| The Persecution of the Palestinians |
|
|
| Monday, 05 June 2006 | |
|
“Why do they hate us?” So stunned Americans asked, after 9/11, when we learned that across the Arab world, many were saying, “The Americans had it coming.” For a textbook example of why we are hated, consider Gaza and the West Bank. There, a brutal Israeli/U.S.-led cutoff in aid has been imposed on the Palestinians for voting the wrong way in a free election. Immediately after Hamas’s victory, Israel halted the $55 million a month the Palestinian Authority received as its share of tax and customs revenue. Israel demanded Europe and the U.S. also end all aid to the PA until Hamas renounces terror, recognizes Israel, and disarms. President Bush, though he was conducting a worldwide crusade for democracy and had urged that the Palestinian elections be held and Hamas participate, obediently complied. For months now, U.S. and European aid to the PA, half its budget, has been halted. The early returns are in. “Surgeons at Gaza’s biggest hospital,” says the Financial Times, “have suspended non-essential surgery for lack of sutures, laboratory kits and anesthetics.” Environmental protection agency workers have no money for petrol to monitor sewage and industrial waste entering the water supply. Some 150,000 civil servants, 60,000 of them armed security personnel, have gone unpaid for months. Supermarkets have to extend credit to customers who have no money for food. The Washington Post relates an incident that gives a flavor of what is happening. “In Gaza’s gold market Monday, Nahed al-Zayim stared at the wedding ring her husband, a Palestinian police officer, gave her six years ago. She had placed it on a glass counter offering it for sale, joining several other wives of public employees who had not been paid in two months. “Her head covered by a black veil, Zayim said she needed the proceeds from her ring to buy diapers and milk supplements for her three children, including Hazem, 4, who tugged at her tunic in the afternoon bustle. ‘This is the last one, we have no more,’ Zayim, 28, said of her ring.” Woodrow Wilson called sanctions “the silent, deadly remedy.” Its victims are always the sick, the elderly, the women, and the children. In March, the World Bank predicted the aid cutoff would lead to a 30 percent fall in average personal incomes among the Palestinians. The bank now considers that prediction “too rosy” and expects “the worst year in the West Bank and Gaza’s recent dismal economic history.” Already, violent clashes have broken out between Hamas and Fatah. There is a danger of collapse of the Palestinian Authority, chaos, and a need for the Israeli army to intervene anew to restore order. Finally, May 9, under European pressure, the U.S. relented and a trickle of aid began to flow. Query: who, besides al-Qaeda and recruiters of suicide bombers, can conceivably benefit from persecuting the Palestinian people like this? Does President Bush or Condi Rice think the Palestinians will respect an America that did this to their children, after we urged this election, called for Hamas to participate, and preached our devotion to democracy? “The aid cut-off appears to be increasing anti-U.S. sentiment here,” writes the Post’s Scott Wilson, quoting 33-year-old pharmacist Mustafa Hasoona: “The problem is the West, not us. If they don’t respect democracy, they shouldn’t call for it. We are with this government we elected. I voted for it.” According to the Financial Times, Hamas is winning converts for refusing to buckle. Said Khalil Abu Leila, a Hamas leader, “They have misunderstood the Arab mentality. As long as the pressure increases on Hamas, the more popular it will become.” The White House says we don’t negotiate with terrorists. But when we had to, we did. FDR and Truman summited with Stalin at Yalta and Potsdam. Nixon met with Mao in Beijing. Kissinger negotiated with the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese at Paris. Bush I allied with Assad in the Gulf War. Clinton had Arafat to the White House too many times to count. Rabin and Peres shared a Nobel Prize with Arafat. Netanyahu gave him Hebron. Barak offered him 95 percent of the West Bank. Bush’s agents negotiated with the architect of the Lockerbie massacre to persuade Colonel Khaddafi to give up his WMD. In 2004, Bush’s men called it a victory for Bush diplomacy. Khaddafi’s regime had been at the top of the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terror. The purpose of U.S.-Israeli policy today is to punish the Palestinians for how they voted and to force Hamas to yield or to collapse its government. How does such a policy win hearts and minds for America? Terrorism has been described as waging war on innocents to break their political leaders. Is that not a fair description of what we are doing to the Palestinians? No wonder they hate us.
June 5, 2006 Issue Readers have left 8 comments.
Joe:
Quote
I thought you guys didn't support terrorism.
Why should the U.S. and Israel support it?
(1)
2006-06-06 02:38:55
Abdul Rahman:
Quote
I think MPAC ought to tell us the identity of the author of this piece. It is Pat Buchanan, a man who describes Hitler at a great, courageous leader.
