| US spies give shock verdict on Iran threat |
|
|
| Tuesday, 04 December 2007 | |
|
US intelligence agencies undercut the White House yesterday by disclosing for the first time that Iran has not been pursuing a nuclear weapons development programme for the past four years. The secret report, which was declassified yesterday and published, marked a significant shift from previous estimates. "Tehran's decision to halt its nuclear weapons programme suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005," it said. The disclosure makes it harder for President George Bush, to justify a military strike against Iran before he leaves office next year. It also makes it more difficult to persuade Russia and China to join the US, Britain and France in imposing a new round of sanctions on Tehran. Bush and vice-president Dick Cheney have been claiming without equivocation that Tehran is bent on achieving a nuclear weapon, with the president warning in October of the risk of a third world war. They were briefed on the national intelligence estimate (NIE) on Wednesday. The White House national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, at a press conference yesterday, denied there were echoes of the intelligence failure over Iraq's phantom weapons of mass destruction. He said that Iran was "one of a handful of the hardest intelligence targets going" and the new intelligence had only arrived in the past few months. As soon as it did, both the president and Congress had been briefed. He warned that there would be a tendency now to think "the problem is less bad than we thought, let's relax. Our view is that would be a mistake." The NIE, which pulls together the work of the 16 American intelligence agencies, is entitled Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities. It concluded: "We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme." It had not been restarted as of the middle of this year. In a startling admission from an administration that regularly portrays Iran as the biggest threat to the Middle East and the world, the NIE said: "We do not know whether [Iran] currently intends to develop nuclear weapons." That contradicts the assessment two years ago that baldly stated that Tehran was "determined to develop nuclear weapons". The British government, which is planning to discuss the report with its US counterparts during the next few days, has also repeatedly said it suspects President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government of seeking a nuclear weapons capability. It will claim that the weapons halt shows that diplomacy - in particular the threat of sanctions - can work. The weapons halt roughly coincided with a visit by British, French and German foreign ministers to Tehran in October 2003. The Iranian government has insisted throughout that it is only pursuing a civilian nuclear programme. Although a halt to the nuclear weapons programme is significant, the NIE is far from a clean bill of health for Iran. Tehran is pushing ahead with its uranium enrichment programme, which has only limited civilian use and could be quickly converted to nuclear military use. The NIE warned that Iran could secure a nuclear weapon by 2010. The US state department's intelligence and research office, one of the agencies involved, said the more likely timescale would be 2013. All the agencies concede that Iran may not have enough enriched uranium until after 2015. The White House will continue to try to intensify international pressure on Iran. Russia and China, two of the permanent members of the UN security council, have scuppered attempts by the US over the past six months to impose tough new sanctions on Iran. The decision to publish the NIE is aimed at trying to recover the public credibility lost when the agencies wrongly claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in the years leading up to 2003. Ewen MacAskill in Washington Tuesday December 4, 2007 Readers have left 16 comments.
shem:
Quote
Surely we don't all now believe US intelligence, do we? Since when?
Besides they have pointed out that with uranium enrichment continuing apace Iran will have enough for weapons (if that is their purpose) anytime between 2009 and 2015). So basically - they haven't got a clue. And this 'Intelligence is based on 2003 and released for Washington politicking purposes.
(1)
2007-12-04 11:51:48
Zak:
Quote
Forget about the US!!! Have you seen the zionist response, they're absolutely livid!
(2)
2007-12-04 14:41:07
wendy mann:
Quote
not exactly a shock verdict .. and anyway they do leave the door open for military strikes directed at the enrichment facilities.
all sensible us government predictions suggest iran is at the very least 10 years away from having enough uranium and then another 5 years or so in having the capability to use it in a missile.
(3)
2007-12-04 14:56:55
I Sidat:
Quote
its amazing how the perpatrators of war suddenly find themselves red in the face.
