| Israel Must Renounce Violence |
|
|
| Thursday, 18 May 2006 | |
|
Israel’s-state violence has the advantage to be condoned by Western (US and EU) governments and ignored or distorted by all mainstream media. Yet, Palestinian self-defence and miniscule retaliations, including resistance to Israel’s illegal occupation is magnified and condemned as “terrorism”.
Israel’s-state violence has the advantage to be condone by Western (US and EU) governments and ignored or distorted by all mainstream media. Yet, Palestinian self-defence and miniscule retaliations, including resistance to Israel’s illegal occupation is magnified and condemned as “terrorism”. To show who has the uncontested monopoly on violence, a comparison of the situation on the ground is necessary. According to the International Middle East Media Centre (IMEMC), the month of April has been the bloodiest month since August 2005. The Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) murdered 36 Palestinian civilians, including three children in the West Bank and Gaza; more than 300 Palestinian civilians were arrested. Since last January, the IOF killed more than 50 Palestinians, including several children in cold blood and wounded many. Indeed, “over 22 times more Palestinian children were killed [by Israelis soldiers] than Israeli children [killed by Palestinians]” [2]. According to Israeli human-rights group B'Tselem, since autumn 2000, the number of Israelis killed by Palestinians has totalled 998 and the number of Palestinians killed by Israelis has totalled 3,466. In addition, Palestinians are portrayed as cold-blooded suicide bombers by the Western media around the world in order to distort the facts and depict Palestinian self-defence as “terrorism”, while avoid associating Israel’s greater crimes against the Palestinian civilians with terrorism. This distortion of facts has concealed and covered Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people and Israel’s serious threat to peace in the region. In the West, the US in particular, Israel is portrayed as the victim of terrorism not the perpetuator of terrorism. Many of the Palestinian attacks were Resistance operations against Israeli soldiers and involved no suicides at all. Suicide bombing is used as a form of desperate retaliation. Other attacks were with harmless home-made rockets (the Qassam Rockets). Israeli strikes were with U.S.-made F16 and thousands of bombs dropped on towns and villages indiscriminately killing innocent Palestinian civilians. Everyday, Israeli Occupation forces kill Palestinians, demolished their houses steal their land and increase the size of the “Jewish-only state” with tacit support of Western governments. Israel is not fighting terrorism; Israel is the mother of all acts of terrorism. Resistance by ‘all means available’ is legitimate right of self-defence enshrined in the right of people aspiring for liberation and national independence. In other words, the Palestinian resistance against Israel’s daily terror is legitimate resistance. The Israeli are the aggressors and the occupiers, and they have no right to terrorise the defenceless Palestinian population. For nearly forty years, Palestinians have been living under Israel’s brutal occupation. It is the longest and most brutal military occupation in history. Israel can end the violence by simply ending the occupation and removing the illegal colonies (settlements) from Palestinian land. In addition to Israel’s daily terror against the Palestinians, Israel forces continue to annex more Palestinian land and water resources. The Jordan Valley (30% of the West Bank), the most fertile land in the West Bank with massive underground water reserves is now almost entirely annexed by Israel. Unfortunately, Western governments remain mute while the new Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, has openly declared that he wants to annex the Jordan Valley and make it part of Israel. The Palestinians are resisting the violent occupation and the theft of their land. The Arab rulers should be shamed for their passivity to Zionism expansion and crimes against the Palestinian people. In a recent visit to the Palestinian Occupied Territories, Chris Davies, a North West representative who is leader of the British Liberal Democrats in the European Parliament, said that he had been shocked by what he had seen in Palestine. He told the Oldham Evening Chronicle (18 April 2006) that the; “Hopes of creating a viable, independent Palestinian state are being destroyed on the ground by Israeli bulldozers, barbed wire and concrete walls”. He continues; “Palestinian land is being carved up and communities isolated. The people compare themselves to hamsters kept in cages connected by tubes that are opened and shut at the whim of their Israeli masters. Economic progress is impossible. Towns are being physically divided and people denied the right to travel between them. Israel continues to steal land to expand illegal settlements served by roads that Palestinians are forbidden to use”. Davies added; “We should be honest. These are the racist policies of apartheid yet Israel continues to pose as a victim …. I visited Auschwitz last year, and it is very difficult to understand why those whose history is one of such terrible oppression appear not to care that they have themselves become oppressors” by pursuing an analogous holocaust, the Palestinian Holocaust. It is nearly forty years of illegal occupation and colonisation of the Palestinian people. The entire Palestinian population are imprisoned and at mercy of Israel’s daily terror. Although many people are happy to equate Israel with Judaism, it is now widely acknowledged that Israel is committing gross crimes against the Palestinians and Jews around the world are unhappy to associate Judaism with Israel’s crimes. They feel associating Judaism or Jews with the crimes of Israel is bad for Jews. However, one has to ask who are the Israelis? Aren’t Israelis Jews? Isn’t Israel strife to be a “Jewish-only state”? All Israeli leaders have publicly stated that what Israel is doing to the Palestinians, is doing it for all Jews. The propaganda is design to obfuscate and blame the crimes on some phantom. Israel is considered by most Jews as the new “home” for Jews. The majority of Israeli Jews and Jews around the world are in favour of the expulsion (ethnic cleansing) of all Palestinians from their homeland. It is true that there are few progressive Jews who support the Palestinians, but those are marginalised and depicted as “self-hating Jews”. Criticising Israel’s brutal policies in Palestine and its crimes against the Palestinian people can lead to serious consequences. Journalists, academics and ‘liberal’ politicians are afraid and do all possible to avoid showing sympathy