Login to post comments | No account yet? Register here
| The Media Jihad on Terrorism |
|
|
| Tuesday, 09 May 2006 | |
|
I am getting rather tired of having to keep denouncing the terrorist attacks happening all over the world when perpetrated by Muslims; and the latest Egypt saga is no different. The fact of the matter is that it is true that ‘reasons for motivation’ are simply not excuses. I do not disagree that we must discuss how one may prevent such further attacks by removing injustices along with fighting the symptomatic manifestations…but sometimes we must call a spade a spade! To clarify the matter from an Islamic point of view, here is short discussion on the legal issues surrounding the attacking of non-Muslim citizens/visitors of the state. Though it talks specifically about previous bombings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, it contains information that applies to the recent case as well. This is a message to all the Muslims out there: we know that the media are doing their utmost to paint us with a certain light. We know, moreover, how it is ridiculous to tally such actions with Islam. Our leaders stand up and denounce these acts, and insist they are not part of Islam…but do the public believe this when all they see is death and destruction on the box in front of their eyes? The population of the Muslim world is around the 1.5 billion mark; and a very minute proportion of that is involved in terrorism in its various forms. The power of the media, however, is that such numbers can seem to be grossly amplified due to the various dramatic and fantastical ways it can publicise information. Public perception is vitally important, and it is my opinion that the British public are among the most tolerant in the Western world. After the London bombings, any backlash against the Muslim community was very insignificant, especially when compared to places like America following 9/11, and generally other European countries such as France in the wake of the hijab ban in state schools. Having studied and worked in the public sector in the capital, I have seen Muslims – including visibly recognisable Muslims donning beards and hijabs – interacting professionally, courteously and compassionately towards their non-Muslim colleagues. I therefore understand that many Londoners do have a better perception of certain Muslims who collectively make up over 10% of the population. However, the character of some Muslims in the capital still leaves little to be desired, and non-Muslims with little contact with our communities (and there are still many) have nothing to go by except their perception through the terrorist acts shown on the media. Therefore, we have only ourselves to blame if ever something were to occur to create an imbalance to the other side of the scales. How do we then change public perception? First, we must consider ourselves and our families and communities ambassadors for Islam here in the UK. If we are not behaving immaculately in public then we need to check everything about us, question whether we really are praying with conviction, fasting by spirit and talking with sincerity, or whether it is all just a habit and show. Secondly, and perhaps even more crucially when referring to perception outside Muslim-populated areas, we need to be aware of how to utilise the mainstream media in this country. On a basic level, we should write in to newspapers and phone in to live discussions on television or radio when Muslims are being discussed. On a more effective level we need to join an organisation that actively partakes in lobbying the media through effective meetings and interviews on and off air, with influential editors and journalists. For more information on how you can get involved, please see this article. It is related in the hadith collection of Imam Muslim that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) told us, "Whoever sees something evil should change it with his hand. If he cannot, then with his tongue; and if he cannot do even that, then in his heart. That is the weakest degree of faith." It is absolutely clear from the above that we must do what we can to change the evil; and do not kid yourselves – the distorted perception of this religion of ours is among the greatest evils, when it is this very religion that established justice among oppressed people and gave rights to those who were denied. Our duty is to convey the message of Allah through the teaching we have been given, and through the power of the media, show the terrorist attacks to be what they really are: a small part of a large and rich society with a heritage from which emanates not death and destruction, but justice and compassionate. Readers have left 12 comments.
SirB:
Quote
When will people realise that Muslims were not responsible for ANY bombings.
These are all CIA-Mossad operations to suit their agendas. "When Zionazis get into power things go boom and a police state follows" SirB.
(1)
2006-05-09 21:50:13
SS:
Quote
The Qur'an time and time again reminds us that Allah is the controller of our affairs and that any harm that comes to us is by our own hands. The nature of the article is thus in parallel to the Islamic teachings, where we resolve our failings and put our trust in Allah only then can we deal with the external enemy.
The vast majority of the 'ulema from different schools including the salafi/Wahhabi school have since the early 90's condemned suicide missions, plane hijacking, and the targetting of civilians. However, Muslim masses polarised by idiots have been denouncing these scholars as "sell-outs", "government scholars," and "scholars for dollars". When terrorist release videos citing religious justifications for bombing Muslims as well as non-Muslims - they pretty much do what the Danish cartoonist did. What I am saying is, yes we can blame the media, for its very nature of sensationalism, but ultimately what the media states is being said by Muslims - just look at the discussion involving the Ajmal Masroor article over the last week.
(2)
2006-05-10 13:47:04
S. Benari:
Quote
A fine article and one that should be read by all contributors to this site. Too frequently opinions are expressed that show very clearly how much certain people claiming to represent Islam have absorbed the racist / sectarian conspiracy materials used by the neo-nazi groups like BNP etc. The alliance between reactionary Arab nationalism and fascism in the 1930's thoroughly infected certain significant factions. If we allow these people to represent Islam and propogate their perverted views, then it is understandable if the media takes this to represent Islam.
There is a desperate need for rational debate about the circumstances that have caused this violence. Simply blaming Zionism is a lazy self-deceptive opt-out. Authorties like Bernard Lewis highlight the crisis of identity and values that is present in modern Islamic societies. This must be honestly addressed and reform instituted.
