What race are muslims?

Yes, the civilised nations of the world will not be attending this racist conference.

Anti-Zionism = Anti-Semitism, in the mouths of those who scream about it the loudest.

Well then none of the Arab countries will be represented there I suppose nor Pakistan. They're just as racist. Why single out by religious belief ?

Jews United Against Zionism support the racist conference! Zionit are biggest threat to the civilised world! And Unlike Cromwell who supports uncivilised people!

"Founding a modern state on a single ethnic or religious identity in a territory that is ethnically and religiously diverse leads inexorably either to politics of exclusion (think of the 139-square-mile prison camp that Gaza has become) or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. Put simply, the problem is Zionism."

By Ben Ehrenreich in an Op-Ed for the LA Times

The reality is that israelis are the biggest anti-semites as hidden and covered up by the so called civilised world, america home of genocidal maniacs who have exterminated and oppressed hundreds of millions.
Israel a state built upon theft-murder-torture-rape and daily oppression, if this is what is meant by civilisation then i sure would not like to know what uncivilised means.

your usual lack of facts mpac.this so called conference is about defamation of religion,not race,and when they say religion they mean islam.the fact that the facists who want this conference to take place have been told by countless countries to moderate their anti-semetic language is testament to islamic belief in equality.try putting news on this site instead of propaganda!

You are joking yeah? Racist? Rubbish, objections to this have nothing to do with racism. As Christopher Hitchens has pointed out in SLATE magazine this UN forum has a rather unpleasant clause about not giving offence to the religious.

Though it is written tongue-in-cheek in the language of human rights and of opposition to discrimination, the nonbinding U.N. Resolution 62/154, on "Combating defamation of religions," actually seeks to extend protection not to humans but to opinions and to ideas, granting only the latter immunity from being "offended." The preamble is jam-packed with hypocrisies that are hardly even laughable, as in this delicious paragraph, stating that the U.N. General Assembly:

Underlining the importance of increasing contacts at all levels in order to deepen dialogue and reinforce understanding among different cultures, religions, beliefs and civilizations, and welcoming in this regard the Declaration and Programme of Action adopted by the Ministerial Meeting on Human Rights and Cultural Diversity of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, held in Tehran on 3 and 4 September 2007.

Paragraph 5 "expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism," while Paragraph 6 "[n]otes with deep concern the intensification of the campaign of defamation of religions and the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001."
You see how the trick is pulled? In the same weeks that this resolution comes up for its annual renewal at the United Nations, its chief sponsor-government (Pakistan) makes an agreement with the local Taliban to close girls' schools in the Swat Valley region (a mere 100 miles or so from the capital in Islamabad) and subject the inhabitants to Sharia law. This capitulation comes in direct response to a campaign of horrific violence and intimidation, including public beheadings. Yet the religion of those who carry out this campaign is not to be mentioned, lest it "associate" the faith with human rights violations or terrorism. In Paragraph 6, an obvious attempt is being made to confuse ethnicity with confessional allegiance. Indeed this insinuation (incidentally dismissing the faith-based criminality of 9/11 as merely "tragic") is in fact essential to the entire scheme. If religion and race can be run together, then the condemnations that racism axiomatically attracts can be surreptitiously extended to religion, too. This is clumsy, but it works: The useless and meaningless term Islamophobia, now widely used as a bludgeon of moral blackmail, is testimony to its success.

And see where the language of Paragraph 10 of the resolution is taking us. Having briefly offered lip service to the rights of free expression, it goes on to say that "the exercise of these rights carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, public health or morals and respect for religions and beliefs." The thought buried in this awful, wooden prose is as ugly as the language in which it is expressed: Watch what you say, because our declared intention is to criminalize opinions that differ with the one true faith!!

Pah, this is nothing to do with racism. I shall be writing to my MP and anyone else who will listen to get the UK to vote against this.

