Adverts

Please click on our sponsors to show your support

Journalism Diversity Fund
Labour Vice Chair Backs Apartheid Israel Print E-mail
Thursday, 17 April 2008
stephen_ladyman_mp.jpgMPACUK Comment:
Labour Party Vice Chairman - Stephen Ladyman wrote an article in the Guardian’s Comment Is Free blog today. He sides with the Israelis and decries the situation in Sderot. He also objects to former US president Jimmy Carter engaging in dialogue with Hamas in a bid to find a political solution.

So is Mr Ladyman a fool or Knave? Neither. He is a fully paid up member of the Zionist lobby. He is a member of Labour Friends of Israel – the secretive lobby group that has influenced British foreign policy for far too long. He visits Israel at the expense of the lobby. He therefore talks about a situation without any context. He blames the oppressed and sides with the oppressor ignoring the depravity of the Israelis and their apartheid state. His empathy extends only to Israeli children and not Palestinian ones who suffer even more. Read his article below.


What I learned in Sderot

President Carter is in the Middle East, hoping to visit Gaza and determined to "engage" with Hamas unconditionally. At least he has, on the way, paid a visit to Sderot.

Sderot is a town in the western Negev, in the southern district of Israel. It has shops and schools and all the normal trappings of civilisation. On a sunny day in April, it feels like the sort of pleasant town where families can build a life and children can grow happy and strong.

But look a little closer. A builder sits and smokes at a table in the yard of a house that looks as though it is being demolished, but who demolishes a house by removing just half the roof and then gutting the inside of the living areas? Why are the bus shelters made of concrete and without windows? And why do the children in the infant school play inside the building even on a sunny day, and why are there massive blocks of concrete blocking the sunshine from their classrooms?

The town's police station provides the answer. There you'll find racks, four deep and built around the edge of the car park, of spent missile cases, each painted to proudly display the colours of the organisation that fired it. They look like an anti-war installation put on display at Tate Modern, except these are no entry for the Turner prize; they are the remains of missiles and mortars fired at Sderot.

But it is when you visit one of the local schools that you really begin to appreciate the tragedy being played out here. The children play indoors because when the air raid siren sounds, an explosion is only 15 seconds away. They are wise to do so, the school wall is splattered with saucer-sized holes made by shrapnel from a missile that only just missed the main building.

The concrete blocks that shut out the light from the classrooms can provide them with protection from missiles armed with several kilograms of high explosive, and the children feel safer in school than they do in their own homes. That may now be a false sense of security as the latest missiles aimed at them include some with more than enough power to breach these concrete reinforcements.

Of course, they have to spend the night at home where they have a much lower level of protection and the missiles are fired throughout the night for maximum psychological effect. They also have to get from home to school and back again in the evening, and it is while the children are out in the open they are most at risk, so the hour of the school run is also the peak time for missile attack.

This town of Sderot, which Ivan Lewis, the MP for Bury South, and myself visited last week, is a town of ordinary working people, a town within the 1967 Israeli borders without military or strategic significance, a town where women, children and men try to build their normal lives. But it is also a town that is every day, day in and day out, targeted by missile attack from Gaza.

Two years ago, it had a population of about 20,000, but today the population is around a quarter smaller and those who remain do so out of stubborn heroism, because they and their families have lived there for three generations or because they cannot afford to move, as very few people would be willing to buy their home.

Those of us who live in Britain, perhaps especially those of us who are on the left of politics, are sometimes tempted to excuse the actions of people who we perceive to be fighting for a cause we support - and most of us do support a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians. And in the case of Gaza and Sderot, maybe we can be forgiven for not having screamed as loudly as we should in protest at the actions of Hamas, as the media in the UK - with a few honourable exceptions - seem to have almost no interest in telling the story of what is going on from an Israeli viewpoint.

In the absence of facts, it is all too easy to fill the vacuum that results with the romance of struggle. But what is happening to Sderot demands our unanimous and unambiguous revulsion. What Hamas and its allies, such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the al-Aqsa Martyr Brigade, are doing from Gaza cannot be excused, and it cannot be dignified as freedom fighting. What they are doing is inhuman, brutal and repressive and brings shame on the Palestinian cause and anyone, even someone as well-intentioned as President Carter, who tries to engage with them, needs to understand the depth of their depravity.

Hamas must stop these attacks now. If they do not, then sooner or later, the Israelis, who have shown far more restraint than we would tolerate from our own government if missiles were falling on a British town, will have no choice but to respond.