(3)
2006-05-10 14:03:31
Mike:
Quote
'these are all CIA-Mossad operations to suit their agenda'
Er..gee Sir B, well done. According to muslims isn't everything a CIA-Mossad plot? In fact only yesterday I suspected that those devious yankee zionists were attempting mind control on me. Luckily I have one of these devices to counter this insidious threat: http://zapatopi.net/afdb/#WHAT This incredible device could be the answer to your prayers! You can even put your skull cap over it & those nasty yankee zionists would never know!
(4)
2006-05-10 23:46:51
Bilal Patel:
Quote
As Muslims, do we need to give a reaction or be defensive about what happens in Egypt? When suicide bombs go off in Sri Lanka, are there press releases issuing from Hindus and Buddhists here in the UK? Do British Jews consistently apologise for the zionist state? No, they don't. So any Muslim who gets defensive and apologises is playing straight into an agenda which is based on the premise that Muslims aren't British and therefore ought to be treated differently from anyone else. Our reaction ought to be strong and consistent. If there are attacks on Israelis in Egypt, then why is this surprising? If people want to stop terrorism, then stop interfering in places where they are not wanted. If they wage war on others - others will wage war on them. That's what the London bombings were all about. It's as simple as that. No further explanation is necessary.
(5)
2006-05-11 01:58:05
no lies:
Quote
The parallel between Zionism & the nazis / fascists is a superficial way to look at things. Considering the ideologies came after zionism & as any person can the repeat of history of the persecution of the Semitic race by the israelis such as the benari (one of the N Africans who ran away to israel) comes out with such obvious lies, no wonder it posts her to justify genocide. zionism is an outright dilution of nazis / fascists as these hatred had limits.
(6)
2006-05-11 09:58:39
S. Benari:
Quote
Bilal,
while there is no need to be defensive, there is a need to make clear that bombing tourists in the Sinai is not an "Islamic" act, despite the claims of the bombers. This is important as there are many claiming to speak on behalf of all Muslims who claim that killing non-Muslims and even some Muslims is justifiable according to their interpretation of the Koran. Sadly today we are reminded how close this is to us with the findings of the inquiry into the London bombings. The Muslims statement should be "we share the sorrow of the victims and condemn the perpetrators without reservation!"
(7)
2006-05-11 19:30:06
Bilal Patel:
Quote
A life is the same irrespective of who it belongs to. So Muslims should condemn if - and only if - every Jew comes out and condemns 'Israel', every Hindu and Buddhist comes out and condemns what is happening in Sri Lanka and every American and European comes out and condemns western foreign policy. Otherwise, it is dangerous for Muslims to condemn actions by other Muslims, since it feeds the false perception that these actions are unjustifiable whilst other actions are not. In which case, the best thing for Muslims to do is to warn the West that as long as the West is intent on waging a war on others, then others will wage a war on the West. And many Muslims believe that the West is waging a war on Islam. This is far more productive than a meaningless and dangerous condemnation. Condemnations and meaningless diatribes about Islam being a religion of peace solve nothing. Islam is a religion of justice, and there is no peace without justice.
(8)
2006-05-11 20:28:02
Bilal Patel:
Quote
And anyway, why should we, as British Muslims, make a hue and cry if a bunch of Israelis (the targets of the Egyptian bombs) get blasted to bits in the Sinai, when the zionists blast our brothers and sisters and keep them prisoners in their own land? The answer is clear - wage war on others, and they will wage war on you. That's the clear and simple message that every single Muslim should repeat again and again and again.
(9)
2006-05-11 20:36:36
S. Benari:
Quote
Bilal,
If Islam and Muslims are superior to others, then it is Muslims that must lead the way. Otherwise it simply proves that Islam is as rotten as every other belief system.
(10)
2006-05-12 08:53:23
Bilal Patel:
Quote
Of course Islam is superior, which is why Muslims are also clever enough not to fall into zionist traps or fall for the advice of ill-disguised zionists on Muslim websites. The more Muslims behave like craven apologists, the more the media shuns it's attention away from the real issues, like the right for Muslim nations to be armed, or the right of Hamas to be recognised as a true partner, or the right of Palestine to exist. There is a law of Allah which decrees that for every action, there will be a reaction. Muslims should shout this out repeatedly. If you declare war on others, then others will declare war on you. Simple.
(11)
2006-05-12 13:14:02
S. Benari:
Quote
Bilal,
In my opnion Hamas is about as UN-ISLAMIC as anyone could get. This is an organisation that has combined the Koran, the gift from Allah (PBUH)to mankind, and the Protocols fo the Elders of Zion, a proven forgery produced by the Tsarist Secret Police at the end of the 19th Century in oder to forment communal hatred between Christians and Jews. (It is this hatred as much as anything that spurred the development of modern Zionism in the first place).Hamas has bound the Koran and the Elder of Zions up so much that they cannot separate them and select elements of each to justify their hatreds. They have allowed this Russian forgery to corrupt their understanding of the Koran and their beliefs in Islam. As you say if someone declares war on another then they should not be surprised if they become the object of warlike actions. Hamas makes it absolutely clear that it sees itself at war with Jews around the world and proposes genocide. That's what the Palestinians voted for - for existential war. Draw your iown conclusions
(12)
2006-05-15 08:45:07
|