toward the Palestinian people. Defending Palestinian rights is like criticising Israel. Anyone who dares defending Palestinian rights is accused of “anti-Semitism”. It is a political suicide. The recent elections in Palestine are an opportunity for peace and recognition. Instead, Western governments not only condemn and reject the democratically elected Hamas Government they have also imposed inhumane and deadly “collective punishments” on the entire Palestinian civilian population. In addition to the Israeli blockades, Western governments have cut aid to the Palestinians. The Dutch foreign minister Ben Bot cowardly announced that: “The Palestinian people have opted for this government, so they will have to bear the consequences”. The EU demands that the Palestinian victims bear responsibility for the crimes committed against them by the Israeli forces. The democracy that the West continues to use as political tool turned out to be the precursor for mass starvation. It should be noted that the same Western governments have ignored the inclusion of the Shas Party in the newly formed Israeli Government. The Shas Party ideology is built on Fascism ideology. It openly advocates extreme violence against the Palestinians, and its main “policy” is the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians from their land. It is clear that, the aim of the US and the EU is to encourage more violence and more misery. According to Sara Roy, a scholar on Middle East at Harvard University, the restrictions imposed on the population of Gaza by Israeli forces “resulted in unprecedented levels of unemployment of 35 to 40 per cent. Some 65 to 75 per cent of Gazans are impoverished (compared to 30 per cent in 2000); many are hungry”. This was before Western governments imposed their deadly “collective punishment” on the Palestinian people as a result of exercising their democratic right. The World Bank said that the humanitarian crisis among Palestinians is worsening. The Bank gave a conservative estimate in March that poverty and unemployment levels among the Palestinian population would rise to 67 percent and 40 per cent respectively. Palestinian personal incomes would drop by 30 per cent, according to the Bank. The consequence of putting pressure on Hamas and denying the Palestinian people their democratic right is predictable. In 1992 the Algerian military cancelled the democratic elections that the Front Islamique de Salut (FIS) seemed likely to win. As a result, Algeria’s society was torn apart by a violent war in which 200,000 people died, and more than 8,000 disappeared. [3] Western governments were happy to call the decade-long violence “civil war”, and wash their hands from the crimes they encouraged in order to kill democracy. Although Algeria was not occupied by a foreign army, the current situation in Palestine has many similarities with the situation in Algeria in the cancellation of democratic elections. It is clear that Western governments have very little concern for human rights and democracy. In a recent interview, Palestinian leader Khalid Mashal clarifies Hamas demands for peace with Israel and pledged that Hams will recognise Israel if Israel withdraw its forces from the Occupied Territories, release all (about 10,000) Palestinian prisoners, and recognise the rights of all Palestinians to return to their land. Earlier, the newly elected Palestinian Prime Minister, Ismail Haniya, said: “If Israel withdraws to the 1967 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages. We will establish a situation of stability and calm, which will bring safety for our people. We do not have any feelings of animosity towards Jews. We do not wish to throw them into the sea. All we seek is to be given our land back, not to harm anybody”. The Palestinian made the offer to recognise Israel, despite that Israel’s borders are not set – Israel is a newly created expansionist state – and Israel continues the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. As usual, Israel has dismissed Hamas offer as a non-starter because Israel is not interested in peace and security, but in violence, conquest of Palestinian land and Zionist expansion. Israel has a history of rejecting of all peaceful solutions proposed by the Arabs and the Palestinians. In contrast, Israel offered no peace. The so-called “Camp David generous offer” was a fraud and designed to distort reality and discredit the Palestinians. It was an orchestrated propaganda campaign by Israel and supported by Israel Zionist backers. It is not surprising that Barak's foreign minister, Shlomo Ben-Ami, who was a key participant at Camp David, later admitted: “If I were a Palestinian I would have rejected Camp David as well”. Camp David was a trap for the late Yasser Arafat to surrender Palestinian rights. Finally, many years ago, the Jewish sociologist and historian, Maxime Rodinson wrote: “It is 1967. Israel should start looking for an agreement with the Arabs from whom they took their land. Not with some fantasy Arab people made just the way it would like them: miraculously converted to Israeli ideas by the world’s pro-Zionist lobbying, or by moral lecturing or readings in the Old Testament and the classics of Marxism and Leninism, but with Arabs as they are: unwilling to accept the uncompensated seizure of their lands. We may denounce the Arab attitude, but that is just a waste of time”. In 1992 the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) recognised the State of Israel at the time of the signing of the so-called “Oslo Peace Accord”. By contrast, the Israelis only recognised a Palestinian people to be represented by the PLO, which was not the same as recognising Palestinian statehood. Recognising Israel as an ethnic entity illegally occupying Palestinian land is a Palestinian national suicide. Hamas should follow the principle of mutual recognition. Hamas should not recognise Israel unless Israel recognises the rights of Palestinian national independence, including the ‘Rights of Return’. Hamas must insist on the end to Israel’s Occupation of Palestinian land and Israeli violence against the Palestinian people. If Israelis and Jews (collectively) want to live in peace and safety, they have to choose between two options: either continue the illegal occupation of Palestinian land, injustice and violence against the Palestinian people, or renounce violence and pursue the path to peaceful coexistence. Written by Ghali Hassan for Axis of Logic (Thanks to Keld Bach for the seed on newswine) Endnotes: [1] Gideon Levy, “Killing Children is no longer a big deal”, Ha’aretz, 17 October 2004. [2] Alison Weir, Deadly Distortion, 31 December 2004 [3] Wendy Kristianasen, “Algeria: the women speak”, Le Monde Diplomatique, April 2006. Readers have left 8 comments.
