Message To Muslims: Stop Apologising! Print E-mail
Monday, 26 February 2007

537800_bullseye"The point here is not to make excuses or justify the killing of innocents by Muslims. But it must also be recognized and understood that Muslim violence is not inherently more evil than the violence perpetrated by their accusers – and the loss of Muslim life as a result of western imperialist and colonialist aggression is not more benign than the killing of innocents as a result of so-called religious imperatives. The time is long overdue to stop speaking from a position of apologetic weakness and to start exercising the moral imperative you face to stand up for yourselves."

Stop apologizing for al-Qaeda. You didn’t create them, the CIA did. Stop apologizing for every act of violence perpetrated by Muslims unless you demand that every Christian and Jew apologize for the murderous acts of their co-religionists, too. Enough already! Stand tall, walk proudly and love yourselves because Islam is a great religion and Islamic history is a very rich and impressive one.

Since September 11, 2001, Muslims around the world have had unrelenting pressure brought to bear on them to apologize or explain or condemn every act of violence committed by those who call themselves Muslims. And that is exactly what Islamic leaders have been so pathetically doing – incessantly and fruitlessly trying to explain to an indoctrinated audience that not all Muslims are evil or violent.

Yes, it was truly a grotesque act of mass murder committed on September 11, which led to the killing of 3,000 innocent men, women and children, but their lives and their innocence is not greater than the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi lives lost as a result of Western and Zionist aggression. How many 9/11s have been unleashed against the Iraqi people in the last 4 years alone, to say nothing of the hundreds of thousands killed as a direct result of American-led economic sanctions during the 8 years prior to the invasion?

Why is it more evil to plan an attack like 9/11 than it is to conspire to wage a war of aggression against a defenseless nation and reduce it to rubble? It’s not, so stop apologizing!

When someone asks you to condemn Islamic violence, demand that they condemn Christian and Jewish violence and apologize for the disproportionate amount of death and destruction they have visited upon the world – for if you totaled every death caused by all the so-called Islamic fundamentalist organizations combined, they would barely equate to a fraction of the murders committed by Christians and Jews in the last 100 years alone.

When you are reminded of how Muslim financial support for terrorist organizations has led to thousands of deaths around the world, don’t forget to remind them of how Zionist Jewish bankers in New York, Germany and England funneled tens of millions of dollars to the Bolsheviks, who killed an estimated 20 million Russian Orthodox Christians between 1917 and 1945. You may also want to remind them that 5 billion US dollars a year has been funding Israel’s 40 year occupation of the West Bank and Jerusalem, its construction of segregated Jewish supremacist settlements, and its continued violation of dozens of UN resolutions, to say nothing of its history of monstrous violence against innocent Arab civilians.

The Israelis who get blown up on buses are not more important than the Palestinians killed by American-supplied Israeli tanks, planes, bombs and missiles. Cry for and condemn the American and British lives recently lost to terrorist acts, but don’t forget to remind the world to condemn the wholesale killing of hundreds of Lebanese civilians during last summer’s savage Israeli bombing campaign using cluster bombs and other munitions that were supplied by the US and sent to Israel via Britain. Not only did President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair not condemn Israel for what were obviously monstrous violations of international humanitarian law, but they in fact blocked any attempt by the UN to stop it and supplied the weapons to help it along.

It is indeed quite impressive that western leaders don’t “teach’ their young men and women to strap bombs to themselves, like militant Muslim leaders do. But then again, why should they when they have their armies to do that? I mean, why use a pathetic little homemade bomb when you can drop a 5,000 lb Daisy Cutter? Why be satisfied with bringing down two buildings when you can reduce entire neighborhoods to rubble, as has been done to Bint Jbail, Beirut, Jenin, Gaza, Fallujah and Kabul?

To somehow mitigate the criminality of the terror conducting on behalf of the western ruling elite, it is oftentimes pointed out by their apologists that Muslims themselves have in the past, and present, killed each other – oftentimes mercilessly and cruelly, as they are now doing in Iraq. Well, it is also true that Christians have done the same to each other. Remember the 200,000 Germans incinerated in Dresden in 72 hours? Or how about the obliteration of 180,000 Japanese civilians in Hiroshima, Japan’s only Christian city at the time? What about the massive Christian-on-Christian violence in the Balkans, including 78 days of ‘round-the-clock American bombing? The list goes on. Do those realities somehow negate the criminality of Muslim terrorism against Christians?

