Choose Your Region

UK-Region IRELAND-region

MPACUK LEEDS

Adverts/Promotions

Powered by: MuslimPages
 
Kent Muslim Welfare Association Halal Hamper CHL Properties When Slaves Become the Masters Journalism Diversity Fund Stop War On Iran

Disclaimer: MPACUK does not select these automated ads.


Subscribe to our newsletter:


Zio-Con Policy Exchange Busted! But Not By Sleeping Mosques! Print E-mail
Thursday, 13 December 2007

target.jpgA rightwing thinktank which claimed to have uncovered extremist literature on sale at dozens of British mosques was last night accused of basing a report on fabricated evidence.

The report by Policy Exchange alleged that books condoning violent jihad and encouraging hatred of Christians, Jews and gays were being sold in a quarter of the 100 mosques visited. But BBC2's Newsnight said examination of receipts provided by the researchers to verify their purchases showed some had been written by the same person – even though they purported to come from different mosques. Several receipts also misspelled the names or addresses of the mosques where the books were supposedly sold.

The report, the Hijacking of British Islam, was based on the work of four teams of two researchers each who visited 100 mosques. They claimed to have found the controversial material in bookshops attached to 25 mosques, including one at Regent's Park, London, and others in Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Oxford and High Wycombe.

Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: "Policy Exchange produced a report that was given a lot of publicity, and Newsnight deserve credit for exposing the incredibly shoddy and dubious methodology that Policy Exchange have resorted to. It would seem that Policy Exchange had already decided what they wanted to say about mosques and just went out to find or should I say invent the evidence to justify their prejudices."

Guardian, 13 December 2007

Watch video of yesterday's Newsnight programme here

For Osama Saeed's comments, see Rolled Up Trousers, 12 December 2007

The Newsnight investigation concentrated on mosques in and around London but, as Osama points out, questions about the credibility of the Hijacking of British Islam report were raised at the time by the Edinburgh Central Mosque – where nobody had come across the literature that Policy Exchange claimed to have discovered on their premises.

Source: Islamophobia Watch

MPACUK Comment: Another Zionist Group was busted after the Zionists funding the Labour party were ousted. This time the right wing Zio-con have hit the headlines again about their false reports that vilified Muslims and Islam. The shocking thing is the powerful organisations it attacked - 'the mosques' - were so incompetent that they themselves did not launch an investigation into the attack but instead slept through the whole affair. Now tell us they are worthy of running our most powerful institutions. MPACUK again call for open democratic leadership within these bankrupt institutions so the best Muslim minds can lead us, instead of the defeated Muslims who currently are.




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!

Readers have left 24 comments.
ehs: Quote

I took the trouble to go to the Policy Exchange website and noted these comments:-

"Policy Exchange stands by its report The Hijacking of British Islam and the Muslim researchers who took considerable risks to enable its compilation. The report is the most comprehensive and authoritative study to date into the availability of extremist literature within UK Islamic institutions."

It could be that some of teh volunteers faked receipts in order to discredit the report (sabotage) or decided to 'chicken out' by faking receipts while taking the fee for their work.

Clearly, the people at Policy Exchange did not deliberately fake receipts in order to make the report. They accepted the receipts from their researchers in Good Faith.

Why you call them "Zionists" is a mystery.
(1) 2007-12-13 12:41:46
you muppet: Quote

I want to know names who are the people behind polciy exchange. lets drag their names through the mud.

who's their chairman?
managing director?
sponsors?
etc.
(2) 2007-12-13 12:44:53
Barbarossa: Quote

I took the trouble to go to the Policy Exchange website and noted these comments:-

"Policy Exchange stands by its report The Hijacking of British Islam and the Muslim researchers who took considerable risks to enable its compilation. The report is the most comprehensive and authoritative study to date into the availability of extremist literature within UK Islamic institutions."

It could be that some of teh volunteers faked receipts in order to discredit the report (sabotage) or decided to 'chicken out' by faking receipts while taking the fee for their work.

Clearly, the people at Policy Exchange did not deliberately fake receipts in order to make the report. They accepted the receipts from their researchers in Good Faith.