Knowing Bush and clinton even obama they might go to war anywar after all the SIraeli lobby is far more important that innocent lives being killed
(4)
2007-12-04 15:32:05
you muppet:
Quote
the iranians are crazy, the last thing they want to do is stop enrichment.
get a bomb quick and then and only then will they be safe. Israel and its under cover lobbyist will push for a war, and pretend its in the interest in the US and UK. They expect the Goyam to fall for it, and the only time the Goyam wont is if Iran a nuclear deterent. Then and only then will Israel be forced to behave.
(5)
2007-12-04 17:26:00
TeddyBear:
Quote
its amazing how the perpatrators of war suddenly find themselves red in the face. — I SidatKnowing Bush and clinton even obama they might go to war anywar after all the SIraeli lobby is far more important that innocent lives being killed According to Iran an Islamic dominance is more important than the lives of Israelis who they would like to "wipe from the pages of history"
(6)
2007-12-04 17:32:07
TeddyBear:
Quote
the iranians are crazy...... — you muppetNo, stop there. You had it right. BTW what's a "Goyam". Do I eat it or play sport with it. I have to admit I don't have a large Muslim vocabulary.
(7)
2007-12-04 17:33:39
shan:
Quote
do not worry if the americans want to attack iran when did the truth ever come in the way of americans invading and slaughtering others.
it maybe the intelligance agencies have had enough of being scapegoats for busghes warmongering and are letting the averagea american know what the reality is. zionists must be having a bad time with them being implicated in selling honours and breaking funding laws and now being undercut by american intelligence which destroys their statements that iran will obtain the bomb in the next year or two and has to be stopped now. finally it could be a ploy as part of special ops.
(8)
2007-12-04 17:52:46
Zubair:
Quote
Oh no!
What will war-mongering neo cons do now? Time to scrape the barrell I guess
(9)
2007-12-04 20:46:31
Bananas:
Quote
Chances are I am wrong. But my first thought on hearing this was that it was designed to lower Iran's guard before an imminent attack. Catching them with their pants down, so to speak.
(10)
2007-12-04 22:07:56
Barbarossa:
Quote
its amazing how the perpatrators of war suddenly find themselves red in the face. — TeddyBearKnowing Bush and clinton even obama they might go to war anywar after all the SIraeli lobby is far more important that innocent lives being killed According to Iran an Islamic dominance is more important than the lives of Israelis who they would like to "wipe from the pages of history" This Goyim would like to ask - "didnt Israel wipe of the Palestinians of the pages of history and their very land...oh i forgot YOUR God said it was ok to do that.."
(11)
2007-12-04 23:23:24
TeddyBear:
Quote
Oh no! — ZubairWhat will war-mongering neo cons do now? Time to scrape the barrell I guess Well at this time Hamas is a bigger and more immediate threat so I woul advocate an invasion of Gaza and cleaning up the nest. The advantage will be to rattle Syria and Iran into a rage and then they will reveal their hand. Anyway, Syria was secretly developing a nuke facility (removed by Israel) so we just need to find the secret Iran sites.
(12)
2007-12-04 23:43:40
I Sidat:
Quote
The threat to Israel is a smoke screen, the reality is there is no threat to Israel and that's evident
(13)
2007-12-04 23:56:52
you muppet:
Quote
Teddybear,
I agree they are crazy, crazy enough to give Israel 3 bloody nosses (all of them ib Lebonan), without a single Iranian getting involved. They are mad for stopping their nuclear programe, only a fully armed nuclear state can stop another war.
(14)
2007-12-05 09:19:00
shem:
Quote
It doesn't really matter what US intelligence thinks. Israel will continue to monitor the situation and it will be left to them to deal with it when/if Iran gets too close to completing the programme. Check out yesterdays's Jeruslaem Post - Army Chierfs talk candidly of what may need to be done.
(15)
2007-12-05 10:59:35
jack maclean:
Quote
Weapons of mass destruction may not have been discovered in Iraq, but, it seems, the invasion of Iraq panicked the Iran into halting their WMD programme in Iran. The world must surely be a safer place.
(16)
2007-12-06 21:22:43
|






Intelligence agencies say Tehran halted weapons programme in 2003.











