Fri, 03/09/2010 - 10:11am
Bismillah

no-more-orphans-.gif

Creating The Muslim Slave Mind

Mind

The greatest victory that Western elites had on coloured people was the replacement of physical oppression with the use of psychological oppression. By creating the belief that Black and Brown people were inferior to them, they replaced physical chains with psychological ones.

In this way, injustices had been disguised to make them seem natural and inevitable and thus ensuring they go unchallenged.

These people remained slaves - they just weren't aware of it any more.

In the past, it was taught that Blacks and Asians were inferior because of the pigmentation of their skin. Leaders such as Malcolm X destroyed and exposed these arguments. Yet, such feelings of inferiority can still be traced today.

How many times have we heard Asian men and women taking pride in the fairness of their skin, never realising that by giving in to the false perception that fair skin was a sign of beauty? They were showing how enslaved their mind was.

With Muslims who rejected the mind of the slave, they fought a different war - an ideological war.

They created through the Media a narrative that Muslims were both violent and fanatically unjust to large sections of the population. Treatment of women was a particular stick to beat us with. They backed this up by highlighting Muslim resistance groups who took up arms against occupation or fought against propped-up dictators for the freedom they so desired or poorly implemented Sharia law in a village.

Of course, the fact that the village had implemented Sharia so poorly was never explained by the media and no attempt was made to give any depth to the story. It was used as a weapon and nothing else. When it came to violent acts, the root reason for violence too was airbrushed. They instead used a propaganda trick – they highlighted on one or two unjust acts by Muslims and then highlighted them as the norm, attacking the ideology ‘Islam’ as the root motivator for the unjust act they had specifically selected to help them score the ideological point.

Anything that could be linked to Islam that made it look barbaric and violent was shown globally as proof of their ideological superiority and Muslim barbarism.

Muslim scholars had no consciousness of this war or how to fight it. They instead focused on trivial matters of faith allowing the attacks to go unchallenged, taking young people who looked up to them into a world of sleep and pointless debate – learning for learning's sake.

The result was that the community lost its confidence. With no intellectual response to the attacks, they started to doubt their own beliefs and their own selves: the same way black people started to hate all things African, slowly at first, until being called ‘African’ became an insult one gave to another to show how backward they were.

Now Muslims started to doubt. They started to question and reject the actions of their fellow men which they now saw in the news. Their simple reaction was to go on the defensive in an attempt to try to explain the manufactured propaganda footage that made them look so bad to the wider community. Footage that seemed to justify the stereotype they had worked so hard to create in the first place.

Incompetent slogans like ‘Islam is peace’ were repeated by Muslim Leaders, or the 'It is a few extremists who do this, the great majority are good people' arguments were put forward, in an attempt to show they were not as violent as people thought they were. By doing so, all they in fact did was show they had accepted the propaganda as fact. They had lost by the simplest method – they started to believe they were wrong.

And that was the game plan. It was never about honest analysis; it was never about highlighting to improve. It was a war in their eyes, a war where one ideology had to defeat the other. Thus, you will see in most news stories or ‘documentaries’ an accusatory tone, where the Muslims are always having to justify why they are so bad, or up to no good, or behaving in such an unacceptable way.

The double standard between the way they talked of the Muslim community and other communities was the final proof that these attacks were propaganda and not in any way genuine.

Here, MPACUK has highlighted the hidden ideological war being waged on the Muslim world. Later, we will explain the need and how the Muslims can stand up to it.

If you want to discuss this please come to our discussion circles across the country. Simply email us or call us and we will let you know when they are being held.

Tags

Share or Bookmark this article

Understand more...

11 comments

 

Gosh what a confused

Gosh what a confused conflation of disparate ideas.