The point here is not to make excuses or justify the killing of innocents by Muslims. But it must also be recognized and understood that Muslim violence is not inherently more evil than the violence perpetrated by their accusers – and the loss of Muslim life as a result of western imperialist and colonialist aggression is not more benign than the killing of innocents as a result of so-called religious imperatives. The time is long overdue to stop speaking from a position of apologetic weakness and to start exercising the moral imperative you face to stand up for yourselves.

Source: Media Monitors Network




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Live!Facebook!Technorati!Spurl!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Readers have left 33 comments.
RSD: Quote

The banner of this article is inspiring, Muslims do not and should apologise for being Muslims or the actions of madmen claiming to be Muslims. If there is anything to apologise for it is the failure to stand up and challenge activity, like that of the extremists, which goes against the tenets of Islam.

However sadly this article then declines into dishonest propoganda. Zionist Jewish bankers did not bankroll the Bolshevik murder of millions as is suggested Stalin targetted Jews for special treatment and relgious Jews were victimised by the Communists. The USA has not given Israel $5bn each year for the last 40 years. The fact is that the US did not significantly start to assist Israel until after the 1973 war.
By including this silliness into this argument makes it look like Muslims are actualy embarrassed by their co-religionists and are desperate for non-Muslims to be diverted towards the misdeeds of the Zionists.

If Muslims and Islam wish to be respected then they and it have to stand up and take responsibility for their own actions, or lack of them. To do anything else indicates a worrying degree of communal immaturity. This article makes Muslims look like pathetic children trying to escape criticism by pointing out the faults of others.
(1) 2007-02-26 08:42:25
Yunus Yakoub Islam: Quote

I am looking forward to reading Samir Kassir's 'being Arab' (introduction by Robert Fisk) knowing Arab and Muslim are far from being synonymous although significantly connected, sensing that this book may have much to say about Muslim self-confidence. By the way, I think MPACUK should encourage submission of regular book reviews: 800 words, journalistic, personal, positive, fiction and factual works. What do you think?
(2) 2007-02-26 08:57:19
Africana: Quote

Finally someone with sense! I have never apologised because I have NOTHING TO APOLOGISE FOR!

Why should I take the blame for fascists, racists, bigots insane vile brutal atrocious western barbarity.
if the past rodent & vermin called abomination colonialism wasn't atrocious enough we have the shitty psychotic "New Europe" We will do anything to be accepted in the US mercenary outfit called US-ato now.

their gluttony barbarity and evilness is the cancer called neo-cohenism.

The slaughter of Muslim goes on because the Arab despots and gulf goons want to play the repulsive satanic puppets.
(3) 2007-02-26 11:20:19
funky doopster: Quote

well said. When muslims are murdered, it is considered as collateral damage, but when westerners(non-muslims) die as a result of self defence, it is considered to be an evil and murderous act, ie. terrorism, insurgency, etc. Just one clear example of disgusting WESTERN HYPOCRISY. Could list many more, but would spend forever writing about it.
(4) 2007-02-26 12:43:51
RSD: Quote

Corrections: The highest German estimate for deaths in Dresden in WW2 is 100,000 not 200,000. However somewhere around only 35,000 can be verified. Hiroshima was not a "Christian" city, but it was a centre for Christianity in Japan. About 60,000 people died as a result of the A Bomb, not 180,000.
As for the Balkans conflict Croats, Serbs, Albanians, Bosniaks and others were all active participants, and they all drew in foreign volunteers / mercenaries to help them. It was never a simple matter of Christian on Christian or Christian against Muslim violence. What there certainly was during this conflict was an attempt to take revenge for attrocities carried out in WW2.
The use of exagerrated figures and misleading claims to embellish an argument is thoroughly unhelpful and leads inevitably to misunderstanding.
(5) 2007-02-26 13:08:24
Mary: Quote

As a non-Muslim can I say 'here here' to this. Don't apologise as you have nothing to apologise for - we all however have a duty to organise and join with others to fight injustice!!
(6) 2007-02-26 13:29:20
TallDave: Quote

I think I will have more sympathy for this point of view when muslims organise a mass march in London in support of freedom of speech, when muslims march in their thousands demonstrating against muslims killing other muslims in Iraq, when muslims march against muslim extremism. After all you're happy to march demanding death to Salman Rushdie and in support of burning books, and happy to march against the danish cartoons and for censorship, BUT NEVER AGAINST MUSLIM VIOLENCE OR THE THREAT OF MUSLIM VIOLENCE OR FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECHM, EVEN IF IT OFFENDS YOU!