Once again the cause of the Palestinians is being dragged into the gutter, doing them incalculable long-term harm. The Palestinian leader Husseini spent World War II in Berlin while the Zionists were mobilising for the allies. The long term impact on associating the Jews with good and the Arabs with evil was enormous. And yet these mistakes continue to be made, and they will have an impact long, long into the future. Looking at the substance of the article, when the Muslim world is so vast and so rich in resources, it is absurd to hold the Israelis or Americans to account for not funding the Palestinian health budget. Remember, the infant mortality rate of Israeli Palestinians is one third of that of Palestinians in Jordan or Syria. So much for Zionist 'genocide'. Every ridiculous argument against Israel weakens the Palestinians.
(2)
2006-06-06 07:14:12
S. Benari:
Quote
The Hamas etc response is highly illustrative of the political immaturity that that faction within the Palestinian community continues to exhibit, encouraged by a number of external agencies and groups.
Far from not respecting Palestinian democracy, Israel, the USA and the EU have respected totally the expression of the will of the Palestinian people. The Hamas Charter and its other publications makes it clear that it does not recognise the legitmacy of Israel in any form. It makes it clear that it will NEVER enter into a final peace treaty with Israel. Thus Hamas as the legal government of Palestine does not recognise the validity of any of the Security Council Resolutions, neither does it recognise Oslo etc. As such Hamas seeks reversion to a state of war between the Muslims and Christian inhabitants of the region and the Jewish inhabitants with the object of destroying the autonomous entity (Israel) that the Jews have created, expelling as a minimum the immigrant Jewish population and establishing a state founded on Islamic principles, where non-Muslims are assigned formal Dhimmi status. (It can be expected that the Bahai population will be slaughtered as apostates under this arrangement) Not unsurprisingly the Israelis reject this vision and are not prepared to facilitate its development. The US & EU equally recongise that this plan will result in the outbreak of massive bloodshed between Hamas supporting Palestinians and a coalition of former Israelis on the other (Jews, Bedouin, Druze, Circassians & Bahais). If the current Israel ceases to be a country that would still leave the predominantly Jewish enclave in possession of an arsenal of considerable size and the means to maintain military supremacy. As is evident the Jews etc will not go quietly into oblivion, and thus we can expect them to resist with all the means at their disposal any attempts to consign them to such. This ranges from minor embargoes to total war. based on the current balance of power this would result in a second Nakhba in which the Palestinians would not just suffer the trauma of flight, but face the onslaught of an armed force of massive proportions. No international body would be willing to intervene physically to protect the Palestinians in this circumstance. A few days ago Palestinian forces fired a Katyushka rocket into Israel narrowly missing the Israeli Minister for Defence's house. These attacks are a daily occurrence. Of course the Israelis retaliate, what on earth does anyone expect. It is now time for the Palestinians to grow up, together with their so-called friends & allies around the world. If we want an independent state, we had better think just how we are going to get one. Violence is not the way, and has never been the way. For all the brave rhetoric and bluster, the Jews have won every battle - the reality is that the Arab warrior is just a little boy playing soldiers in the dirt. The only weapon available is non-violence, against which the Israelis have no defense.
(3)
2006-06-06 07:31:22
Stuart Lionhart:
Quote
What a sad world we live in.
Awful and anti- human Zionists destroy familes and lands of peoples who centuries before them provided the Jews with safe havens and safety. Their treasonous brethren in the West peddle lies and filth to further push their agenda of total global domination. The world is truely in the grip of lying and scheming people which is of biblical proprotions. Even Isreal isn't 'Isreal'..it is the synagogue of Satan, the throne of Lucifer. "By their Deeds shall Ye know them". Oh yes, their deeds are there for all to see. God protect the Palestinians from the New Babylon.
(4)
2006-06-06 11:56:42
AK:
Quote
Salaamz. I think to blame the Palestinians only, like S. Benari does so eloquently, or to blame the Israelis only like in the article is great folly. By doing so, you are exempting one party from its actions completley by labelling their actians as appropriate reactions for which they cannot be completely held responsible for, rather than perceiving each sides' actions as accountable and consequential.