Why you call them "Zionists" is a mystery.
— ehs


Policy exchange is a well known pro Israel think tank, with high profile Zionists in leading positions. Go figure ??
(3) 2007-12-13 12:54:13
Raz: Quote

Note that the report was not exposed by MPACUK, and the slur against the masjids made in the article above is a ignorant one. The Masjids were very aware of these discrepancies and several were considering a legal challenge. Please get your facts right before making ideologicaly motivated assertions.
(4) 2007-12-13 13:22:17
Kal: Quote

In light of the Newsnight investigation, it is right and proper that an investigation is now launched into 'Policy Exchange'. Who are they, why were they formed, what other work have they done, who are the individuals behind them, and what political context do these individuals come from?

There should also be a parallel investigation by the mosques into what is happening in their environments, and if necessarily either a plan to address any concerns or a firm rebuttal if the whole Policy Exchange affair is just another scurrilous piece of racism cloaked as Muslim baiting.
(5) 2007-12-13 13:31:26
Astrism: Quote

Zio-Con? Honestly?

The Policy Exchange is neither Zionist nor neoconservative. I assume that most of its members support the right of Israel to exist, but then again so does MPACUK, doesn't it?

Its thinktank work is One Nation Tory. It is certainly not neo-con.

But, of course, to accept that there is a real problem with extremism in British mosques would mean giving up the paranoid conspiracism about Jews and neo-cons unfairly maligning Islam and looking at root causes like, I dunno, the "hijacking of British Islam" by fascist fanatics?
(6) 2007-12-13 14:18:42
azaad: Quote

Re MPACUK Comment: I couldn't agree with you more. Didn't the accused mosques even try to check out the story, let alone defend their name?

I watched last night's Newsnight and I thought the guy from the 'Policy Exchange' was so incoherent it was hilarious! (I believe it is possible to watch the programme on its website)

I fear that there may have been Zionist (possibly American) involvement, because time and again receipts were spelling 'Centre' with an 'er' not 're'. It was so obvious. They even showed how one receipt had been written whilst resting on top of another (writing impression left on the underlying sheet): the two respective mosques/cent'er's were actually 40 miles apart!

If the allegations are indeed true, then the Police should be involved, and those found responsible should be prosecuted for incitement to racial/religious hatred.

The Zionist (aka racist) element in the media is so pathologically anti-Muslim that it will turn any item of 'news' into an opportunity to portray Muslims as the 'other'. Often this evil bunch will hide behind anonymity of 'sources' and put pet Muslim-Puppets on the screens to mouth their masters' prejudices.

You can take any 'opinion' poll suggesting that 9 out of 10 Muslims think this or that; or 'majority of Muslims' want this or that, with a large bucket of salt. Can you really believe in any 'survey' of Muslims/mosques etc?

BTW what, I wonder, is Ed Hussein's view of the Newsnight findings? (He was well and truly trashed by Dianne Abbott on Andrew Neil's programme last week. Excellent! It seemed that the Muslims she knew were not the ones he did.)

MPAC: why don't you take the lead and ask the Met to look into this?
(7) 2007-12-13 14:22:08
Shirin: Quote

Policy Exchange is a registered charity - somebody needs to complain to the Charity Commission AS WELL
(8) 2007-12-13 14:25:58
Taz: Quote

Policy Exchange, a neo-con think-tank, have a specific anti-Muslim political agenda. Examining the of people associated with the group reveals their extreme anti-Muslim sentiments. Their timing was a stunt to embarrass the Saudis and their research methodology has already been discredited by others. What this Newsnight report shows is that beyond methodology it is their ant-Muslim motive that needs to be questioned. Michael Gove, Dennis Macshane, Charles Moore, Dean Godson. All of them have an Islamophobic tendency and all of them supporters of Israel. Hmmm I wonder if there is a correlation between Zionists and Islamophobia?
(9) 2007-12-13 14:46:37
Yakoub/Julaybib: Quote