- it's alright boys, I know you won't let this message past onto your boards!
(7) 2007-02-26 15:23:22
arial sharon ( no relation): Quote

Old judeo- christian saying:

let s/he who is without sin;

cast the first stone !
(8) 2007-02-26 15:48:18
Guard the Guards: Quote

1985: Osama Bin Ladin based in Khost and Jalalabad in Afghanistan, CIA supply arms including training in the use of 'Stinger Missiles' at a US Military base in El Paso, Texas;

1985: Mujahideen supplied with over 500 Stinger Missiles to use against Russian Aircraft;

1990: Mullah Omar based in Quetta, Pakistan, CIA keen to seek a leader among the Afghan exile community to oppose Russian puppet government in Kabul, Mullah Omar identified as a potential candidate;

1991: CIA fund Mullah Omar and other 'Kandaharis' to set-up a government in exile, Taliban is born;

1991: CIA attempt to get back 'Stinger Missiles' from Mujahideen forces, without success, new buy-back program is established, prices start from US$ 100, but no takers. Prices rise upto US$ 100,000, still no takers. Over 300 Stinger Missiles still not accounted for, presumed to be in the hands of the Muj Forces;

1992: Fear is growing in Washington that Stinger Threat to Civilian and Military Aircraft if not recovered;

1993: CIA covertly start campaign to soil the good work done by the Arab Muj Force in Afghanistan during the Russian occupation years. CIA start using the term 'Al Qaida,' Western Media picks-up on this and thus, Al Qaida is born;

1994: Most bombing activities around the world blamed on the so called Al Qaida movement by the CIA;

1997/8: CIA Covert Operations or Black Ops start planning for the invasion of Iraq in early 1998, but Stinger Missiles recovery program bears no fruit, plans are shelved, UN Secretary General is sent into Baghdad to fool Saddam, Iraq Government is fooled into thinking that US/UK has no plans to attack;

1998: CIA getting desperate to recover Stinger Missiles from Afghanistan, Black Ops hatch plans to provide excuse to attack Afghanistan by allowing bombing of US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, Clinton does not authorise a full-scale attack so no Stinger Missiles recovered;

2001: 9/11 plan hatched by Black Ops is put into action, it works, this provides the excuse for an invasion of Afghanistan, Stinger Missiles are recovered successfully, now Iraq can be invaded without fear of coalition aircraft being downed by Stinger Missiles threat;

2001: Afghanistan is attacked, NATO role is illegal since the State of Afghanistan has not declared nor attacked any NATO member state, who cares;

2003: Saddam toppled in a dramatic fashion, all is well for the US/UK alliance, victory for the West once again, they are only killing Arabs, who cares;

WHO GUARDS THE GUARDS
(9) 2007-02-26 16:02:41
Paul Boulter: Quote

As a non-Muslim, I would like to express deep worry at the tone of this article. Would someone please explain what the murderous acts committed by Christians and Jews in the name of those religions are? There is a distinction between actions carried out by a Christian, and actions carried out in the name of Christianity. The Iraq war was not carried out in the name of Christianity. 9/11 was explicitly carried out in the name of Islam. Suicide bombings are perpetrated every day in the world in the name of Islam - innocent people are deliberately targeted. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists etc do NOT do this. The only reason people think terror attacks are carried out in the name of Islam is that the people who carry them out say themselves that they are carrying them out in the name of Islam. For a start, I think you may wish to talk to the people who are preaching that it is a religious duty incumbent upon Muslims to wage war against all non-Muslims.
(10) 2007-02-26 17:14:33
Rob: Quote

I have on many occasions given a similar response when people have stated we do not see moderate muslims apologising for the actions of terrorists.

so i respond to them we shall not go into history but talk about here and now, when every christian in america and britain goes and apologises in person to every afghan and iraqi for the deaths of hundreds of thosuands of iraqis and afghanis,then and only then you can ask others to apologise.

the hundreds of millions of dead in africa-americas-asia and europe bear witness to the cruelty of men who claim to be followers of jesus peace be upon them.

but i personally believe in if you do the crime you do the time,not your brothers-father or your countrymen.
(11) 2007-02-26 17:15:58
Rick B: Quote

What's worse is that Bush & Blair gain political capital whenever terrorists attack America and Britain. So it's a win-win situation for them to encourage more violence as it feeds into their plans for a "generational war" and increased police state powers.

