|
 As we informed you previously, The Daily Mail and the Zionist blogosphere have created a storm around Inayat Bunglawala, twisting the facts and claiming he was an extremist who stabbed an innocent man.
Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP who is well known for his incompetence when it comes to getting it right as far as blacks and Muslims are concerned, even had the cheek to claim the Government should not be dealing with extremists like Inayat.
One of the motivators of this hype was to get the Crown Prosecution Service to charge Inayat and thus financially and psychologically hurt one of the bulwarks against Israel amongst British Muslim leaders, who sadly on the whole are both cowardly and incompetent.
Today, the CPS said they would not take any action against Inayat. There was simply no case at all.
So why did Mercer, the shadow cabinet minister, call Inayat an extremist? Why did The Mail run the story and why did the Zionists in the blogosphere jump for joy? MPACUK.org present here the real story:
What actually happened for those who do not know, is an intruder tried to break into the house of Inayat in the middle of the night. Inayat's 3 year old child was sleeping as was his pregnant wife, woken by the noise of a man who at first tried to kick in the front door and then failing that, smashed the downstairs window. Inayat confronted the intruder and in the scuffle the intruder was stabbed.
That is all it took for the press, the political leaders of this country and the Zionists to rush to smear a Muslim leader as if he was a violent ‘extremist’.
It is time we Muslims learned to get political, to demand an end to this outrage, this witch hunt, this racist, malignant Islamaphobia pushed by Zionists in the media and Parliament that now infects the country’s elite and through them, the good people of Britain. Until Muslims start to stand up, we may as well give up on the word freedom and prepare ourselves for slavery.
We look forward to seeing you at an MPACUK talk in the near future.
Donate Online and Support MPACUK NOW |
|
|
|
Readers have left 19 comments.
Rob:
Someone breaks into his home in the middle of the night, in the struggle the criminal gets hurt.
The gentleman did what any father-husband would do, when he is attacked in the middle of the night, that is defend his family and property.
It seems in their rush to malign muslims politicians and media are forgetting facts but creating fiction by witholding information which gives a true reflection of events.
Shame on those who willfully decieved the public, no wonder politicians and journalists are among the most distrusted by the public.
sense:
Its typical of the anti Muslim establishment to publish a story where the facts were skeletal, I expect the paper is unlikely to publish a story headlined " Muslim fights off intruder" now the facts are known.MPACUK should also verify where they have received this information from as there are many who will be saying no smoke without fire.
deen:
Media has to start reporting incidence as an individual criminal issue, rather then try to compose a collective punishment on all Muslim where Muslim are not responsible nor allowed to police over every other Muslim in UK.
It is the UK Government who did their evil deeds in foreign land by stealing land from Palestine in 1918, murdering million of Iraqi public and arming Israeli to murder more civilian in Gaza as collective punishment and as a result turned it self in to the monster it is but now they are desperately trying discredit the victims (any one who is Muslim) in the hope to counter all Muslim claims.
All community workers who work at grass root level should unite and sue the hell out of media outlet because lot of communising building is lost with this kind of reckless media reporting takes place.
ZZ:
Thank you MPAC for keeping us informed of this incident via your website. We must stand up to injustice of this kind. We must ask who will be next to be smeared and falsely accused. Things are bad enough as it is, people don't need unnecessary worries and insecurities.
G.Ryan:
deen,idiotic as per the norm!what the f*ck has your post got to do with the subject.bunglawala is a fanatic,but it's he(and muppets,sorry muslims like him who keep telling us their islamic credentials)got himself in that fix.all muslims are free of doubt according to you then?wait till one of your brothers rapes your mother or sister!see how you feel then.
Ronbo 2571:
Wow,I think who ever wrote this article needs to be a little more considered and less angry.
It merely reinforces the the prejudices that anti muslim people feel,ie that there is a dreadful conspiracy.Reflect on the fact that in general UK muslims are the most free on this planet and in the particular case in point regarding the decision of the CPS not to take it further,I think that speaks volumes for British justice.
Contrast that with the recent case of the Iraqi journalist.....3 years for throwing a shoe!
Or gays being executed in Iran... it's a no brainer,better to be an 'opressed' muslin here than 'free' Mecca or a similar centre of free speach and harmony.
Wake up and smell the coffee
Demonising Muslims:
Just as it is the UK government's policy to discriminate against Muslims in employment and education it is also the UK government's policy to incriminate Muslims and what was done to Inayat is an example. Another example was how Lord Nazeer Ahmed was sent to jail. His crime was that the MI-5 texted his mobile moments before his car was part of an accident in which many other cars were involved and for which he had no responsibility nor was there evidence that Nazeer Ahmad was reading the MI-5's textmessage let alone sending one. It is a clever Zionist ploy and we should all ask where that burglar came from and may be trace his path back to see where it leads.
We cannot just allow the CPS to close the case. We must pursue the CPS to provide Freedom of information about the intruder.
Similarly idiots like Phil Woolas or Patrick Mercer famous for having their feet in their mouth when talking about Muslims should be investigated for their own roles in this attempt to frame Mr Bunglawala.
