Letter from the Public - EXPOSED: Zionists Behind the recent Labour Cash Row Print E-mail
Thursday, 29 November 2007

mpac_breaking_news.jpgLabours Zionist friend have landed the party in trouble again. Less than 6 months after Lord Levy (Pro-Israeli fundraiser for Labour) was questioned during the cash for honours affair.

Labours new chief fundraiser Jon Mendelsohn (Former Labour friends of Israel chair) has landed the party in trouble again. By accepting donations for Labour from Jewish Businessman and former Labour Friends of Israel activist David Abrahams via 3rd parties, Jon Mendelshon has contributed towards tarnishing the image of the party in public.

Jon Mendelsohn is listed as the 28th most influential person in "British Jewry" by the Jewish Chronicle earlier this year. The paper wrote: "At ease in the corridors of power, Mendelsohn has the contacts and know-how to advance Israel's case in his LFI role."

Paying for a pro-Israeli view in Labour politics may soon backfire on LFI activists and bring the Labour party into jeopardy. When will MPAC expose this!

Kind Regards,

M. M. Islam
Birmingham

MPACUK urges you to also consider why are Muslim Leaders not teaching us to get involved in funding political parties to counter the pro Israel lobby funding machine that buys influence to both demonise us or wage war? To prove how out of touch Muslim leaders are including student leaders, do this simple test, if you are attending a talk over the next few weeks ask yourself why your student Islamic society decided to talk about minor points of arcane knowledge and not on the pressing issues of today. If we don’t educate our young minds – is it any wonder we have no counter to the power of these men who hurt British Democracy more than any terrorist bomb could, and hold in their hands the power to harm our community?

Its time our Leaders educated us - not put us to sleep.

If you want to get involved in the political battle – join MPACUK today or come along to one of our branch meetings.

Email us at info@mpacuk.org for more information.




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Live!Facebook!Technorati!Spurl!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Readers have left 33 comments.
Delila: Quote

What difference does it make? You have an obsession about Jews that is unhealthy.

Shall we have to start responding with stories of electoral frauds. We know what religion THEY are!
(1) 2007-11-29 07:40:04
Delila: Quote

Also, you seem to have published a libel by suggesting that "John Mendelsohn has landed the party in trouble" as Gordon Brown stated in the House of Commons Mr Mendelsohn only started in September WELL BEFORE the donations were made and so had NOTHING to do with them. Perhaps you shouldn't let your hate blind you to the truth.
(2) 2007-11-29 07:42:46
Syed: Quote

What difference does it make? You have an obsession about Jews that is unhealthy.
— Delila
What are you on about? It makes no difference whether Mendelsohn or Abrahams are Jewish or not - this is about LFI influencing a democratic party by non-democratic means!
(3) 2007-11-29 08:04:05
you muppet: Quote

i dont know about anyone else, but i want to know if Jewish business are giving money to labour, the same way i want to know if Muslims are forcing their communities to vote for labour and what faith drives the Prime Minister. I want to know because it is my right to know and if someones faith, or race makes then act in a way (i.e supports Israel) i want to know.
(4) 2007-11-29 08:13:47
Delila: Quote

Jewish name. You disgusting Antisemites "outing the Jew". What difference does it make? You have an obsession about Jews that is unhealthy.
— Syed
What are you on about? It makes no difference whether Mendelsohn or Abrahams are Jewish or not - this is about LFI influencing a democratic party by non-democratic means!
— Delila


Is the name on the cheque "LFI"?

Does this mean that NO succesful businessman may make a donation to a political party if they happen to be Jewish or a supporter of Israel?

In that sense you are suggesting that Jews aren't allowed to make political donations simply because they are Jews. That is Antisemitism as naked and as obvious as it gets.

Why was the name "Lord Levy brought up. Is HE a Friend of Israel who donated money to buy influence?

Should all Jews be barred by Law from donating money?
(5) 2007-11-29 08:13:49
Delila: Quote

i dont know about anyone else, but i want to know if Jewish business are giving money to labour, the same way i want to know if Muslims are forcing their communities to vote for labour and what faith drives the Prime Minister. I want to know because it is my right to know and if someones faith, or race makes then act in a way (i.e supports Israel) i want to know.
— you muppet


An Antisemite like you would want to know every movement of a Jew.
(6) 2007-11-29 08:19:55
shem: Quote

I was expecting this yesterday - I was surprised that MPAC hadn't touched it. I stupidly thought that as this man Abrahams was just funding the party so he could build an industrial estate his religion would have nothing to do with it. It was Newsignight who outed him the other day when there was no relevance to the story. The fact he was LFI - WAS - is as pertinent as if he belonged to the local darts club, unless you are watching out for people surnames to reinforce your racial stereotypes. Here was a chance for MPAC to show their true colours.