In fact there is more going on than meets the eye. Watch "9/11: Press for Truth" on google-video (about the "Jersey Girls" and read David Ray Griffin's "New Pearl Harbor".
(12) 2007-02-26 17:43:17
Shazy: Quote

This text is from the same highly informed source. How stupid we Muslims are, can we not see that our lives and the way we think and pray is governed by the Zionazi masters?

Madrassa - Israel's Weapon of Muslim-Slavery
by Mesbah Uddin
(Monday, December 22, 2003)

"The madrassas, geared to the Jihadi ideals of violence and intolerance, have been uncovered by the Israelis as a self-destructive tool for Islam. Obviously, it would be more conducive to Israeli interests than any other country to portray Islam with a maximum ill-repute to the whole world. The sources of these funds then could logically be funnelled by Israel and laundered through the Arabs - couldn't it? Is it really a Muslim-drill for divinity or an Israeli drug plotted for Islam vilification that is the question. To a mind, free from Zionist propaganda through the US media, the Israeli hands are soaked with the Madrassa financing - inevitable and unavoidable.

The Zionist controlled media, with gleaming eureka, identified numerous Madrassas marred with fanaticism and their sources of funds linking to the Saudis. But why would the Saudis waste money to Islamize people where Islam predominately floods those countries? More to the point, why the Saudis, believing in Wahhabi doctrine, would finance non-Wahhabi rivals? After all, no new love has popped up for the Wahhabis to fortify the Berelvi and Deobandi Sunnism that covers Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Kashmir and to some extent - Malaysia. One must not forget that the Wahhabis reject most of the Hadith while the other Sunnis thrive on it."

And as the Jewish Zionist Conspiracy controls the Madrassahs, logically it is responsible for 9/11, 7/7 and all the other Islamic terrorist incidents
(13) 2007-02-26 19:30:01
JAB: Quote

My goodness, Shazy, you really do sound like a complete conspiracy nut.
So, the Saudis couldn't possibly fund madrassas, but the Israelis could? Just to make Muslims look bad?! Utterly ludicrous.
Maybe the Jews used to break their own shop windows - just to make the Nazis look bad? Perhaps they've even sold the Iranians nuclear technology to lure them into nuking Tel Aviv, thereby winning for Israel even more of the world's sympathy?! You just never know with these pesky Judeo-Christian Crusader Zionazi puppet-master types do you??!!!
Give me a break.
The vast majority of conspiracy theories - yours included - are cynical drivel of the worst kind. If you hear the sound of thundering hooves, don't think "zebra". In other words, the simplest explanation is usually the truth. Muslims investing in religious education for Muslims? That I can buy. Israel funding madrassas to make the Ummah look shady? Forget it.
(14) 2007-02-27 11:18:06
Rob: Quote

paul boulter if you think what is happening in iraq has nothing to do with christianity then may be you should check news files to show the american soldeirs writing on bombs if Allah does not listen try Jesus.

maybe you should also check what the butcher of iraq President Bush is reported to have said when asked about invading iraq, he replied god told me to liberate the people of iraq and afghanistan.

maybe you have missed the lebanon war were jewish rabbis were blessing bombs and shells being fired into lebanon and jewish kids were writing meesages of ill will for the lebanese.

as for history check the reasons used by evil imperialists for exterminating hundreds of millions in the americas and africa,they stated we are bringing gods word to these pagans and heathens.

you should check the reality of american lies in regard to september 11,they blame alciada for september 11 yet the F.B.I says it has no evidence against alciada for them to charge osama bin laden with carrying out septmeber 11.

it is easy to malign others but reality is a harsh reminder.
(15) 2007-02-27 12:14:12
Paul Boulter: Quote

Rob at 12:14

You'll be unsurprised to hear I disagree with everything you say - I haven't seen any evidence for any of the things you claim, but I'm sure you're in touch with much better sources of information than I am.