A few facts to put together to suggest a connection. Policy Exchange is, despite its own denials, widely viewed as being Neoconservative. Researchers for this report are now on a Sufi retreat. Policy Exchange has, in the past, stated its sympathy and support for the Sufi Muslim Council. The Sufi Muslim Council has links to other Neocon organisations, most notably the Hudson Institute. Both Hudson and the SMC are vehemently anti-Wahhabi. Were the researchers recruited via the SMC? If so, Newsnight's bullet would pass straight through PE and pierce the SMC. It would explain why the director of PE didn't want to researchers to be seen on camera!
(10) 2007-12-13 14:58:09
shamsur: Quote

They can try all they want, but one thing that makes the UK different from the USA is that, we are not fools.

The Policy Exchange and their sister organsiations are driving the blind people of the USA to one war after another. lets hope the UK is more sensible in future and not listen to everything zionist or zionist funded organsiations say and do.
(11) 2007-12-13 16:35:40
Tahira: Quote

Charles Moore - infamous Zionist journalist, and former Telegraph editor, is Chair of their Board of trustees
(12) 2007-12-13 18:10:21
Ray: Quote

Make your mind MPAC whose side are you on? You are no better than Policy Exchange when you attack mosques at every opportunity you can get. The Zionists can relax when you are doing their job for them.
(13) 2007-12-13 18:15:53
RSD: Quote

The following is the board of Policy Exchange.
The Chairman of our Board of Trustees is Charles Moore. The other Trustees are Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Richard Ehrman, Robin Edwards, George Robinson, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson and Rachel Whetstone.
The scope of the Policy Exchange's work does not suggest any association with Zionism. It relates to UK national policy and social development.
The claims made against this report appear to be that the researchers did not obtain the books / material from the mosques they claim. Yet no one has claimed that the books and materials are fakes. If such material is available nevertheless on a narrower basis, it is still cause for serious concern.
(14) 2007-12-13 19:04:00
William: Quote

Can MPAC tell me how widespread is the sale in mosques of literature that is, for example
- homophobic
- inciting religious hatred
- inciting violence
Is there practically none, a little at the margins, or really quite a lot? I'm more interested in what's really happening there than in who runs some policy institute I never heard of.
(15) 2007-12-13 22:07:30
jimbob: Quote

Seriously, there isn't a single publication on the Policy Exchange website about Israel but somehow they're a "well known pro Israel think tank"

Utter bollocks
(16) 2007-12-14 01:12:47
Barbarossa: Quote

Zio-Con? Honestly?

The Policy Exchange is neither Zionist nor neoconservative. I assume that most of its members support the right of Israel to exist, but then again so does MPACUK, doesn't it?

Its thinktank work is One Nation Tory. It is certainly not neo-con.

But, of course, to accept that there is a real problem with extremism in British mosques would mean giving up the paranoid conspiracism about Jews and neo-cons unfairly maligning Islam and looking at root causes like, I dunno, the "hijacking of British Islam" by fascist fanatics?
— Astrism


To claim the PE is not Zio-con when the current head of it is the notorious Zionist editor who himself claims he is a Neo-con is beyond belief!

Once again Zionists trying to hide and say its not 'us' honestly! If the shoes fits.......
(17) 2007-12-14 13:12:52
Barbarossa: Quote

Make your mind MPAC whose side are you on? You are no better than Policy Exchange when you attack mosques at every opportunity you can get. The Zionists can relax when you are doing their job for them.
— Ray


Are you saying the Mosques should be allowed to get off scott free???

Those fonts of all idiocy did not even know the report had written about them despite it being in every national newspaper in the country! How stupid are they?
(18) 2007-12-14 13:19:09
Barbarossa: Quote

Seriously, there isn't a single publication on the Policy Exchange website about Israel but somehow they're a "well known pro Israel think tank"

Utter bollocks
— jimbob


Seriously there is not a single one of the leading management that is not well know pro Israel Hawk .... the only one who is talking utter Bol****s is you.

