Choose Your Region

UK-Region IRELAND-region
MPACUK LEEDS

Adverts/Promotions

Powered by: MuslimPages
 
Halal Hamper CHL Properties When Slaves Become the Masters Journalism Diversity Fund Stop War On Iran

Disclaimer: MPACUK does not select these automated ads.


Subscribe to our newsletter:


Iran calls for US nuclear apology Print E-mail
Friday, 16 November 2007

targetiran.jpgIran calls for US nuclear apology 
 
President Ahmadinejad says Iran's nuclear programme is peaceful
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said the US and its allies should apologise for their treatment of Iran over its nuclear programme.
Mr Ahmadinejad said the latest report by the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) showed Iran had been truthful about its nuclear activities.

The IAEA found Iran had clarified some of its nuclear history but questions remained over present activities.

The US has vowed to push for further UN sanctions in the light of the report.

The IAEA report praised Tehran for making progress in responding to questions about past activities but warned that the agency's knowledge about Tehran's current nuclear programme was diminishing.

It said that Iran was continuing to enrich uranium in defiance of demands by the UN Security Council.

"Selective co-operation" was "not good enough", the White House said after the report's release on Thursday.

Meanwhile, a meeting scheduled for next week to discuss further sanctions against Iran has been cancelled because China has pulled out, diplomats say.

'Political victory'

Iran has portrayed the IAEA's latest findings as a political victory.

"Since the first days, we have declared that Iran's nuclear activities are lawful and in the framework of its legal rights, but the Western countries' propagation networks and political pressures did not allow the Iranians' voice be heard in the world," Mr Ahmadinejad is quoted by state media as saying.

"Now the whole world has seen that the news was not true and Iran's activities have been clean and peaceful and all the main questions of the IAEA have received their appropriate answers."

Q&A: Iran nuclear row 

Mr Ahmadinejad said the time had come for the US and its allies to change their behaviour. "Upon wrong and incorrect information you issued two resolutions," he said, referring to two earlier rounds of UN sanctions.

"Now that you have found out that this information was wrong, you have to be brave and come forward and tell the Iranian nation 'We made a mistake' and apologise."

Weapons fear

While Tehran insists the IAEA report gave it a clean bill of health, the US and its allies fear Iran is developing a nuclear weapons capability.

The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reached a deal in August with Iran, according to which Tehran would answer outstanding questions as part of a four-year probe into its nuclear drive.

Sanctions pressure continues 

"Iran has provided sufficient access to individuals and has responded in a timely manner to questions and provided clarifications and amplifications on issues raised in the context of the work plan," the latest report said.

However, it said Iran's co-operation had been "reactive" rather than "pro-active" and that the IAEA was continuing to check whether Iran's declarations were complete.

The report also found that the agency's knowledge about Tehran's current nuclear programme was diminishing and that Iran had not suspended its uranium enrichment activities as called for by the Security Council.

It says the government had been operating 3,000 centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, at its plant at Natanz.

Sanctions threat

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said: "This report indicates that Iran continues to defy the international community and two unanimous UN Security Council resolutions."

She added that the documents made it "clear that Iran seems uninterested in working with the rest of the world".

Ms Perino said the US planned to work towards a new set of Security Council sanctions with representatives of the five permanent members, along with Germany, at a meeting scheduled for next week in Brussels.

Western powers are concerned because, while enriched uranium is used as fuel for nuclear reactors, highly enriched uranium can also be used to make nuclear bombs.

Two UN Security Council resolutions approved in March imposed limited sanctions on Iran, including a ban on arms sales and restrictions on financial assistance.

In September, council members agreed to delay a vote on further measures until the publication of the current report.

Top Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili said the report proved that accusations against his country were baseless and new sanctions would be wrong.
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Live!Facebook!Technorati!Spurl!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Readers have left 4 comments.
RaviM: Quote

"The IAEA found Iran had clarified some of its nuclear history but questions remained over present activities.

The US has vowed to push for further UN sanctions in the light of the report.

The IAEA report praised Tehran for making progress in responding to questions about past activities but warned that the agency's knowledge about Tehran's current nuclear programme was diminishing.

It said that Iran was continuing to enrich uranium in defiance of demands by the UN Security Council.

"Selective co-operation" was "not good enough", the White House said after the report's release on Thursday"

So the headline spin isn't really the story.

The story is that Iran continues to defy the UN, is secretive and the IAEA is being told less and less.
(1) 2007-11-17 09:10:45
mohsin: Quote

What prevents the IAEA from stopping the USA or the UK having Nuclear Power technology ?

