Login to post comments | No account yet? Register here
| Was Abdullah Quilliam an Islamist? |
|
|
| Saturday, 26 April 2008 | |
|
Taken from a thread on our forum: As the Quilliam Foundation is exploiting the name of Abdullah Quilliam, it should be made widely known that Abdullah was the exact opposite of Ed Hussain and co. He remained very British after becoming Muslim but was a fierce critic of the government, particularly over foreign policy - unlike "Ed"! It would be useful if some of Shaykh Abdullah's writing on this could be put up on the MPACUK website to show that a Muslim can be completely British, but not a government stooge and sell-out! Such as these examples, taken from yahyabirt.com : Quilliam on Jihad In the name of God, Most Compassionate, Most Merciful! Peace be to all True-Believers to whom this shall come! Know ye, O Muslims, that the British Government has decided to commence military and warlike operations against the Muslims of the Soudan, who have taken up arms to defend their country and their faith. And it is in contemplation to employ Muslim soldiers to fight against these Muslims of the Soudan. For any True Believer to take up arms and fight against another Muslim is contrary to the Shariat, and against the law of God and his holy prophet. I warn every True-Believer that if he gives the slightest assistance in this projected expedition against the Muslims of the Soudan, even to the extent of carrying a parcel, or giving a bite of bread to eat or a drink of water to any person taking part in the expedition against these Muslims that he thereby helps the Giaour against the Muslim, and his name will be unworthy to be continued upon the roll of the faithful.
Signed at the Mosque in Liverpool, England, this 10th day of Shawwal, 1313 (which Christians erroneously in their ignorance call the 24th day of March, 1896), ***** And this from the MCB website: "An American explodes a bomb in the crowded streets of Constantinople and slays innocent women and children and , because he calls himself a Christian he is extolled in England as a hero and as a patriot! An Afghan fights for his fatherland in the Khyber Pass, and because he is a Muslim he is denounced as a traitor and a rebel, and his land is to be raided and his wives and children slain. Such is the British Christian logic at the end of the 19th Century in the diamond jubilee year of the reign of the Queen Empress."
Hat tip: Ali Abdullah, a respected member of our forum . Readers have left 15 comments.
shlemazl:
Quote
Another interesting fact. He was an active supporter of Zionism both personally and officially
(1)
2008-04-27 04:19:59
Miranda:
Quote
Hmmm.
Perhaps Ed and his cohorts have tricked the gliterrati and the zion-serpents into supporting a foundation whose namesake was clearly an 'Islamist'? Is Ed really more clever than the zion-monsters?
(2)
2008-04-27 08:13:59
Abdul Qadeer:
Quote
Absolutely amazing. Qulliam sounds exactly like the type of person who the government would now consider a terrorist and who would have been jailed for inciting terrorism.
He said these things at the height of western colonialism and Empire, but not a single word would be out of place today. His words show that this 'war on terror' is nothing more than a War on Islam. Mashallah, we have to thank Ed Hussain and the rest of the 'moderate muslim' traitors, cowards and hypocrites who set up this foundation for showing us that if you are an 'Islamist' or an 'extremist' then you are probably speaking the truth.
(3)
2008-04-27 09:17:58
Taz:
Quote
Don't know about Quilliam but "Ed" Hussain IS a neo-con professional Muslim apologist.
(4)
2008-04-27 10:44:19
Naz:
Quote
Another interesting fact. He was an active supporter of Zionism both personally and officially — shlemazlYes that is interesting can you please state your source for that.
(5)
2008-04-27 10:44:40
Mohammed:
Quote
Whoever thought of the name of the Quilliam foundation needs to be relieved of his/her responsibility.
(6)
2008-04-27 11:54:49
David:
Quote
LOL, I love it. so it's ok for muslims to conquer the whole world in order to force the entire planet to be muslim but it's not ok for the Western powers to attempt the same???
And this idiot Abdullah Quilliam says the West is hypocritical??? Why is western conquest bad but muslim conquest good? Do enlighten me!
(7)
2008-04-27 16:43:53
shlemazl:
Quote
Naz,
It is a well known fact. You can check out Wikipedia or any other encyclopedia that has an entry on Quilliam.
(8)
2008-04-27 22:45:39
Haseeb:
Quote
A good article.This clearly demonstrates that Abdullah Quilliam was an Islamic activist who rigorously accounted the British government in the 19th century for its imperialistic foreign policy in the Sudan and the Ottoman Caliphate.