I think your trying to hide it a bit too much, that its becoming almost a desperate attempt to cover a smoking gun. I say - if they are holding it - THEY DID IT!
(19) 2007-12-14 13:32:12
Barbarossa: Quote

Can MPAC tell me how widespread is the sale in mosques of literature that is, for example
- homophobic
- inciting religious hatred
- inciting violence
Is there practically none, a little at the margins, or really quite a lot? I'm more interested in what's really happening there than in who runs some policy institute I never heard of.
— William


Just as soon as you tell the rest of us posters how many Jewish extremists go and fight in Palestine every year and how many children they kill before they return home?
(20) 2007-12-14 14:09:48
ehs: Quote

There are two main points being argued:-

1. Are PE a Zionist-supporting Organisastion?

2. Why did their researchers furnish fake receipts?

It seems to me that RSD has shown you that it isn't a Zionist Organisation. MPAC UK commenters seem to have a frnzy for finding "Jews" and "Zionists" behind everything they don't like. Yet they suggest the UK is heading towards Nazi Germany status!

So, why DID the researchers (who were Muslims because they needed to be in order to mingle with the Mosques) furnish fake receipts. Its either deception against PE (in which case its a police matter) or it may have been a plan to volunteer for the work, wait for the report and then snitch to Newsnight.

Since the management of PE and authors had no inkling that the receipts were fakes, and so happily handed them over, who DID know they were fake and so could snitch? It comes back to some rogue researchers.

I will bet a fortune that it turns out to be a sting by the researchers who were supposed to buy books.
(21) 2007-12-14 15:35:13
ehs: Quote

Seriously, there isn't a single publication on the Policy Exchange website about Israel but somehow they're a "well known pro Israel think tank"

Utter bollocks
— Barbarossa


Seriously there is not a single one of the leading management that is not well know pro Israel Hawk .... the only one who is talking utter Bol****s is you.

I think your trying to hide it a bit too much, that its becoming almost a desperate attempt to cover a smoking gun. I say - if they are holding it - THEY DID IT!
— jimbob


So, you can tell us all about "The Chairman of our Board of Trustees is Charles Moore. The other Trustees are Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Richard Ehrman, Robin Edwards, George Robinson, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson and Rachel Whetstone"

What is Rachel's stance on Annapolis? Does George Robinson favour an invasion of Gaza?

Well, if these are "well-known Israeli hawks" you would have the answer at your fingertips. I will venture that you know very little about the politics of these, supposed, "well-know Israeli hawks". Are they all Israelis then?

I dislike hyperbole and the tar brush.
(22) 2007-12-14 17:58:08
Barbarossa: Quote

Seriously, there isn't a single publication on the Policy Exchange website about Israel but somehow they're a "well known pro Israel think tank"

Utter bollocks
— ehs


Seriously there is not a single one of the leading management that is not well know pro Israel Hawk .... the only one who is talking utter Bol****s is you.

I think your trying to hide it a bit too much, that its becoming almost a desperate attempt to cover a smoking gun. I say - if they are holding it - THEY DID IT!
— Barbarossa


So, you can tell us all about "The Chairman of our Board of Trustees is Charles Moore. The other Trustees are Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Richard Ehrman, Robin Edwards, George Robinson, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson and Rachel Whetstone"

What is Rachel's stance on Annapolis? Does George Robinson favour an invasion of Gaza?

Well, if these are "well-known Israeli hawks" you would have the answer at your fingertips. I will venture that you know very little about the politics of these, supposed, "well-know Israeli hawks". Are they all Israelis then?

I dislike hyperbole and the tar brush.
— jimbob


Why are you desperate to ensure they are not seen as Israel's boyz? ....any particular reason? ... you seem to go out of your way to get Israel and these guys out of the frying pan?

Just wondering if you have anything to hide?
(23) 2007-12-14 18:40:44
al: Quote

How many times must the bbc be shown up!! This again proves that this organisation does not represent Britain in any form. There is NOTHING British in the bbc, the Americans call it the blair broadcasting corporation. They say that the bbc will be treated EXACTLY the same as so called America (foreign controlled) and the target audience is outside Europe, well bbc has failed miserably on that issue.
(24) 2007-12-15 19:04:37
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.
 
Media Workshops

Search MPACUK.org

Recommended Books