Ant Petterson:
Quote
Do people really believe such looney propoganda as this?
(1)
2006-05-22 23:10:45
S. Benari:
Quote
This article for all its passion omits the uncomfortable fact that since 1948 there has been no significant investment by Palestinians in the economy of the territories. (Compare the Palestinian elite with the Zionists!) Consequently the Palestinians became wholly dependent upon access to Israelis labour markets, and the inward movement of those earnings into the Territories for the benefit of all. Also Israelis used to cross over and go shopping and sight-seeing, together with Western primarily Christian tourists.
This influx has money has dried up due solely to the violence. The dream of open stable borders came to a crashing end with the Al-Aqsa Intifadeh. Over 150,000 Palestinians lost their jobs in Israel due to this, and were replaced by migrants from around the world. The only people to benefit from this development has been the Palestinian fighters who draw pay for their questionable efforts. Even if these fighters manage to drive the Israelis out of all the territory they captured in 67, they cannot force the Israelis to opne the borders to trade or Palestinian workers. (The EU has made this very clear in ublic statements about the fence / wall) A new strategy is needed NOW if the Palestinians are not to descend into permanent poverty. For over 60 years the strategy of killing Jews to make them compliant has failed completely. The Jews have no obligation on earth to feed or clothe the Palestinians, it is the duty of Palestinian leadership to do that and it has failed time and time again.
(2)
2006-05-23 08:01:43
Antony:
Quote
Anyone with any form of the ability to think believes israel will renounce genocide or ethnic cleansing, as proven by the previous statement.
(3)
2006-05-23 10:09:17
SS:
Quote
As it stands, Mr Hassan has provided his sources and argued his point, it would serve you well Petterson, if you actually refute the comments rather than leave one liners as comments.
(4)
2006-05-23 11:10:42
Chuck Smith:
Quote
First they ask that the Palestnians have the right to return then they ask to not defend themselves, be it violently. Next they will ask that Israel and the west surrender to Islam. Well it's no going to happen. Biblical Christianity will always support Israel and be an alternative and shield against Islam.
(5)
2006-05-24 01:30:27
SS:
Quote
Dear Chuck, your dogmatic approach to this issue at the expense of reason is somewhat bemusing. You casually mention the author asking for the "Palestinian right to return" as if it is an unreasonable request. Had you been kicked out your home, would you not want the right to return home? The rest of your sentence makes no sense at all.
Then you betray your bigotted attitude towards the whole discussion and Islam and Muslims in particular, by assuming we are going to ask Israel and the West to embrace Islam. Moreover it shows an inferiority complex in facing what Islam is, what the Qur'an is and who Muslims are. The Bible that seems to be blinding your sense of justice and equity has been shown to be an inauthentic document which has no reliable chain of narration linking its contents to its original authors. RSV 1971 (Collin's pub.) admits that the vast majority of the books have been manipulated by later authors. Whereas, the NIV, in the footnotes informs us of many passages which were not in the "older manuscripts" - over 70% of the New Testament is affected by such discrepencies. With Genesis telling us of days and nights before the existence of the Sun and Noah taking all the animals from different climates, predators and prey and all, all in one ark - is nothing beyond mythology, an interesting book maybe, but not God's Word.
(6)
2006-05-24 16:46:50
Clare:
Quote
As a REAL Christian, biblical Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with “israel”. So vomit smith (nobody believes this is his real name) because Christianity is over 2000 years old & Jesus people are the Palestinians not some unknowns from E Europe or Russia.
(7)
2006-05-25 10:07:19
Saddened reader:
Quote
This article should be sent to the British media. If there are children being killed in cold blood with government approval as this article suggests, people have to know about it.
Also, I read in a book once that Jesus was a Palestinian Jew. Is this true? If so, one wonders what he would have felt about the conflicts in the Middle East today, especially, given his views on kindness to the most helpless members of society ( as mentioned in the Christian Bible), i.e. children.
(8)
2006-05-25 22:30:35
|

