He emphasised political unity of the Muslim world on the basis of Islam and the Shariah and not sectarian or nationalistic feelings, or secular justifications for which he was condemned by the media of the time.The parallels to our situation today are striking. This all goes to show what a bunch of charlatans the Quilliam Foundation are, in that they do not even understand the personality of the individual who's name they have taken in vain, for their neo-con/modernist outfit, whose focus is on propagating a twisted, apolitical and truncated version of a government sponsored 'western Islam'.
(9)
2008-04-28 14:59:36
Rob:
Quote
David I do not see any muslim armies invading america and killing-maiming and making refugees of millions to spread islam.
Until then the question is why jews and so called christians are comitting evil against humanity and then claiming to be democrats and champions of human rights. When muslims conquered nations centuries ago they did not slaughter hundreds of millions of humans and wipe out races of people, that is the main and big diffrence.
(10)
2008-04-28 16:04:50
passer by:
Quote
Naz, — shlemazlIt is a well known fact. You can check out Wikipedia or any other encyclopedia that has an entry on Quilliam. you do know that not everything on wikipedia is correct and ideally you should double check from other sources to verify whatever doubt that may be from wikipedia or other internet or unreliable sources. This advice is for the benefit of everyone (including myself). Ma'as salaamah
(11)
2008-04-28 21:00:05
Lord M:
Quote
David I do not see any muslim armies invading america and killing-maiming and making refugees of millions to spread islam. — RobUntil then the question is why jews and so called christians are comitting evil against humanity and then claiming to be democrats and champions of human rights. When muslims conquered nations centuries ago they did not slaughter hundreds of millions of humans and wipe out races of people, that is the main and big diffrence. Well said rob! - neither do i see Muslims throwing londoners out of london because of the Holocause and letting the jews have it instead, and if any londoner complained then shoot them and call them terrorists! There is a big difference between how muslims are behaving and how western countries are!
(12)
2008-04-29 12:38:17
ibrahimhanifawan:
Quote
could anyone shed a little more light on the quilliam foundation and why it is disliked by some? Im no expert and dont have much knowledge on these things, but I was led to believe they were doing a lot of good.
(13)
2008-05-02 00:28:30
muhammad khalil:
Quote
If Brother Quilliam was a Scouser, and i know some of his ancestors who are, how can Akbar Ali, and the people supposedly campaigning for money to rebuild his mosque say to the Scouser that they hired to do their publicity film, who is a white non-Muslim, and a Scouser with all the openness and good will in the World, that they don't want any Scousers in their film, meaning Scouse Muslims. This not only insulted the film amker, who then feeling insulted, withdrew his efforts and rightly accused then of racism, which any true Muslim knows is an anathema to the Prophet Muhammad saws. These same people who have already given Muslims a bad name, are continuing to perpetuate their dispicable racist cult for material ends, glibly insulting the graciousness of their host country, and old Arab proverb is "never insult a man in his own house" a Yemeni proverb tells us " The foriegner shoudl be polite", these peole are not true Muslims they are what Rasulullah called the identity of a dung beetle. This poor Englushman came to me with his story as I am a true non-racist Muslim, and a Scouser born and bred, and he offered me the footage of these people as proof, he is a film maker, an investigative journalist, and a man of conscience and integrity, which the racist Abdullah Quilliam carpet baggers obviously are not. I felt so shamed. This happened a long time ago, and I had meant to keep it to myself, but even now the truth, the indignation, the injustice, and the contempt for these dung beetles is bursting out of me. Allahu Alim may they know in no uncertain terms the dung beetles, and racist, corrupt scum that they are. For this footage will be the end of them if Allah so wills it. Peace be upon you. Muhammad Khalil.
(14)
2008-05-28 15:36:08
Adil Ali:
Quote
Muhammad Kahlil, you are getting mixed up between the Quilliam Foundation and the Abdullah Quillan Society. 2 totally different things. The AQ Society is small charitable organisation based in Liverpol purely to try to raise funds to rebuild an old mosque in Liverpool. The QF is something totally different.
(15)
2008-06-30 19:09:31
|




Shaikh Abdullah Quilliam was a native Englishman from Liverpool who converted to Islam and helped established Britain’s first mosque. He is also the personality that the Quilliam Foundation have chosen to named themselves after. Its therefore a little ironic that by the Quilliam Foundation's own standards, Abdullah Quilliam would probably be considered an Islamist.