For the most part Israel is at blame for its bullying tactics, seeing that it is the stronger of the 2 parties, and yet there is no remorse on the treatment of the Palestinians. The constant bullying of the Palestinian leaders is a real sham, and then to claim that the Plaestinians "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity" just takes the cake. Hypocricy right throughout - and this cannot be covered with the feeble excuse of "protecting the only democracy in the region" when there is undoubtedly biased treatment of minorities within Israel as second-hand citizens. Some democracy. On the other hand - the Palestinians are not without blame either. That goes for the whole Arab world. The level of corruption in the government authorities is disgraceful, not because it is present - since in today's world there is virtually no government that has not tasted corruption, but because of the situation and circumstances this government is facing and is in. Hamas fighting Fatah, the corruption of Fatah - this inbread fighting is really shameful. Atleast show a united front when facing the oppressor. The Arab world should also take blame for the current state of the Palsetinians, since it was these selfish Arabs who didn't bolster a stronger and louder enough voice to raise concerns over the nullification of any Palestinian state when Britain refused (failed) to recognise a Palestinian people. Each one for his own - and is still the same today - or else with all the vast resources and wealth of the Arab World, why would the Palestinains need to go unpaid and hungry for months in the presence of the Arab "brethren"? And you will still see people looking for sympathy and support from Muslims and non-muslims from around the world. IT should be obligatory on muslims anyway to be concerned with any issues involving muslims - but why aren't these same people begging for the support and sympathy form the Arabs themselves? This is an internal problem - and can be dealt with internally if the Arabs wanted. But, as we see the turmoil continues . . . The best possible solution to the conflict at hand is for both sides to comet o terms with reality and respect each other. To the Palestinians - they have to realise that Israel is here to stay - even if it was created illegitimately. It would unconceivable to ethnically cleanse the land again off the Jews to get rid of Israel - so they have to accept that Israel will exist with or without their blessings. Better with then. To the Israelis - they have to realise that there is going to be and always will be a Palestinian people - and hence the need for an independant Palestinian State. So, they need to get serious about talking peace and determining agreeable notions of a 2-state solution. The onus is definitely on the Israelis since they are the stronger of the 2 involved and can claim some sort of diktat. In order for this to happen, the land grab must stop, and the wall must be abolished as a sign of trust and reconciliation.
(5)
2006-06-06 14:54:00
S. Benari:
Quote
AK, you misunderstand me. I do not blame the Palestinians exclusively. I am perfectly aware how bloody and brutal the Israelis can be. But there is no point continually berating them for not being "nice & kind" to the Palestinians, when the current democratically elected Palestinian government proposes war against them.
Throughout my life, now 50 years, I have watched those that have grabbed centre stage, and through the use of weapons asserted their authority, lead the Palestinian people from disaster to disaster. The disastrous factionalism that has split the Palestinian nation time and time again, leaving it weak and vulnerable to not only Israel but also the Arab allies. The policy of Sumud denied any chance to develop political experience and the seeds of autonomy and a nation state. And what little autonomy there was in the West Bank and Gaza, was worn away by Fatah oppression and then finally destroyed by Fatah's exploitation of the first Intifadeh. I remember clearly when the Palestinian policemen failed to come to work due to fear of execution. That brought the Israeli soldiers ever closer into the lives of ordinary Palestinians. I watched as after every explosion of violence the number of Palestinians able to work in Israel diminished, and all it brought was poverty. And the Oslo and Fatah arrived. All hopes of effective government and the rule of law crumbled to sand. The money was stolen and spent in Paris jewellery shops. Strange rumours circulated about the inner circle amassing vast land banks instead of giving land to the ordinary people; of chop shops, processing cars stolen in Israel, being owned by the few that held the monopoly to issue new registration plates; of people with the cement monoploy selling concrete to build the wall. Most of all I remember how 70% of Israelis voted for peace and talked of a time when the IDF wouldn't need conscripts and there would be jobs for everyone. At that time they would have given us whatever we wanted if we could make peace come true. But we couldn't keep our fingers off the trigger and put the gun down. And we couldn't stop lying to others and to ourselves, we couldn't face the truth that Fatah and Hamas etc had no dream of peace, where children would play together and neighbours might chat again. All hope slowly vanished like so much smoke blown away with the coming Khamsin. I don't seek to blame the Israelis, because every time Likud needed opinion to swing their way, we did whatever was needed - another bomb - another shooting.
(6)
2006-06-06 18:29:19
Joe:
Quote
Dear S. BenariYour post captures a esential aspect of the Oslo disaster that is lost on most palistinains.Isreals both Arab and Jewwere so hopeful for the future of palistine and the region.If only the palistinains understood what was lost.
(7)
2006-06-08 05:59:03
message to jo:
Quote
A monkey is calling you by screaming oohhohhohohooaaahhaghaghhahg eeeeeee
(8)
2006-06-20 07:43:06
|

















