| V For Vendetta Blogger Exposes The Sun Newspaper |
|
|
| Tuesday, 24 October 2006 | |
|
Anyone remember this story from a couple of weeks ago? They were yesterday forced to look elsewhere to live — after top brass warned them against inflaming racial violence near the Queen’s Windsor Castle home. It’s from The Scum of course - who could possibly fail to recognise their unmistakeable style even before one reads on to discover that… Louts struck two days after the four arrived in uniform in an Army Land Rover to view it. The source said: “A gang of local Muslims set about keeping them away. They hurled bricks through the windows and then wrote offensive graffiti across the front of the house.” The vile messages included one in 4ft letters on the drive — warning: “F*** off”. Sources inside Windsor’s Combermere Barracks — where the officers are based — confirmed Muslims had made calls threatening the men. Well, that clinches, it doesn’t? Sources inside the very barracks where the men are based actually confimed that Muslims had made calls threatening the men…
With news like that that, who could be surprised to find that Shadow immigation minister, Damian Green (MP for Ashford, Kent), thought that this was a "shocking development", while another Tory rent-a-mouth, Philip Davies, (MP for Shipley, Yorkshire) is reported to have said…
Strangely enough, when it was looking for comments on this story, The Scum appears not have bothered to contact the MP for Windsor, Berkshire, the actual constitutency in which this attack took place, which would be fairly normal practice… perhaps The Scum were a little less certain as to the reaction they’d get from Adam Afriyie MP. There is, as the more perceptive amongst might have guessed, just one minor little problem with this story… …its a pile of complete and utter bullshit! ‘No religion was labelled’ responsible for vandalism The soldiers also discovered that several of the windows had been broken. An MoD source told the Express last week there had been phone calls made to Combermere Barracks in Windsor where the soldiers were stationed. The caller said that the soldiers were not welcome because houses in the road are expensive - around £600,000 - and that the soldiers presence might lower property values. Newspaper reports claimed that the obscenities and vandalism were the work of Muslims. The report claimed this was the view of detectives investigating the incident. Thames Valley Police have now said they are not pursing this line of inquiry. Detective Chief Inspector Stephen Reschwamm said: "This incident was reported in a national newspaper reports, alleging that Muslim youths were responsible for causing the damage to stop four soldiers moving in. "I would like to emphasise that, although one of our initial lines of inquiry was to consider possible racially aggravated circumstances, we never labelled any particular faith or religion as being responsible." He added: "Inquiries carried out to date conclude that there is no evidence to suggest that this was racially motivated. The MoD has also informed me that Combermere Barracks did not receive any threatening calls from Muslims or people claiming to be Muslims in relation to this incident." So the actual story here turns out not be about roving gangs of Muslim youths victimising ‘our brave lads’ but about a bit of vigilante action by one of the local snobs who thinks that having ’squaddies’, even the kind that have been to Sandhurst and serve in a premier cavalry regiment, living in their street will only lower the tone of the area.
And the views of the local Muslim community in Datchet on this?
If not, then this report may illuminate matters for you - [link to icBerkshire story] Regards.
I await her response with considerable interest, particular having discovered this little report in the Media Guadian dated a mere two days after the Datchet story…
Baig has to wait for her byline until page nine. Curiously enough, while Baig’s story still appears on The Scum’s website, Julie’s front page ‘exclusive’ is nowhere to be found… Should I get a reply from Julie, you will, of course, be able to read it here… Oh, about the title of this piece, its by an obscure writer(?) by the name of ‘Barson Maith’ of whom posterity appears aware only because the verse from which the line is taken was included by Ambrose Bierce in his defintion of ‘Reporter’ in his Devil’s Dictionary.
REPORTER, n. The difference between a Muslim Hate preacher and a non Muslim racist one, is we shun our preachers, they give them jobs in powerful newspapers.
source : http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk Readers have left 9 comments.
Abu Halimah:
Quote
take a picture of a junior royal family member, and the papers are hauled in front of the Press complaints body. Blatently lie to demonise muslims, directly creating a climate conducive to attacks on muslims, and what happens? The rules of the game have indeed changed!
(1)
2006-10-25 23:31:35
Zara:
Quote
I think MPACUK must be doing something right, it's annoying the racists of this country! This discuusion forum gets a lot on intolernat posts!
Well as they say: the truth hurts!
(2)
2006-10-26 15:40:31
abuyusuf:
Quote
MPACUK, i challenge you to do something about this. Let' see if you can take this as far as legally possible. is there anything that can be done to bring these people to book?
(3)
2006-10-27 15:31:33
PresidentWPM:
Quote
Zionist strategy:
Publish a false story about Mulims using contrived evidence. Muslims get attacked. Publish a retraction and even an apology. Muslim injuries don't go away. Job done. Many people wouldn't even read the retraction and will go on thinking that the Muslims are guilty. Job done. We need to highlight these injustices and bring them to the attention of the law and bang these people up to rights. The Pres.
(4)
2006-10-27 22:25:59
Shirin:
Quote
Brother AbuYusuf:
I chanllenge you to help MPACUK make it happen by either giving them a regular donation or helping them fundraise. Do you accept this challenge?
(5)
2006-10-28 00:24:16
Umar Yasin:
Quote
Salam, I think the best thing to be would be to complain initially to the Press Complaints Commission. There might be an argument for a defamation action against The Sun, as if as you state, the Muslims in Datchet are so small, they could possibly argue that they are idenitifable and bring a class action. Perhaps media lawyers should be consulted as to a possible cause of action. I will try and ask my lecturers at Bar School for advice. I think it is shocking news, and something should definitely be done.
Wasalam, Umar Yasin Editor, Onevoiceuk.com
(6)
2006-10-28 00:54:22
Al South:
Quote
Well researched piece exposing tabloid lies. The only problem is there are millions who lap up this spoon fed propaganda to reinforce their own racist prejudices.
No doubt some neanderthal racist thug will be reprinting these type of lies in their leaflets and newspapers to gain votes. Muslims are being portrayed as 'the enemy within' for the political gain of certain failing political parties.
(7)
2006-10-29 09:24:41
abs:
Quote
this is what I call an investigation those politician should be ashamed of them selves, they are causing all the 'race tension' through their lies
(8)
2006-10-29 19:21:14
Africana:
Quote
Shrin I echo your sentiments!
Brother AbuYusuf MPACUK needs funds to defend our people. Donate generously. Umar Yasin I am warmed by your comments. This is what we need desperately. UNITY. UNITY frightens the neo cohens. The EU has a common policy on trade, finance, judiciary …… and they just do not want the Muslims to have UNITY so they get their proxy rulers like Mubarak & the cursed house of Saud to create disunity and make provocative, incendiary comments about Shia & Sunni. Keep spreading the good work. Compliments to all three of you; MPACUK, Shrin & Umar Yasin
(9)
2006-10-30 13:42:59
|
Search MPACUK.org
| Birmingham |
| London* |
| Manchester |
| Leeds |
| Oxford* |
| *Links Coming Soon |