The paintings that the school children display on their school room wall say it all. They are not the pictures of dogs or family that British children paint. They are pictures of missiles falling from the sky, expressions of torment such as daubs of red and black scribbles obliterating the whole page; and they are pleas, in Hebrew, for mercy. "We have had enough, our blood is not second class," reads one. The governments and citizens of the world, and especially those of us who profess to believe in peace, should hear that child's plea.

Article Source : The Guardian



Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Live!Facebook!Technorati!Spurl!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Readers have left 13 comments.
Onlooker: Quote

heaven forfend that an MP doesnt take the side of the Palestinians in any debate on Israel!

I think its a bit hypocritical to be talking about the Israel lobby in the UK when mpacuk are lobbying against Boris Johnson for being a 'zionist islamophobe' - how about voting for someone on grounds other than their alleged views on Musilms?

Just because you hate Israel doesnt mean that the Israeli side of the argument has no value.

The civillians of Sderot have been deliberately targeted by the palestinians whereas the operations by the IDF kills palestinians because their 'brave warriors' always hide behind the women and children.

No more rockets no more retailiation - very very simple!
(1) 2008-04-18 09:24:31
Taz: Quote

Ladyman sides with the oppressors and with a racist ideology. New Labour has sold its soul to the devil.
(2) 2008-04-18 10:21:59
shan: Quote

what do you expect from labour scum who have been carrying out a plan of villification of british citizens who are muslims.
since labour scum came to power it been nothing but a never ending bad dream and to think there are still so called muslims who vote for labour.
you go abroad for a holiday and when you comeback they set dogs on you and when you come to the counter they want to know what you did on holiday were you went and why,add to that they wan to know where you work.
I bet you they do not ask white christian men coming from thailand-cambodia-vietnam-india and other countries where they go to carry out their paedophillia as to what they have been doing while on holiday.
in my opinion britain is turning out to be terrorist state for muslims as they are banged up on trumped up charges.
(3) 2008-04-18 11:27:22
Barbarossa: Quote

This is what happens when Muslims do not get involved in Politics! - someone smack HT in the mouth!
(4) 2008-04-18 11:45:33
JD: Quote

Shock horror, Labour MP supports Israel. So what's new? And as you are supporting the Labour party uncritically in the Mayoral/GLA elections, your articles are beginning to sound a tad hypocritical in all honesty.
(5) 2008-04-18 15:11:09
Sultan (in Oxford): Quote

Assaalam walaikum and Greetings

All parties have some MPs and members who are pro-Israel. This is either because of their family background, or because of the support the MPs have.

The fact that this MP is pro-Israel and belongs to Labour, does not mean that somehow the Labour Party itself is pro-Israel and thus anti-Muslim. This does not mean any Muslim thus voting ‘labour’ is only a “so-called” Muslim. This type of association is child-like thinking.

Muslims should understand that all parties have different types of members and MPs. Most (I believe) are genuinely neutral, some of which are swayed in one specific direction due to the MPs supporters.

The Jewish People do not sit on their backsides like the Muslims do. They are pro-active in the sense that they invite MPs into the State of Israel using their own funds. They get the MP to see for himself the conditions that the Israelis live under. They take the MPs to where they wish to take them and prove to the MPs that it is the Israelis who are the victims. As an added measure, I wouldn’t be surprised if they then use the holocaust to remind the MPs the suffering that the Jewish endured and still endure today. So, neutral MPs become more inclined to speak up for Israel based upon what they have personally seen.

This is a fact of live. You are more inclined to believe in something you have personally experienced.

Of course, some MPs are wined and dinned by the Jewish so that the MPs are somehow affiliated with them.

But what do we Muslims do, in comparison ?

We say, ‘voting is haraam’.
We complain when MPs take the side of Israel.
We complain at the lack of inaction of MPs to better the state of the Palestinians.

How many Muslims have actually taken an MP abroad to the occupied territories, so that the MPs can see for themselves the misery of the Palestinians due to the Israeli actions ?.
Probably NILL.

But how many Muslims have approached their MP because their family member was refused a VISA into the UK, or they were rejected for Council Housing. Probably, MANY TIMEs.

And Muslims wonder why we have pro-Israeli MPs ?, and why others do nothing.

We only jump up and down with joy when a MP with human conscious has the guts to speak up against Israeli policies and sympathises with the sufferings of the Palestinians. We then surround this MP with pride.

Beyond that, I feel Muslims are all talk, and gutless.

They would rather give a few 10’s of pounds in Charity to the Palestinians, in the hope of alleviating their condition and pretend they have done something useful. Rather than spend a few hundreds and take an MP to the occupied territories so that he/she can see for themselves the sufferings and make the UK government take note and influence its policies.