However, even if they are all true - would you care to say whether that justifies the deliberate slaughter of innocent people in the name of Islam, as takes place every day around the world? I may be totally misguided here, and I look forward to being corrected, but I don't ever recall this organisation or the MCB or other similiar organisations unequivically condemning the deliberate targeting of innocent civilians, by people of all religion and none. I'm sure someone such as yourself will be happy to correct me and do just this.
(16) 2007-02-27 13:16:55
Rob: Quote

Please tell me where in the world people are killed in the name of islam because islam tells them to kill non muslims.

wherever i look in the world muslims are being killed by jews in palestine-by hindus in india-by orthodox christians in chechnya.

if we look at iraq and afghanistan muslims are being killed by so called christians.

in mindanao they are being killed by catholic christians-in thailand they are being killed by buddhists-in arakan burma they are being killed by buddhists-in east turkestan they are being killed by communists.

no one resisting occupation and slaughter states that islam tells me to kill innocent people,they resist using whatever means necesary,if the occupiers do not like the consequences of their actions they should not occupy and slaughter others.

paul if you watched sky news you will be able to see from their coverage what i have stated about the bombs.

in regard to M.C.B and other organisations they have categorically stated that innocent civilians cannot be targetted and this is what islam tells us.

B.T.W the americans-israelis and british governments have a nice word for innocent civilain deaths its called colateral damage and nearly 700,000 dead iraqis will be pleased to know they are not innocent human beings but colateral damage.

if you want to see the evidence of the extermination of hundreds of millions in africa and americas check the real history of the world not the victors version of history.
(17) 2007-02-27 18:23:06
Mike: Quote

As a westerner I will also never apologise for imperialism, colonialism, slavery etc etc. It's history - get over it. Besides, Islam has just as much blood on it's hands...not that a muslim would ever admit it.
(18) 2007-02-27 21:33:39
Paul Boulter: Quote

Rob

Just a further thought - I came across this statement from the mouth of Mohammed Siddique Khan, one of the July 7 bombers:

"I and thousands like me are forsaking everything for what we believe. Our drive and motivation doesn't come from tangible commodities that this world has to offer. Our religion is Islam, obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final prophet messenger.

Your democratically elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world. And your support of them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters."

However, I'm sure he was just misguided, and didn't really understand what Islam is really about, as I'm sure you'll be only too happy to agree with me on.
(19) 2007-02-28 09:38:19
Rob: Quote

Mike christianity wins hands down when it comes to blood on their hands.

for every one death attributed to islam hundreds more can be attributed to christianity,it is time christians admit that they have abused christianity for their own personal greed and lust for power.

no one has the right to force their religious or secular beleifs on other nations or individuals any one who does this by violence is a terrorist period.
(20) 2007-02-28 11:18:59
Salim: Quote

Ofcourse we should not appologize for acts of few. There are 50,000 murders in the US every year; does it mean that all Americans are murderers? Ofcourse not, then again all 9/11 perpetretors died along with the others and we do not know the truth.What happened to the black box? lying in Paul Wolfowitz's office? Mossad's office? or CIA office? we never know. How is it that Corrie (An American who stood in front of a tank to protect a Palestinian's house from being bulldozed) who was killed by the Israeli's tank (she was crushed to death by an Israeli tank)and nothing was done to the person who did it or even published in the US but if an Israeli is killed it is headlines even in the US. Come on use your common sense. If Israel is your friend then you do not need an enemy. It is the only ally that has spied against the US. It seems Israel can do anything it wants and not be punished for it. Mel Gibson was right. It is time Americans get up from their slumber and see for what Israel is. Americans have more Allies in the Arab world but the Jewish controlled media will not allow the Americans to know that. By the way no religion teaches violence and if there are people who actually believe that then well what can I say?
(21) 2007-02-28 12:14:52
Athena Murphy: Quote

Mike clearly doesn't know much history if he truly believes that 'Islam has as much blood on its hands'. Islam would have a job beating the millions killed by the British empire or the millions more killed by the US empire in recent decades alone (along with their mini-me warmongers in the UK).

As for an apology from you, who's asking for it Mike? Maybe you should 'get over' your own ego and get yourself an education.