Calling countries like the UK, USA, Australia etc to a conference against racism, is a bit like calling Pol Pot, Hitler and Stalin to a conference on Human Rights. What can they teach the rest of the world??? The racist colonialist mindset held by the majority of it's citizens, especially thier ruling classes has led them to slaughter tens of millions of innocents in the last few hundred years. Even today the slaugter continues as they pursue their plans for dominance and power. The RACIST, APARTHEID state of Israel is the natural 'bastard' child of these imperialists.

"Civilised"? Just because people wear suit and tie, can Hitler be classed as "civilised" too?
"Lipstik on a PIG, Still a PIG"

Zionist government Broken More UN Regulations than all other countries put together,

We are "civilised", if you disagree we'll bomb you to Stone Age, US told Pakistan –
www.timesonline.co.uk / tol / news / world / middle_east / article647188.ece


More nonsense, this is an old tactics, you are insulting the intelligence of readers here.

www.jewsagainstzionism.com

Anti-Semitism in Israel.
www.pogrom.org.il/eng_articles.php?art_id=1

Interesting....who is organising this conference? Which country or countries are sponsoring it?

Mpac are you realy this stupid or just angry that level headed head of states are seeing through this charade for what it is, a hate fest against Jews isnt that why only Arab nations and jew bashers support it?

If you want to equate the correct idea of non muslims being weary of Islams mandate for them ref koran 9.29 as racist against muslims, then you must by the same token admit that muslims are racists and have ethinicly clensed 98% of the middle east e.g what happened to all the copts in Eygpt, Asirians in Siria, Chritians in Lebanon, Hindus in India, and expelled 900,000 jews from arab lands as collective punishment so dont moan when no one falls for muslim propaganda

You lying scumbag, everyone has moved on you know, criticising Israel is not anti-Semitism or “anti-semetic”, haven’t you leant anything in 20years. You must be using a mobile phone post these comments while taking a dump, because it sounds like you are also talking out of the rear end as well.

"...shaping up to be one that exposes who exactly the worlds most racist nations actually are – by them being conspicuous by their absence."

Everyone in the world is mad except me.

So once again we are to be treated to this unseemly circus staged by the assembled dictorships and oppressive regimes of the world. Of course it will provide us with the opportunity to rant and rave without challenge in every ascending cycles of hysteria. Of course there will be the usual cast of characters who will appear to voice their support of this international performance of the theatre of the tragi-comic. Within each act they will perceive progress that the regimes that fund them neither aspire to in fact or have ever attained.
Yet we should be grateful for the catharsis this provides our troubled souls. We shall feel refreshed. And we shall return like dogs to our vomit, to wallow in self-righteousness and self-pity.
Not once we will question why the nations who have opened their doors to us to provide succour and opportunity, to whose laws we appeal for protection, voice objection to the tenor of this event. We are blind and deaf to the abomination that we have created from the purity of Islam. It is we who have formed from the love of Islam the endless cycle of murder-rape-sodomy-theft to be visited upon the weak and defenceless.
Whatever the crimes of the Zionists and their allies, Durban is an exercise in dishonesty and as such fundamentally opposed to the central tenets of Islam.

Ermm, Mick. I don't know whether you've realised, but they're still all there. Lebanon is 40% Christian, Copts make up 10% of the Egyptian population, Hindus were always the majority in India.

The only part of the world that has 'moved on' is that which will not be attending this racist conference. The only part of the world which has 'moved on' is that which doesn't subscribe to the age-old Jewish/Zionist conspiracies - mantras routinely trotted out on this website.

Move on - stop blaming Jews for your own inadequacies and failures in life.

I suggest you go an look athttp://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ to see how much hate can be found in Islam. Just this week alone 183 people have been murdered in Jihad attacks.

One should take note of typical Muslim ignorance and paranoia and recall what al Arit al Akhdar said: 

The idea of taking responsibility for the ills of one's own society (meaning Islamic ones) lost out to the ease of blaming everything on evil foreigners.

[quote=Cromwell stop blaming Jews for your own inadequacies and failures in life.[/quote]
What failures? you calling all Muslims are failures? you fascist scumbag.