But, ‘voting is haraam’. And Muslims must not get into Politics.

After many decades in the UK, we still don’t understand it do we.
Muslims are themselves, their worst enemies.

Wasalaams and Regards
(6) 2008-04-18 15:43:19
Paul M: Quote

By 'Apartheid State' I assume we mean Israel is like South Africa under Apartheid. Is that the case? What were the seminal features of Apartheid South Africa?

- In South Africa, Blacks were a c. 80% majority. In Israel, Jews are a c. 80% majority.

- In South Africa, Blacks were not permitted to vote or sit in Parliament. In Israel, Arabs do vote and sit in Parliament (and the cabinet and in the supreme court).

- In South Africa, sexual and marital relations between Blacks and Whites were illegal. In Israel, sexual and marital relationsh between Jews and Arabs are legal. All marriages must be under the auspices of a religious authority (a hang-over from the day of Turkish Islamic law) but non-religious marriages effected outside the country are recognised.

But then last night on Newsnight we had someone who claimed to be a judge on a Sharia court suggesting Britain is an apartheid state, so these terms are coming to be emptied of their meaning.

The key features of South African apartheid (a racially defined majority prevented from civic rights such as the vote and particiation in public life, and prevented from mixing with the ruling minority) are simply absent in the case of Israel.

As I have suggested before, the endless analogies between Israel and Hell, Nazi Germany, South African apartheid etc. are so lacking in credibility that they do a lot of damage to the Palestinian cause.

Sultan is right - Muslims are themselves their own worst enemies, and this goes beyond the fact that 90% of Mulim deaths in conflict over the past fifty years have been inflicted by other Muslims.

By the way Sultan, a group of MPs did go to the Gaza strip last week. They ended up under Kassam fire. So maybe it was not such a good idea from the Palestinian perspective.
(7) 2008-04-18 16:51:36
shan: Quote

Muslims have been solid labour voters for 50 years,in some areas where muslims are in the clear majority they have bought in people from outside to become MPs but not local people,yet the people still voted for them.
labour repaid the muslim vote by introducing muslim specific laws to target the muslims and cow them.
if you are muslim and use freedom of speech you will be locked up using by hook or crook laws we will get you.
Having written to MPs i can tell you that they do give a hoots about what you say,as long as muslim nations are weak they will find a way to justify their selective laws to be used against muslims based on collective guilt.
It is all quite easy telling people to take MPs on trips and wine and dine them to get your viewpoint accross but in reality you can take all the MPs to palestine and they still will not help the palestinians, as it is not in their interests to do so.
(8) 2008-04-18 18:15:07
K. Urban: Quote

Give him a bung and he's yours
- a tart in a suit.
(9) 2008-04-18 23:01:44
Taz: Quote

Shock horror, Labour MP supports Israel. So what's new? And as you are supporting the Labour party uncritically in the Mayoral/GLA elections, your articles are beginning to sound a tad hypocritical in all honesty.
— JD


JD you are quite obviously too stupid for politics. It's beyond the abilities of your fragile mind. Go and sit in the corner and have your medicine. Silly boy.
(10) 2008-04-18 23:59:21
K Urban: Quote

Before being sacked as minister by Gordon Brown, Dr Stephen Ladyman he was the minister responsible when millions of driving test records went missing at a secure facility.

(''What a 42 carat plonker Rodney'')

He also failed to inform the new minister about the loss.

Buy the man a free holiday in Israel and he will probably leave his conscience in a a bag at Terminal 5.
(11) 2008-04-19 07:53:53
Madam: Quote

Expel this charlatan from Britain.

If he is such a Zion-lover let him go and stand for the Knessett. I'm sure they will kiss him till he joins the IDF.

Israel-lovers disgust me.

Just as (rightly) Nazi-sympathisers disgust the Jews.
(12) 2008-04-20 09:45:14
JD: Quote

"JD you are quite obviously too stupid for politics. It's beyond the abilities of your fragile mind. Go and sit in the corner and have your medicine. Silly boy."

I'm not the one throwing around empty insults. I'm also not the one praising the Labour party candidate uncritically and wondering why they get away with murder of fellow Muslims? Yes, what very 'stupid' politics I hold. I'm not the one that doesn't understand that it is possible to be critical of Labour and still help to keep Boris out.
(13) 2008-04-20 10:47:16
Please keep your comments brief and on topic, and remember that this is not a discussion thread.
Name :
E-mail :
Comment(s) :
Verify :
What color is often used to describe the sky ?