Athena (a non-Muslim who stands in solidarity with the Muslim community).
(22) 2007-02-28 13:02:02
Shazy: Quote

Dear JAB,
I think if you read my comments carefully you will see that I copied another article from the same source. Media Monitors appear to propogate a wide range of ideas few or none of which have much to do with reality. Of course the madrassahs are not funded and controlled by the Zionists, it is an absurd idea. But it gives a sense of the credibility of Media Monitors Network as a reliable source.
(23) 2007-02-28 14:00:41
Syed: Quote

To Paul Boulter:

Although Islam advocates fighting against oppression and injustice, there are laws on how this should be conducted. Killing innocent civilians is completely forbidden.

"...that if anyone killed an innocent person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed the whole of mankind. And if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole of mankind..." Quran 5:32

"But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things)." Quran 8:61
(24) 2007-03-01 09:54:05
Paul Boulter: Quote

Syed

Thank you very much for that, most interesting. However, I'd very much appreciate some clarification on the 5:32 verse. It says that killing an innocent person would be as if he killed the whole of mankind, UNLESS "it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land." what does spreading mischief mean? I'm not sure that spreading mischief, by my definition, warrants being murdered. My reading of that verse says that the killing of people in the name of Islam is very much sanctioned.

As a quick aside, do you agree with the motives of the July 7 bombers? Were their actions sanctioned under Islam? Would be very interested to hear your thoughts.
(25) 2007-03-01 12:17:22
Rob: Quote

paul boulter i said where does islam say kill non muslims just because they are non muslims.

if you are going to quote peoples personal opinions then we can quote racists-religious bigots and then claim this is what their religion says,would be totally wrong and incorrect.

i have never said jesus told so called christians to go around robbing and exterminating other humans on earth.

what jesus says and what islam says should not be confused with what christians and muslims do,these are two diffrent issues.

as the saying goes those without sin should throw the first stone,but those with bad memories should look over their shoulders at their own glass houses before throwing a stone.
(26) 2007-03-01 12:55:40
Africana: Quote

Mike you suffer from delusions of grandeur.
Who in the hell would want anything from an individual with hideous ideology as your?

Your queen is going around apologizing for the your history.
British apologies
* POTATO FAMINE
In 1997 Tony Blair said sorry for Britain not doing more to relieve suffering from Ireland's 19th-century potato famine.
* DESERTERS
This year some 300 First World War soldiers shot for refusing to fight (many of whom were shell-shocked) were pardoned.
* MAORIS
In 1995, the Queen officially apologised to the largest Maori tribe in New Zealand for the devastation wrought on their land in the 1860s.
* AMRITSAR MASSACRE
In 1997 the Queen visited Amritsar in the Punjab, scene of a massacre of up to 1.200 people in 1919. She said it was "distressing", and said: "History cannot be rewritten, however much we might sometimes wish otherwise."
From: By George Monbiot 12/27/05 "The Guardian
In his book Late Victorian Holocausts, published in 2001, Mike Davis tells the story of famines that killed between 12 and 29 million Indians. These people were, he demonstrates, murdered by British state policy
US-ato in Afghanistan

In an interview with Le Vif-L'Express magazine, Mr Flahaut argued: "The situation is deteriorating and, over time, Nato forces risk appearing like an army of occupation." Discussions of an exit strategy are the last thing the Nato top brass wants to hear because it is hoping to use this week to reinforce a message of unity on Afghanistan.

Athena Murphy:
Your solidarity means a lot more than the apology above. It is your humanity that is so wonderful.
Thanks
(27) 2007-03-01 20:42:09
Africana: Quote

paul boulter educate yourself. All the information is out there

It seems that the UK and the CIA and Mossad (I use these monikers loosely) have recruited every mercenary gun-for-hire they could find and inducted them into the Shia death squad currently being run out of the American (sorry "Iraqi") Interior Ministry in Baghdad.