Why doesn't MPACUK start a campaign to free the English teacher in Sudan? - that would be much more in British Muslims' interests.
(7) 2007-11-29 09:03:59
azaad: Quote

Dear MPAC,

Whilst I detest LFI (it ought really to stand for Labour Friends of Inhumanity), I think you are wrong in this instance in suggesting that this unlawful (?criminal) funding situation has anything to do with the Jewishness of the main behind-the-scenes players.

OK some in the Jewish community may look at the rest of the world as 'Goyim', created by God because 'SOMEone had to buy retail!', as a Jewish acquaintance of mine once said to me, but I think you will find that Jews have been Labour supporters from the year dot.

So, some unsavoury characters may have acted unlawfully (yet to be established), and without scruple (yet to be established), but then again is it not the case that anything or anyone touched by Israel takes a lax view of the 'law'. How else do you explain otherwise clever people gleefully quaffing clarets at 'fund-raising' dinners and thereby flouting umpteen UN regulations, and trampling on Palestinian women and children.
(8) 2007-11-29 09:36:16
Syed: Quote

Does this mean that NO succesful businessman may make a donation to a political party if they happen to be Jewish or a supporter of Israel?
— Delila
There's a difference between those that support Israel as a home for the Jews, and those that additionally also support the right-wing and imperialistic policies of Israel. Muslims don't care if the former make a party donation, whether they are Jewish or not, but they DO have an interest if the latter make a donation (again, regardless of faith or race) as THAT donation can influence the British party into introducing foreign policy that assists in further oppression of the Palestinians.

If you read the article properly, you'll see that this is a letter from the public, the part in italics are MPAC's own comments, where rather than call for the banning of donations from Jewish or pro-Israeli groups, as you suggest in a rather paranoid manner, they simply state that why aren't there any pro-Muslims lobbies doing the same? Thus negating your silly claims of anti-semitism.
(9) 2007-11-29 09:42:30
Hari: Quote

Sorry to blow a hole in your thesis MPAC, but Abrahams only became a donor after he was booted out of Labour Friends of Israel for being too close to Hamas.
(10) 2007-11-29 10:05:18
you muppet: Quote


why is this an mpac issue, I saw the same stuff including his race being Jewish on the BBC, Guardian and Telegraph. Me thinks you guys are Islamophobic and are trying to ensure that Muslims can't use Jew as a descriptive word.

He donated money illegally to gain influence to further a zionist agenda.

your damn right muslims want to know about it.
(11) 2007-11-29 10:42:23
shem: Quote

you muppet

last I heard he donated money to influence the building permission for an industrial estate - was it perhaps a Zionist Industrial Zone?
you muppet
(12) 2007-11-29 10:57:18
shem: Quote

However, it is true - Jews should not be involved in such dodgy dealings (although a Jew can be criminal like anyone else). Jews should behave in public life to the high(er) moral standards that the Patriarchs/Torah/Commentaries gave to the world.
(13) 2007-11-29 11:10:44
you muppet: Quote

shem

if it was a muslim it would be front news page, and no mention of Palestine etc.

After all how many times have you heard that Shahid Malik is a muslim minister, or Faizal Bodi is a Muslim Journalist.

one rule for jews and another for Muslims is it?

also he was a Friemd of Israel and had discussions with Brown regarding the middle east. i wanna know what was said.

and why brown allowed it to happen.

and what the Jewish community is doing about it?
(14) 2007-11-29 12:03:22
shem: Quote

you muppet

I agree - it's obviously more obvious that a Muslim in the news is a Muslim (with or without the need to tell us). Who had a talk with Brown about the Midlle east - Abrahams or Mendelson? why can't he/they talk about the middle east. and what does it matter - according to many Jewish Zionists have such a MASSIVE influence over UK foreign policy how could these two have any more effect? I repeat: why can't a jew discuss the ME with a politician? It's Labour that stinks, not the Jewish community - why do you hold the community responsible. Is the Muslim community responsible for the actions of some members?
(15) 2007-11-29 12:30:48
shem: Quote

so jews/friends of Israel/zionists (call them what you will) are not allowed to talk to politicians without your say-so??!!
(16) 2007-11-29 12:33:51
shan: Quote

There are criminals in all communities and they should be judged for their crimes.
you cannot label jews-muslims or christians for the crimes of individuals or governments.
i hope bigots remember this when commenting on others.
(17) 2007-11-29 12:43:43
MelanieP: Quote


why is this an mpac issue, I saw the same stuff including his race being Jewish on the BBC, Guardian and Telegraph. Me thinks you guys are Islamophobic and are trying to ensure that Muslims can't use Jew as a descriptive word.

