Adverts

Please click on our sponsors to show your support


Public Accountability: MPACUK, you should not have criticised Mawlid Print E-mail
Saturday, 12 April 2008

MPACUKAssalaam Alaikum

I am a member of another organisation, but I - like most Muslims - have no doubt that MPACUK is doing a great job, and most people get their updates from your website and act upon your advice. I whole-heartedly support MPACUK's efforts in making British Muslims active in the media and politics.

One concern that I have is that your approach on a particular issue will turn away people from MPACUK. That is issues relating to 'Sufis/Brelvis' as your website refers to them and in particular recent article criticising Mawlid celebrations. This type of approach defeats the whole purpose of MPACUK which is to unite Muslims for a common cause of media and political awareness for Muslims. I personally was very angered and found the articles insulting and if I was not politically and religiously mature and well versed I would have shunned MPACUK and deem it to be misguided, like some people are doing in some forums on the internet.

I raise this concern because I want MPACUK to prosper and not get held up by such issues.

Wassalaam

 

MPACUK believes in accountability of leaders and representatives of the public.

Here, a Muslim reader is upset by one of our recent articles . We feel members of the public have every right to demand more from their representatives and be given every opportunity in criticising Muslim organisations (as long as it does not aid the enemies of the Ummah). It is for this reason we have published this excellent letter from one of our respected readers.

Our response is that MPACUK is non-sectarian organisation and has members from all sects and schools of thought of Islam, including Brelvie, Tablighi, Shia and Salafies. However, whenever any of these groups or schools of thought fail the Ummah, we too feel we have a right to hold them accountable for the benefit of all.

Lastly we would like to add two points:

1) We saw in the video that a group of Brelvies (who acted no differently from thugs from other sects) stopped MPACUK distributing leaflets whose only purpose was to educate and thus protect the Ummah, and no one held them accountable apart from MPACUK. Sadly most mosques will treat you no less thuggishly upon receiving criticism.

2) We hope the publication of this letter goes some way to reassure our readers that MPACUK is one of the few Muslim groups in Britain who allow members of the Muslim public to criticise and hold us accountable.

One day we hope all Muslim groups will be accountable to the Muslim public.

Readers have left 12 comments.
unity: Quote

i would like to join the person who wrote to you about the article above we should have united stand against injustices but the way the article was written was very harsh a little bit of politeness doesnt cost and also the march in the video "this isnt a politocal demo" you (the marchers) had george galloway with you!!!sort yourselves out, the pair of yous!!!
(1) 2008-04-12 11:35:34
Tahira: Quote

But no-one in the MPACUK video is actually criticising the Mawlid? The message I heard was that if we really love the prophet we would surely act to protect his Ummah. Can't see anything wrong with that?
(2) 2008-04-12 17:17:19
nazir khan: Quote

MPACUK does not know how to be polite, that's why a lot of people just ignore them, there main leaders lack wisdom and have little chracteristics of a model muslim, shouting and being rude etc. The political side is all good, raising awareness etc.
(3) 2008-04-12 18:59:15
Mujaahid: Quote

While the message of MPACUK is extremely important, it is equally important that in uniting to condemn injustice - that our unity is not based upon falsehood. In other words while Sufis and others might agree with the aims of MPAC, it shouldn't stop individuals pointing out the incorrectness of certain positions such as the mawlid innovation.
(4) 2008-04-12 20:12:28
Mohsin beg: Quote

Re: Nazir

I would like to your example of a "polite" organisation, and your example of "leaders" who havce wisdom.

hmmmm, you sound like one of those "dodgy" people who use muslim names to create a decoy and diversion, hmmmmm

(5) 2008-04-12 21:51:13
mj: Quote

MPACUK does not know how to be polite, that's why a lot of people just ignore them, there main leaders lack wisdom and have little chracteristics of a model muslim, shouting and being rude etc. The political side is all good, raising awareness etc.
— nazir khan


This may well be true - but then it is duty of muslims to help them with their imaan and knowledge - if it is lacking.

People ignore them - this is not what muslims should be doing! Join them and help them - they are your brothers.
(6) 2008-04-13 08:41:15
Barbarossa: Quote

MPACUK does not know how to be polite, that's why a lot of people just ignore them, there main leaders lack wisdom and have little chracteristics of a model muslim, shouting and being rude etc. The political side is all good, raising awareness etc.
— nazir khan


what a stupid ignorant comment. The thugs doing the Mawlid get physical - its caught on camera and this idiot poster can only talk about mpac being polite. Are you blind ???

The only people who should be ignored are people who are apologists for thug like behavious and that includes you!
(7) 2008-04-13 12:36:16
sceptic: Quote

How sad. Isn't there a hadith that says he who does not concern himself with the affairs of the ummah is not one of us?

What is really sad is that muslims have been so intimidated by the government and the government controled media that they now feel that someone handing out leaflets is an extremist and should be handed over to the police.



(8) 2008-04-13 20:09:55
anas: Quote

i agreed with nazir comments, i am sure he doesn't mean to that particular mawlid issue rather general view of public towards MPAC. for ur info, i did distribute MPAC leaflet for this election, but i don't agree with some MPAC approach
(9) 2008-04-14 09:32:40
Tahira: Quote

i agreed with nazir comments, i am sure he doesn't mean to that particular mawlid issue rather general view of public towards MPAC. for ur info, i did distribute MPAC leaflet for this election, but i don't agree with some MPAC approach
— anas


I've got a lot of respect for the approach Anas takes - you don't have to agree with an organisation 100% on everything in order to help them in a good cause!

If only more Muslims made sure that our points of difference don't prevent us working together - after all our enemies stand shoulder to shoulder in attacking us!

(10) 2008-04-14 12:33:36
ali akbar: Quote

i agreed with nazir comments, i am sure he doesn't mean to that particular mawlid issue rather general view of public towards MPAC. for ur info, i did distribute MPAC leaflet for this election, but i don't agree with some MPAC approach
— anas


really confused. mpacuk get attacked and for giving out election leaflets, mpacuk get attacked for opposing jack straw, mpacuk, get attacked for asking a mosquue to let sisters pray, and its mpacuks 'general view of the public' thats the problem.

the problem is the public, after all if they had sorted out their own backyard there would be no mpac.
(11) 2008-04-15 07:59:25
Imran Khan: Quote

Mawlid should be deplored full stop. Historically, it appeared hundreds of years after the death of our beloved Prophet (saw) when the religion had been PERFECTED (Qur'an 5:3). How on earth can we just make up our worship like these Brelwis do? And if they say it isn't worship, then why do it? Why waste your previous time? Rather, do those things that are beneficial.

Good on your MPACUK for pulling the head out for these Brelwis and help them see that there are more pressing matters
(12) 2008-04-22 09:56:30
Please keep your comments brief and on topic, and remember that this is not a discussion thread.
Name :
E-mail :
Comment(s) :
Verify :
What color is often used to describe the sky ?



Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Live!Facebook!Technorati!Spurl!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!