Criticising Israel is not anti-Semitism.

Compared to whom?
You hate Muslims; nobody is perfect, don’t see you making any other points.

What failures? you calling all Muslims are failures? you fascist scumbag.

Criticising Israel is not anti-Semitism

And how many people have been murdered in the name of democracy or in the name of conquest?

Looks like all the Anglospere nations (as defined by Radio Shire, and that soon to be dead dj Brian) are against this from some reason. Could it be that Israel cancelled first? lol

That website? I've never seen so much hate packed into one page.

As for ills in the Muslim world, both people in the Muslim World and foreigners are to blame. To completely blame one side over the other is stupid.

What failures? you calling all Muslims are failures? you fascist scumbag.

Criticising Israel is not anti-Semitism.
[/quote]

Fascists and Nazis used to scream pretty loud about Jews. They blamed their failures on Jewish success. It seems that some in the Muslim community have picked up where the Nazis left off and are now blsming 'Zionism' (aka Jews) for the failures of Muslim countries.

Well I have pointed you to a site that monitors Jihad atrocities so you do the same, answer your own question or are you afraid to face up to what is presented on the site I quoted. In any case it is not a defence ever to say that someone else is just as bad as you are is it?

You obviously know NOTHING about Islamic history. If you want to see imperialism go look there, if you want to see oppression go there, if you want to see racism go there or is it for you all sanitized?

No, don’t have problem with jews, just zionisiom, criminal clap trap, according many prominent Jewish scholars, it’s simply aganst true jewish ideology (TORA), Islam is a peaceful Ideology (not saying all Muslims), many now feel zionisiom already had it’s high point, and now with the 2008 xmas mass murder during peace time, we are seeing it’s downhill decent, also the rape charges, and the rise of the anti-Semitism within Israel and the swing to the right. President “barack hussein obama” can limit Americas billions of tax dollars, we tried zionisiom for 90years and it brought noting but death and distraction to humanity. Now Change, go to plan B, just deal direct with the oil dealers, Israel will loose its importance.

CIA, hmmmm. why do they care? Unless they are worried they wouldn’t have anywhere else to dump their potential future liabilities.

The context of Silvers questioning is so wrong, I dont know where to being to tell you the flaws. 'JIhad' means struggle, but obviously to the Western world, you have many meanings to this word. Whereas you are quite quick to jump on the 'Jihadi bastards' bandwagon' you are equally vociferous in defending what is 'democracy' and your inability to answer my question shows that.
To me murder is murder, whether that be in the name of democracy, or brutal terrorism, however please refrain from using the word 'jihad' as you havent acquired the necessary meaning and the in depth analysis and study of this subkect. And to provide you with more information about conquest, do youn ot remember the Spanish Inquisition, and the Middle Ages (Crusades). How quick are you to forget such demonic actions but you criticise others on that you dont know much about..

On what basis do we determine what is or what is not "true jewish ideology (TORA)" (Deen). Even if a handful of Jews who hold views at odds with the vast majority.It is a strange situation where we as Muslims assert that we have insight into what is or is not Judaism.
What credibility would we give if Jews arrogated themselves the position of defining Islam on the basis of what some minority sect claimed as being "true" Islam? I suspect that we would be incandescent with rage at their presumption.
Let us not tarry reminding the Jews of their errors while we err ourselves.

Commando, the term Jihad encompasses many things and is an amorphous term ranging from the inner struggle for perfection to the external struggle against those that would subordinate Islam. However you should recognise that as an outsider Silver uses the term in association with those that have hijacked it to legitimise their murderous actions. He should not be the object of criticism or censure, for he is neither educated nor informed enough to be aware of the distinctions. Those that misuse "Jihad" to provide cover for their infamies should be objects of blame and condemnation. We equally should learn to be less sensitive about this until such times as we lead the way condemning those who misuse the teachings of the Prophet (PBUH) to further their criminal actions.