Login to post comments | No account yet? Register here
| Free the Egyptian blogger! But... |
|
|
| Sunday, 25 February 2007 | |
|
At the same time, I can't help but note that Nabeel is far from the only political activist in Egyptian jails right now. The Egyptian regime is engaging in an unprecedented crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood. Hundreds of its members have been arrested and referred to the notorious state security courts, their businesses closed down and their bank accounts frozen, without even a trace of due process. Some Muslim Brothers are even bloggers, if that's what it takes to get people to care. Because not many people seem to. This selective outrage, where Westerners care about one anti-Islamist blogger but can't be bothered about equally arbitrary and illiberal repression of hundreds of Islamists, only reinforces general skepticism that this isn't really about freedom, human rights, or democracy. It's just like the American focus on the release of jailed liberal politician Ayman Nour as a litmus test for the Egyptian regime (one which it continues to fail, by the way, without seeming to suffer the slightest penalty). I can not exaggerate how many times I hear from Arabs and Muslims that America's campaign against Hamas after it won fair elections and its blind eye to Mubarak's campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood proves once and for all the fundamental hypocrisy of its democracy talk. I am not criticizing anyone for rallying to Nabeel's or Nour's defense. They should. But they should also see this as part of a comprehensive regime crackdown on Egyptian political opposition, with the attack on the Muslim Brotherhood the leading edge of the regime's anti-democratic backlash. People who claim to care about Egyptian reform, democratization, and human rights should take a slightly wider view of the problem than the travails of one anti-Islamist blogger or one liberal politician. Source: abuaardvark.typepad.com One person has commented on this article.
Andy:
Quote
The 'West' is hypocritical. Yes this true in some respects. However the "selective outrage" is largely warranted in this case, I would suspect.
An Egypt governed by the Muslim Brotherhood, whether democratically elected or not, would be, in the fullness of time, an Egypt living under a tyranny. This man would be arrested under a Muslim Brotherhood government too. You do know that don't you? To pretend otherwise is naïve.
(1)
2007-02-25 09:39:56
|




It's 