The notion that the preference for pale skin is rooted in colonialism & imperialism and the dominance of the "white" nation is absurd. Throughout the northern hemisphere having pale skin was an indicator of social status. It was the poor peasants who had to work in the fields that were tanned. That differential existed in every northern European state until the 1920's, when it became fashionable to sunbathe. In China & Japan pale skin had been a demonstration of wealth & power for centuries long before contact with the West. Have we all forgotten that early Muslims chroniclers expressed concern that if the preference among Arab men for "white" women continued that the Arab characteristics in the feudal elites would disappear, and that only the poor would remain Arabs.

The experience of the Afro-American and Afro-Caribbean communities as slaves and the post-bellum experience of discrimination is distinct to them, and cannot be reasonably conflated with the experiences of Muslim societies following the rise of the Western Imperial states and colonialism. Nor is there a homogenous pan-Muslim experience. While Malcom X and others may have embraced Islam, it does not diminish the fact that the Atlantic slave trade was developed upon the basis of the existing Arab controlled slave trade that raided sub-Saharan Africa and coastal Europe. African slaves and their descendents were almost universally powerless and abused. This cannot be said of Muslims, if only because Muslims were in many cases the tormentors.

With the rise of the West and particularly the British Empire, the Muslim world was challenged on two fronts. 1 It's self-perception as a dominant faith 2 It's understanding of its self and its relationship with the outside world as an imperial entity. From the 17th C onward the West progressively eclipsed the Muslim world in every sphere of human endeavour. The military / imperial establishments that had served Muslims well up to that point were systematically defeated.

With the emergence in the 20th C of the concept of an international community with universal values the Muslim world found itself in conflict again as these universal humanitarian values conflicted with Islam. Muslims activitists increasingly found themselves in a "schizophrenic" situation wherein they demanded equality from non-Muslim nations but denied the same to minorities in their own midst. This issue remains unresolved and thus a focus for "western" criticism.

In the secular West with its pronounced division between state and religion Muslims are challenged to demonstrate that thery adhere to the same values as citizens of those states and as members of the international community. At the heart of Islam sits a paradigm that is fundamentally different to the dominant Judeo-Christian tradition. Despite Muslims claims for Islam, it has been the West that has led on gender, race & ethnic equality. It has been the West that initiated the international campaign to end slavery. It is the West that developed the concept of Universal Human Rights.

The allegations of Muslim barbarity and inhumanity resonate with the past Interaction between islam and the rest of the world, when Muslims were barborous and predatory. The Muslim world simply refuses to recognise this and while making repeated references to the horrors of the Crusades overlooks that the non-Msulim experience of the Arab Conquest and the islamic imperialism does not differ substantially from the experience of Muslims during the Crudades. The only difference being the scale.

Western critics cannot understand how and why some prominent Muslims spokespersons and intellectuals have absorbed the racist elements of European fascism and intolerance and woven them into Islam. Equally they cannot understand why the Muslim collective does not vocally refute such distortions.

Jumbling up a number of unconnected complaints and observations does not make a coherent or compelling argument. It merely reflects intellectual weakness and self-obsession

 

Q Hope you are being paid per word.

I don't have time to respond to each and every of your distorted comment. On this just one sentence I want to offer a dofferent perspective:

"Western critics cannot understand how and why some prominent Muslims spokespersons and intellectuals have absorbed the racist elements of European fascism and intolerance and woven them into Islam. Equally they cannot understand why the Muslim collective does not vocally refute such distortions."

It could very easily read as follows:

Western critics cannot understand how and why prominent Jewish spokespersons and intellectuals have absorbed the racist elements of European fascism and intolerance they call Zionism and woven it into Judaism so that land grab, persecution, wars by deception, brutal mass murders are regarded as fulfilling a religious duty. Equally they cannot understand why the Jewish collective, that itself suffered from European fascism, does not vocally refute such distortions.

 

Hornstein: There are many

Hornstein: There are many Jewish opponents to various aspects of Zionism and Zionism itself. They are often featured here on the MPACUK site.
I have yet to see the same conflation of the Torah with the alleged fascist texts, certainly not explicitly anyway. If you could show us all a clear & unequivocal example of how for instance post 1933 German laws are replicated in the Israeli consititution it would be very helpful.
However the frequency that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is awarded authenticity and conflated with elements of Islam I find deeply disturbing.
Of course you may believe that the Protocols is in fact a genuine text accurately reporting the intentions and actions of the identified Jews.