I wrote this about it last year:
Concerning the sectarian killings in Iraq that the US government and media try hard to attribute to "al-Qaeda":
It has already been exposed that the killings and bombings are the work of "death squads" working out of the Iraqi interior ministry, (http://www.brusselstribunal.org/DiyalaFuller.htm) which itself is entirely controlled by the CIA. Let me reiterate that in every war waged by the US government against a foreign nation, a counter-insurgency operation has immediately been implemented. Counter-insurgency operations are required in such circumstances because when a country is invaded, an insurgency of some form invariably arises to defend the country. Such insurgents are very difficult for an invading army to defeat given the extensive support and collaboration they enjoy from the general population.
Essentially, an invading army finds itself at war with the population of the country they are invading rather than a separate and independent insurgency. Strategies developed over the years to deal with such situations has come to be known as "counter-insurgency", and include attempts to identify divisions within the society, usually religious, political or ethnic, however insignificant, and to then attempt to provoke these divisions. Of course, in the scenario where a country has been invaded by a foreign military force, such internal divisions become almost nonexistent as the population unites to oppose the invaders, as is the case in Iraq. For this reason, counter-insurgency tactics designed to sow discord must be fabricated and generally involve the creation of a fake insurgency by the military intelligence apparatus of the invading force.
This fake insurgency is made up of groups of armed militia who are paid by the invading force to target and murder distinct groups among the population, again, along religious, ethnic or political lines. In the case of Iraq, we see militia 'death squad' attacks on both Sunni and Shia members of the Iraq population which are blamed on the real insurgency or "al-qaeda in Iraq". The hoped-for benefits of such brutal tactics are to demoralise and confuse the real insurgency and the population that supports them, to embroil the real insurgency in an internecine conflict, and, in the specific case of Iraq, to promote the US government's claim that al-Qaeda is still active and poses a deadly threat to civlised societies everywhere. The above scenario is EXACTLY what we are seeing in Iraq with the fake counter-insurgency death squads being controlled, financed and run by the CIA out of the Iraqi interior ministry, or rather, the US government's interior ministry in Iraq…………………………
9/11
Mathaba News Highlights
BBC World News and the 9/11 Smoking Gun?

BBC says: We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down but we still managed to report WTC7 had collapsed 23 minutes before it happened! ...more
(28) 2007-03-01 20:57:39
CG: Quote

Stop what apologising? I have never heard a muslim apologise, ever.
(29) 2007-03-02 17:11:52
Anwa: Quote

Okay let us all be honest again LOL
Did Jesus say love your neighbour, peace etc. Or go and drink their blood?

So how do you explain the Christian crusades..... Never mind.

Tony Blair woke up one day, apparently the wrong side of bed. He then tried to justify the war in Iraq by replying to a question from a journalist GOD told him to go Iraq and drop Christian bombs on women and children.

http://www.blairwatch.co.uk/node/867
(30) 2007-03-06 10:52:23
BHAI1: Quote

my thread

WE CONSTANTLY APOLOGIZE ......WHY?

http://forum.mpacuk.org/showthread.php?t=20697

being good muslims means we should not be pathetic muslims
(31) 2007-03-06 10:57:54
Salim: Quote

It seems Paul Boulter is living on another planet. No religion teaches violence. The question doesn't even arise. It is sad that the US media portray certain religion in a negative light (To serve their purpose, most are owned by Zionist and Jews). It is funny that before September 11 there was nothing wrong with Islam and suddenly after September 11 (done by a few people whose religion is not important)the religion is looked at with suspicion. How is it that Timothy McVaiegh's religion is not coming into question? The media is playing on the ignorance of the American public. How is it that no newspapers outside North America ever print anything against any religion while the media in the US are having a field day since September 11 attacking the entire Arab and Muslim world with negative rhetorics even though the act has been done by a few people, that too not proved? Al Qayeda was funded by the US and Saudi Arabia to drive the Russians out of Afghanistan and why would they attack the US? For what? Politics is not what it seems and I would advise people to use their common sense. Have you ever noticed that all countries surrounding Israel are being threatened by the US while Israel gets away with murder. It has nuclear arsenal, helicopters, tanks, you name it they have it. How is it that Israel has not been sanctioned even though it has not implemented 60 UN resolutions gainst it? Yet punish Iraq for not implementimg one? You have to be dumb not to notice the obvious.
(32) 2007-03-07 11:00:58
Aishas Tears: Quote

"It seems Paul Boulter is living on another planet. No religion teaches violence. "

It seems Salim mustn't have been paying much attention in Madrassah!

I look forward to fighting you people like my Grandfather fought the Nazis and my Father the Communists...
(33) 2007-05-28 22:10:09
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.