Why the UK ? which has a imperalist PAST, and the USA which currently has a historic past of destroying a civilised Nation- IRAQ, dropping Nuclear Bombs on Japan (WW2), not FORCED to give up their Nuclear marines ?

Why is their only a ONE WAY Policy towards the Iranian Nation ?

Why can Certain NATIONS, have Nuclear Warheads and other Nations cant ? Where is the JUST and FAIRNESS in that ?. Who gave those Nations who have them to exhert their INFLUENCE on other Nations not to have them ? Why such an Imbalance of power their ?

Simple : The Bully RULE applies. The Stronger you are military wise, the more influence you have, the more power you have. With POWER? you will always have challengers, contenders !!!!
(2) 2007-11-17 19:01:55
RaviM: Quote

What prevents the IAEA from stopping the USA or the UK having Nuclear Power technology ?

Why the UK ? which has a imperalist PAST, and the USA which currently has a historic past of destroying a civilised Nation- IRAQ, dropping Nuclear Bombs on Japan (WW2), not FORCED to give up their Nuclear marines ?

Why is their only a ONE WAY Policy towards the Iranian Nation ?

Why can Certain NATIONS, have Nuclear Warheads and other Nations cant ? Where is the JUST and FAIRNESS in that ?. Who gave those Nations who have them to exhert their INFLUENCE on other Nations not to have them ? Why such an Imbalance of power their ?

Simple : The Bully RULE applies. The Stronger you are military wise, the more influence you have, the more power you have. With POWER? you will always have challengers, contenders !!!!
— mohsin


A bit of education for you.

USA and UK already had nuclear weapons by the 1950's.

IAEA formed in 1957 AFTER UAS and UK had nukes.

How come IAEA never prevented Pakistan and North Korea from having nukes?

There is a GOOD Reason why stable countries like USA, UK, France have nukes. Because unstable Russia has them.

Pakistan and India need then so they can have an equal standoff.

Terrorists supporting, other-country-threatening states like Iran must never be allowed to have them because they will use them.

Other countries nukes are required for standoff.

You can't say Iran needs nukes BECAUSE the USA might attack them. The USA has no need to attack Iran if it wasn't trying to get nukes. Its a mutually exclusive argument.

Why does Iran need nuclear powers when it has thousands of years of oil?
(3) 2007-11-18 09:25:36
yeasin ahmed: Quote

What prevents the IAEA from stopping the USA or the UK having Nuclear Power technology ?

Why the UK ? which has a imperalist PAST, and the USA which currently has a historic past of destroying a civilised Nation- IRAQ, dropping Nuclear Bombs on Japan (WW2), not FORCED to give up their Nuclear marines ?

Why is their only a ONE WAY Policy towards the Iranian Nation ?

Why can Certain NATIONS, have Nuclear Warheads and other Nations cant ? Where is the JUST and FAIRNESS in that ?. Who gave those Nations who have them to exhert their INFLUENCE on other Nations not to have them ? Why such an Imbalance of power their ?

Simple : The Bully RULE applies. The Stronger you are military wise, the more influence you have, the more power you have. With POWER? you will always have challengers, contenders !!!!
— RaviM


A bit of education for you.

USA and UK already had nuclear weapons by the 1950's.

IAEA formed in 1957 AFTER UAS and UK had nukes.

How come IAEA never prevented Pakistan and North Korea from having nukes?

There is a GOOD Reason why stable countries like USA, UK, France have nukes. Because unstable Russia has them.

Pakistan and India need then so they can have an equal standoff.

Terrorists supporting, other-country-threatening states like Iran must never be allowed to have them because they will use them.

Other countries nukes are required for standoff.

You can't say Iran needs nukes BECAUSE the USA might attack them. The USA has no need to attack Iran if it wasn't trying to get nukes. Its a mutually exclusive argument.

Why does Iran need nuclear powers when it has thousands of years of oil?
— mohsin


Iran needs nuclear power because it wants to export more crude than it is currently and does not want to rely on the west for its uranium, hence it wants to produce its own. Iran has not attacked another country in the last 300 years. If Iran is as you say looking at developing nuclear weapons than I can see why they might be as they are threatened with war by Israel and the US on an everyday basis.
I look forward to the day when there is more of a balance n power in the ME. Maybe that will bring some semblance of peace to the region for the long term.

(4) 2007-11-20 17:45:24
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.
 
Ireland Branch
Media Workshops

Search MPACUK.org

Recommended Books