ideology, it also rejects zionism, another racist ideology. It must not be forgotten, however, that not all jews are zionists. Indeed, there are many jews who oppose the crimes against humanity of zionism, fiercely criticise these, maintain that the zionist state must immediately withdraw from all the occupied territories, and wish the zionist state to be a free state in which all nations and identities can live together as equals. As Muslims rightfully oppose zionism, therefore, they must bear these truths in mind and be aware that the criticisms are aimed at zionism, not at jews. For someone to criticise and hurt innocent jews on account of the crimes of zionism is a violation of justice. If we condemn the various jewish communities in the world on account of the unjust occupation by and attacks of zionism, we again contravene justice and commit a grave error. If we perpetrate terrorist actions against those who support the aggression and occupations of zionist ideology and aims these at the zionist state's civilians, we turn away entirely from the path of justice, and commit a grave sin by targeting innocent people.

Thus we can see that Islam is the very antidote to racism; and where Islam flourishes there cannot be any place for racism.

"Can you also explain why there was the necessity during the Arab Conquest and successive expansive phases of Islam to kill so many people?"

The Great Arab Conquests : How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live in (Hugh Kennedy)

Let me first remind you that Islam strongly prohibits forcing anyone to accept Islam i.e.:

"Let there be no compulsion in religion. The truth is henceforth distict from error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knoweth all things". (The Glorious Quran - 2:256).

"Say: The Truth is from your Lord. Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject [it]" (The Glorious Quran - 18:29).

"Goodness and evil can never be equal. Repel [evil] with good: then will he between whom and you was hatred become as it were your friend and intimate}(The Glorious Quran - 41:34).

"Invite [all] to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His path, and who receive guidance" (The Glorious Quran - 16:125).

During these wars, only those that resisted were attacked, and this was very strictly commanded and followed. As an example, take Egypt (a "Muslim" country), home to roughly 7 million Coptic Christians (who are probably the closest to the original Christians). If Islam killed unnecessarily or forced reversion, wouldn't they have been wiped out? The same goes for the Persian Jews. Indonesia has the largest population of Muslims in the world (over 200 million), yet not a single army invaded them or brought violence to them. If Islam forced reversion, then why did Indonesians accept Islam when no one came to attack them?

It is thus clear that Islam strongly forbids unnecessary bloodshed in times of war, even POW's are to be respected and taken care of i.e. food, medication etc.

There is no evidence anywhere to suggest that people were killed unnecessarily during the Arab Conquests. Now compare this to the Crusades or WW1 or WW2, or even the Palestinian Holocaust as perpetrated by the zionist state. You will find that the necessity to kill so many people unnecessarily is actually perpetrated by the zionists i.e. the systematic genocide of the Palestinian people using tanks, fighter jets, white phosphorus, cluster bombs etc.

"Can you also explain why it is that while Islam forbids the obscene tendencies you cite that the Muslim states have so much difficulty in signing up to the UN Charter of Human Rights?"

Depends what a zionist means by "Human Rights". I mean the zionist state is one of the, if not the biggest violator of human rights and internation law.

Let me remind you that each of the fundamental human rights guaranteed in the UNDHR are already found in the Glorious Quran. Just visit http://www.submis sion.org/unhmnrights.ht ml (with spaces). We already signed up to this over 14 centuries ago.

What you must understand is that the UNDHR fails to take into account the cultural and religious context of Islamic countries. It is a secular interpretation of a Judeo-Christian tradition which can't be implemented without trespassing on Islamic law. That is why there is a compatible Cairo Declaration as an alternative.

I hope this answers your questions.

Some organized massacres perpetrated by zionists:

The Massacre at Baldat al-Shaikh
YEHIDA MASSACRE
KHISAS MASSACRE
QAZAZA MASSACRE
The Semiramis Hotel Massacre
The Massacre at Dair Yasin
NASER AL-DIN MASSACRE
THE TANTURA MASSACRE
BEIT DARAS MASSACRE
THE DAHMASH MOSQUE MASSACRE
DAWAYMA MASSACRE
HOULA MASSACRE
SHARAFAT MASSACRE
Salha Massacre
The Massacre at Qibya
KAFR QASEM MASSACRE
Khan Yunis Massacre
The Massacre in Gaza City
AL-SAMMOU' MASSACRE
Aitharoun Massacre
Kawnin Massacre
Hanin Massacre
Bint Jbeil Massacre
Abbasieh Massacre
Adloun Massacre
Saida Massacre
Fakhani Massacre
Beirut Massacre Sabra And Shatila Massacre
Jibsheet Massacre
Sohmor Massacre
Seer Al Garbiah
Maaraka Massacres
Zrariah Massacre
Homeen Al-Tahta Massacre
Jibaa Massacre
Yohmor Massacre
Tiri massacre
Al-Naher Al-Bared Massacre
Ain Al-Hillwee Massacre
OYON QARA MASSACRE
Siddiqine Massacre
AL-AQSA MOSQUE MASSACRE
THE IBRAHIMI MOSQUE MASSACRE
THE JABALIA MASSACRE
Aramta Massacre
ERETZ CHECKPOINT MASSACRE
Deir Al-Zahrani Massacre
Nabatiyeh (school bus) Massacre
Mnsuriah Massacre
The Sohmor Second Massacre
Nabatyaih Massacre
Qana Massacre
Trqumia Massacr
Janta Massacre
24 Of June 1999 Massacres
Western Bekaa villages Massacre:
2009 Gaza Massacre