He donated money illegally to gain influence to further a zionist agenda.

your damn right muslims want to know about it.
— you muppet


That is what we call "Libel". Of course, MPAC UK can sustain it or delete it.
(18) 2007-11-29 13:15:00
MelanieP: Quote

Does this mean that NO succesful businessman may make a donation to a political party if they happen to be Jewish or a supporter of Israel?
— Syed
There's a difference between those that support Israel as a home for the Jews, and those that additionally also support the right-wing and imperialistic policies of Israel. Muslims don't care if the former make a party donation, whether they are Jewish or not, but they DO have an interest if the latter make a donation (again, regardless of faith or race) as THAT donation can influence the British party into introducing foreign policy that assists in further oppression of the Palestinians.

If you read the article properly, you'll see that this is a letter from the public, the part in italics are MPAC's own comments, where rather than call for the banning of donations from Jewish or pro-Israeli groups, as you suggest in a rather paranoid manner, they simply state that why aren't there any pro-Muslims lobbies doing the same? Thus negating your silly claims of anti-semitism.
— Delila


MPAC UK is publisihing the letter - hence MPAC UK is sustaining the contents of the letter and endorsing the contents.

They did NOT disassociate themselves from the views expressed.
(19) 2007-11-29 14:44:45
Syed: Quote

MPAC UK is publisihing the letter - hence MPAC UK is sustaining the contents of the letter and endorsing the contents.

They did NOT disassociate themselves from the views expressed.
— MelanieP
So what? Neither the letter nor MPAC's comments are anti-Semitic. They do not call for the banning of donations from Jews, nor do either claim it's illegal for lobby groups to make donations. Delila's charges of antisemitism are baseless.
(20) 2007-11-29 15:22:25
MelanieP: Quote

MPAC UK is publisihing the letter - hence MPAC UK is sustaining the contents of the letter and endorsing the contents.

They did NOT disassociate themselves from the views expressed.
— Syed
So what? Neither the letter nor MPAC's comments are anti-Semitic. They do not call for the banning of donations from Jews, nor do either claim it's illegal for lobby groups to make donations. Delila's charges of antisemitism are baseless.
— MelanieP


Only the victim qualifies for defining whether racial hate is being spread about them. Therefore, YOU cannot define if its Antisemitism or not. I have seen articles about this subject by Jewish people who state that it is Antisemitic. I take their word as the victim/target.
(21) 2007-11-30 08:24:07
wendy mann: Quote

Is the name on the cheque "LFI"?

Should all Jews be barred by Law from donating money?
— Delila


jewish people no.

but zionists and pro zionists as the members of the various varieties of 'friends of israel' are - should be seen as buying influence on behalf of the zionist regime in israeli politics.

it is why we cannot expect a fair resolution of the palestinian issue, its why we supported the war in iraq and lebanon, its why we will be attacking iran.

one cannot be a neo conservative without being a pro zionist and Blair famously stated that israel has not greater friend than he.


(22) 2007-11-30 19:46:56
MelanieP: Quote

Is the name on the cheque "LFI"?

Should all Jews be barred by Law from donating money?
— wendy mann


jewish people no.

but zionists and pro zionists as the members of the various varieties of 'friends of israel' are - should be seen as buying influence on behalf of the zionist regime in israeli politics.

it is why we cannot expect a fair resolution of the palestinian issue, its why we supported the war in iraq and lebanon, its why we will be attacking iran.

one cannot be a neo conservative without being a pro zionist and Blair famously stated that israel has not greater friend than he.


— Delila


israhel, do you have any evidence of anyone 'buying' influence for Israel? Either prove your libel or stop spreading it. Of 30 facts on the Daily Telegraph timeline you chose to highlight Abrahams leaving Labour Friends of Israel in 2000, yet the allegations of donations are 2007.

You are just a smear merchant and your under-lying (!) psyche and prejudices are well-known and documented.
(23) 2007-12-01 03:09:40
Javed: Quote

Poor Labour Party. They find themselves in the middle of a fued between Jon Mendelsohn and David Abrahams. 2 Zionists who fell out with each other when they were both in Labour Friends of Israel. If Gordon Brown had any sense he would sack Mendelsohn. He is a liability because of his enemies.
And Labour Friends of Israel need not worry about losing Mendelsohn. I am sure there is another Labour Friends of Israel memmber who can bcome chief fundraiser to Labour. Israel's interests will always be at forefront.
(24) 2007-12-01 10:51:33
MelanieP: Quote

Poor Labour Party. They find themselves in the middle of a fued between Jon Mendelsohn and David Abrahams. 2 Zionists who fell out with each other when they were both in Labour Friends of Israel. If Gordon Brown had any sense he would sack Mendelsohn. He is a liability because of his enemies.
And Labour Friends of Israel need not worry about losing Mendelsohn. I am sure there is another Labour Friends of Israel memmber who can bcome chief fundraiser to Labour. Israel's interests will always be at forefront.
— Javed


LFI is a small bunch of people. Let's get rid of Labour then and have a Conservative Party where 30% of MP's belong to Conservative Friends of Israel.