Voltage Brother:
It's rather ironic how MPACUK rebukes mosque committees for being closed clans that act according to their own interests when they themselves act in virtually the same way - defending Muslims who they like and are freindly with from media attack yet letting other Muslims be savaged. Furthermore MPACUK, the self appointed 'sheild of the ummah' seem very selective on what muslims they place their shield over.
Perhaps when MPACUK refers to 'the ummah' they should be more specific so that everyone is clear and say 'MPACUK's Ummah'.
Kiwi:
Dean:-
Until you report the correct facts and learn the history of WW1 your argument about the UK stealing Palestinian land will never be credible.
The Ottoman Empire went to war on the side of the Germans and lost to the allies. It lost! Therefore the Ottoman Empire lands, including the Holy Land(there has never been a Palestinian nation) reverted to the allies under the rules of war.
Educated people only debate with those that are knowledgeable about the true history of previous times. It was the allies, not UK alone, who redrew the boundaries of the old Ottoman Empire.
I suggest, to start with, you read the history of WW1, the Treaty of Sevres and the Balfour declaration - you might be surprised at what you find.
Abu Maryam:
The Daily "Heil" up to its old tricks, targeting Muslims.
Azad Ali from the Muslim Safety Forum, and Inayat. I hope both sue the paper.
So much for effectiveness for the PCC.
Who's next MPAC ?
I hope you guys are making contigency plans. :-)
pillocks:
Paranoid delusional gibberish from MPAC, who had absolutely nothing to do with the issue in the first place and only picked up the story some three months after everyone else.
crap as per, then
G.Ryan:
deen,your normal crap!it's ok for muslims to steal land(not that the uk or israelis did in judea)but no one else.also the jews killed plenty of british soldiers in the 40's.you(idiot that you are)seem to forget the genocides comitted by islamic nutters like you!if you want a list,get back to me,ill educated fool that you are!
G.Ryan:
really hope mpac is next!!!
deen:
wait till one of your brothers rapes your mother or sister!see how you feel then. — G.Ryan A few crazy emotional insults and outburst is the least of my worries, not uncommon from uneducated uncivilised scumbags that exists within every community. You support mass murders in Gaza, there is no reasoning with people with your mentality, completely unacceptable.
deen:
(there has never been a Palestinian nation) I suggest, to start with, you read the history of WW1, the Treaty of Sevres and the Balfour declaration - you might be surprised at what you find. — KiwiNonsense, old Zionist propaganda. Israel didn’t exists, and it still doesn’t exists cause Israel don’t recognise its own declared borders, I know many countries declared their independence similar (but not same) to Israel but I never seen country without borders. Oh yes, before I forget to mention. “British Mandate of Palestine", now what is the word “Palestine" meant, is it a bird, it is a plain, oh, it is a LAND. YES, a LAND, for someone who is encouraging others to read you don’t seem to know much.
Kiwi:
Palestine was the name used for the Roman protectorates of Judea and Samaria as Byzantine Christian Empire thought the name 'Israel' was too connected to the Jewish people. That is why, in the 1920's, the allies named it the Palestinian Mandate, which originally included Jordan when the lines were first drawn. However, 78% of the Mandate was given to the Hashemite tribe of Arabia , forming Transjordan, and leaving the remaining 22% for the Jewish homeland. That was halved by the UN resolution 181, 11% each for the Arabs and Jews. Israel announced its statehood and it was not Israels fault that the surrounding Arab countries decided to invade thereby wiping out any chance the Arabs in the remaining land of the Mandate had to declare a sovereign country of their own. That is not Ziomist propoganda, that is actual history. The name for the modern Palestinian came about after the'67 war and was used by Arafat to describe those who neither had citizenship of, or lived in Irael or Jordan but who had settled in the remaining land of the original Palestinian Mandate.
Strange that even the Quran mentions the fact the Allah gave the Jewish people the land of Israel.
Israel's borders have always changed because of land won, lost or handed back in the succeeding wars with the Arabs.
T.E.SAMAD:
First of all, we don't know the full story. Maybe Mr Bunglawala did deliberately try to kill the alleged intruder or maybe Mr Bunglawala was defending himself. I personally am not a fan of Inayat Bunglawala or the MCB and i trust the British justice system will solve this matter fairly and justly.
Shan:
The media in question deliberatly misled the public by withholding information to give the public enough rope to use rumour and speculation.
If the media was not trying to villify muslims, they would have simply stated Mr.Bunglawala was attacked in his home at night and in the struggle the attacker was hurt, the police are investigating the matter.
That is all that was needed but no, since he is of the muslim faith, every conceivable angle must be looked at.
Mpac mods when will you be using your stick to topic rule, everytime zionists attempt to turn the blog away from its main point, into muslims or arabs did this 1000 years ago or a hundred years ago.
deen:
Israel's borders have always changed because of land won. — KiwiWhat nonsense, what is your solution, kill all Palestinian and take the whole land. Israeli’s are uncivilised IDIOTS and anyone’s who supports them. Israel’s border should be as established by the 1949 armistice. Rational: A country should not be permitted to expand its borders as the consequence of warfare. Israel has no more right to occupy such lands than the United States has a right to occupy and control Japan.
|
