Who is supporting the rebels against the Sudanese gov.?

Who is paying for the rebels military hardware?

The the Sudanese gov. suported a cease fire brokered by UN while rebels refused it, why?

The cabal want sudan to go down the Iraq root? but Iraq gone sour on them so plans for Sudan were delayed but they are gaining momentum now making up for lost time.

The Darfur rebels ... imagine the scots taking up arms against the british for North Sea oil rights, you can't, so why can the rebels do that in Sudan.

***Sumit fishy going on over there***

Go America Go ...Go in.. there is more oil over there in Sudan.. as if they do not know that already

They do not need MPAC to prompt them to go in they are just biting their time after they hatched this conflict

SAVE your breath MPAC you are barking up a wrong tree

The individual who wrote this article knows very little of the politics and conflict in Sudan. This article is a propagandist piece for the USA. Many Muslims have been duped with misinformation. The article makes the mistake right from the start that it's a battle between Arabs and blacks. Anyway I am diametrically opposed to any UN force going into Sudan to dismantle the government and secure the oil rich area which will eventually force a split and division of the country. An agreement has already been reached with the southern area of Sudan which will eventually become autonomous with its own government in the next five years.

If an argument is made for a unified Muslim force to go in and stabilise the skirmishes between the rebel forces and that of the government, then I am in agreement. Sudan should fight tooth and nail to stop an unwelcome intervention in their sovereign country. Sudanese people will have a lot to loose if their own country is no longer in their hands. Similar situation as that of Afghanistan and Iraq will take place where puppet regimes will be heaped on top of the people without them benefiting an iota.

The Chinese have already invested 4 billion with the Sudanese government to explore the oil rich areas in Sudan. This explain why the western government and in particular the USA is out to demonize the Sudanese Government. The USA bombed a pharmaceutical company in Sudan during the Clinton administration which made Sudan even more un-inclined to do business with the USA. Some say this is a century for the Chinese and others wish not to see this happen. Whatever the case, the USA will not have an open confrontation with the Chinese but any other weaker nation who will deal with china will be demonised and overthrown.

What is a little known fact is that Western based oil exploration companies, during the 1990's paid the bill for ethnic cleansing of the Sudanese villagers in the South of Sudan, to be rehoused away from the oil rich areas. Yet the Sudanese central government is being blamed for what was essentially an economic decision based on the prospect of discovering "OIL". The Chinese and other countries only got in on the act during the early part of this new Century and have not played any part in the ethnic cleansing. Suggest that you look into the past records of the British and USA oil exploration companies involvement throughout the 1990's in Africa to establish these and other facts. The Sudanese Government are not the root of the problem albeit party to it.

We must be very careful not to fall in with the US/Zionist propaganda. Whilst we as Muslims/humans should strongly condemn actions by all parties that result in killing, raping and violence in Darfur, it must be known that US has been arming the anti-Sudanese militia for years. It is little secret the animosity US has against the Islamic government of Sudan, the largest African and some claim very oil rich country.

Here, below an article on the subject quotes expert, Alex de Waal on Sudan:

The situation in Darfur is tragic, but it is not genocide - oil may be the real target of those seeking military intervention. According to Alex de Waal, the "world authority" on Sudan, Characterising the Darfur war as 'Arabs' versus 'Africans' obscures the reality. Darfur's Arabs are black, indigenous, African and Muslim - just like Darfur's non-Arabs"

Clearly, this is not just about Arabs Vs Africans. Both sides are Muslims. If the Africans were Muslims and the Janzawid were US supporting regime, make no mistake, the African Muslims would have been called terrorists for taking up arms against the Sudanese government. It is also clear, US has a new way of spreading it power and influence. Like in Lebanon, it is using UN intervention marshalling posse of US friendly, mainly NATO countries to neutralise regimes of unfriendly Muslim countries. This is a new recipe, despite Hezbullah's claim of victory in the recent war, has worked out well for USUKISRAEL.

UN intervention in the guise of humanitarian grounds will invariably lead to splitting Sudan and imposition of a USIsrael friendly regime, like the Kurds in Iraq. When a senior UN diplomat accused US recently of using UN as an extension of its foreign policy, he may have foreseen this policy.