Why should political parties suffer because so many Jews are a success and have the money to fund political parties. Surely, if Muslim businessmen were such a succes then they could also provide funding. So where is the "Islamic Lobby"? I suspect still swapping recipes from their restaurants or deciding if its acceptable to support terrorist in the Palestinian areas while donating money to politicians. No politician wants to take money from a terrorist supporter.
(25) 2007-12-01 15:22:42
shan: Quote

well it least they think whether it is acceptable or not to support them whereas israeli lobbies main aim is to support israeli terrorists.
they give money not to help but to cover up the crimes of israeli terrorists.
(26) 2007-12-01 16:45:40
MelanieP: Quote

Oh Look!!

Today's Mail on Sunday reveals that the Labour Party's second biggest donor is Mahoud Khayami who is a French citizen born Iranian, and can't vote.

We should investigate what favours someone with an Islamist background intended to get from the Labour party according to Wendy/Israhel's comment.

Ho! Ho! Ho!
(27) 2007-12-02 10:25:32
Javed: Quote

sorry MelanieP but according to the Labour spokesperson quuoted in all the papers, the hayami donation was legal. 'It was a legal donation.'
His name was on the electoral register, even if it was only hours before he gave the donation. SO HE CAN VOTE.
So you've got no argumnet and please STOP WRITING MISLEADING COMMENTS. You are suppsoed to be a national newspaper columist.
(28) 2007-12-02 10:46:12
MelanieP: Quote

sorry MelanieP but according to the Labour spokesperson quuoted in all the papers, the hayami donation was legal. 'It was a legal donation.'
His name was on the electoral register, even if it was only hours before he gave the donation. SO HE CAN VOTE.
So you've got no argumnet and please STOP WRITING MISLEADING COMMENTS. You are suppsoed to be a national newspaper columist.
— Javed


So we are allowing someone to vote who ONLY joined the electoral register in order to make that donation. Boy, why was he so keen to do so? You have to wonder if it was to promote an Islamist cause.
(29) 2007-12-02 18:55:16
shan: Quote

melaniep said muslims cannot afford to fund labour as they are still looking at their restaurant menu,s.
but when a person who happens to be a muslim gives money to fund labour she says,what islamist cause is he promoting.
she is a hypocrit of the top order and has no morals or scruples about lying and deceiving as ascertained from her comments.
(30) 2007-12-03 10:43:28
you muppet: Quote

Oh Look!!

Today's Mail on Sunday reveals that the Labour Party's second biggest donor is Mahoud Khayami who is a French citizen born Iranian, and can't vote.

We should investigate what favours someone with an Islamist background intended to get from the Labour party according to Wendy/Israhel's comment.

Ho! Ho! Ho!
— MelanieP


Mel P wrong again Khayami is an Iranian Jew.

it seems the Jewish community are being exposed by the press, the question is, what is his stance on Israel and bombing Iran?
(31) 2007-12-03 12:46:07
shan: Quote

the silence is deafening,khayami is a jew,another deceitful lie form melaniep exposed.
(32) 2007-12-03 18:11:43
semite: Quote

Why all the fuss about Labour Friends of Israel? There are a number of "Labour Friends of..." groups supporting Muslim, Arab, Palestinian (as well as just about every other ethnic, religious and national group).

MPAC's comment about the Muslim community organising and involving itself in politics is perplexing given that these groups already exist. Admitedly the work of these groups lobbying on issues of Muslim interest (such as on Palestinian rights, terrorism laws etc) is made more difficult by the elements in the UK (and international) Muslim community who use the cloak of freedom of speech and democratic debate to make (or tolerate) broadly anti-Semitic comments, such as some of those on this thread. Nevertheless, these pro-Muslim groups are no more worrying or more/less influential than groups like LFI.

One person commenting earlier in this thread mentioned that Mendelsohn and Abrahams had fallen out at LFI. While they may both be Jewish, they have quite different views about Israel/Palestine. So seeing this funding scandal as evidence of a dark organised Zionist consipracy would seem to be rather misguided, as it is difficult for any interest group to influence government if it cannot even agree amongst itself; just ask the Muslim Council of Britain. Indeed, it could be argued that seeking to attribute a political view to someone merely because they are born into or practice a particular religion (i.e. every Jewish supporter of Israel is a right wing apologist for Israeli policies) is in itself intolernt and racist.

QED: stop looking for "zionists" under the bed and stand up against this kind of intolerance that effects the Muslim community as much as the Jewish community.
(33) 2007-12-03 18:26:09
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.