 

Q stop talking out of your bum

I have do not have time to respond to your distorted article. but will offer different presceptive.

It does not take a genius to figure out that the europeans including all territory in control of european settled; have done the most damage to slave's in record time of 400 years although slavery was much a delight to everyone around the world for many centuries.

As far as your claim and proclaim about western civilization embracing change to show understanding of modernity I think not; just for one simple reason "democracy" which has been the source of upto 1 billion of deaths around the world direct or indirect whether you like or not. Please do not write things you clearly do not know about and anyway what qualifies you as historian?

 

Jewish traits of Muslims

Muslims are known as the bow and arrow people in white peoples pubs and social circles. The reality is that we failed to recognise the threats, and people say those who don't know the present times, wouldn't know the future; hence Muslims are all headless chickens running into each other.

While the white man and his Jewish spies kill Muslims from the skies, the Muslim is the one killing the majority of Muslims on ground whether they call themselves Gay Pashtuns, Rich Arabs, Hungry Somalians etc.

We just can't get our priorities right, look at Iran with the majority of its people having no access to tap water yet they want a nuclear a power station. Why give the little money the country has to fat French or German companies?

People with compassion would have put their houses in order, but we are not one them.

 

For once I actually agree

For once I actually agree with the sentiment of Cosa Nostra, if not the first two paragraphs. He has hit the nail on the head.
Part of the problem is perception. When we see a "fighter" brandishing his Kalashnikov and firing wildly into the sky we do not ask "at what cost". What is not understood is that the cost of a clip of 7.62 x 39mm ammo costs as much as it costs to feed a Palestinian child for a month. The weapon itself costs enough to feed the entire family for a month. A Kalashnikov costs more than a $1000 in Gaza, even up to £2500. Yet with alacrity the fighter wastes ammunition. A single bullet costs more than a tetanus or TB or MMR injection. So why are the fighters wasting ammunition when children are dying for the want of these basic preventative measures?
The entire ME needs to address its inability to feed, clothe & house its populations adequately. Agriculture is teetering towards collapse, the land is over-farmed, the Sahara desert is growing. The populations have grown faster than the country can employ or feed these people.

 

Diplomat: Pls clarify 1.

Diplomat: Pls clarify
1. "although slavery was much a delight to everyone around the world for many centuries."
2. "democracy" which has been the source of upto 1 billion of deaths around the world direct or indirect

 

q NO Thanks

I would not like to be drawn in to your standoffish debate you can continue with Cosa_Nostra because she/he seems to have all the answers

 

the slave mind was created by

the slave mind was created by destroying the achievements of muslims in the minds of muslims.
only know are muslims around the world waking up to their scientific heritage,when you wish to create mental slavery you demean the person ,you tell him he is worthless ,everything is his own fault, the person who bullies him tells him he is worthless not because of his bullying.
Q th Zionist deviant is a perfect example of those who seek to lecture muslims by saying it is your own fault.
The world is changing and the Zionists and their vassal know this and are doing their best to delay the inevitable although they believe they can stop it.

 

Yakoub

"The notion that the preference for pale skin is rooted in colonialism & imperialism and the dominance of the "white" nation is absurd..."

Anyone who has read any Fanon will know this guy is talking rubbish from the start. And sorry if this sounds conspiritorial, but Q is probably a Quilliam troll. Nobody writes such detailed specious nonsense, unless its for cash.

 

Let yourself be aware that I

Let yourself be aware that I am pleased with my creations when they tear each other apart. So many broken bodies and souls to feed on.
Let your hatreds build into blind furies and feed my endless hunger for bloody fools

Empowerment through political participation

Recent comments

Copyright MPACUK © 2000-2009. All rights reserved

For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.

— Aristotle