Choose Your Region

UK-Region IRELAND-region

MPACUK LEEDS

Adverts/Promotions

Powered by: MuslimPages
 
Kent Muslim Welfare Association Halal Hamper CHL Properties When Slaves Become the Masters Journalism Diversity Fund Stop War On Iran

Disclaimer: MPACUK does not select these automated ads.


Subscribe to our newsletter:


Israel's War on Gaza’s Children Print E-mail
Sunday, 23 September 2007

baby.jpgAn entire generation of Palestinians in Gaza is growing up stunted: physically and nutritionally stunted because they are not getting enough to eat; emotionally stunted because of the pressures of living in a virtual prison and facing the constant threat of destruction and displacement; intellectually and academically stunted because they cannot concentrate — or, even if they can, because they are trying to study and learn in circumstances that no child should have to endure.

Even before Israel this week declared Gaza “hostile territory” — apparently in preparation for cutting off the last remaining supplies of fuel and electricity to 1.5 million men, women and children — the situation was dire.

As a result of Israel’s blockade on most imports and exports and other policies designed to punish the populace, about 70% of Gaza’s workforce is now unemployed or without pay, according to the United Nations, and about 80% of its residents live in grinding poverty. About 1.2 million of them are now dependent for their day-to-day survival on food handouts from U.N. or international agencies, without which, as the World Food Program’s Kirstie Campbell put it, “they are liable to starve.”

An increasing number of Palestinian families in Gaza are unable to offer their children more than one meager meal a day, often little more than rice and boiled lentils. Fresh fruit and vegetables are beyond the reach of many families. Meat and chicken are impossibly expensive. Gaza faces the rich waters of the Mediterranean, but fish is unavailable in its markets because the Israeli navy has curtailed the movements of Gaza’s fishermen.

Los Angeles parents who have spent the last few weeks running from one back-to-school sale to another could do worse than to spare a few minutes to think about their counterparts in the Gaza Strip. As a result of the siege, Gaza is not only short of raw textiles and other key goods but also paper, ink and vital school supplies. One-third of Gaza’s children started the school year missing necessary textbooks. John Ging, the Gaza director of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, whose schools take care of 200,000 children in Gaza, has warned that children come to school “hungry and unable to concentrate.”

Israel says that its policies in Gaza are designed to put pressure on the Palestinian population to in turn put pressure on those who fire crude home-made rockets from Gaza into the Israeli town of Sderot. Those rocket attacks are wrong. But it is also wrong to punish an entire population for the actions of a few — actions that the schoolchildren of Gaza and their beleagueredparents are in any case powerless to stop.

It is a violation of international law to collectively punish more than a million people for something they did not do. According to the Geneva Convention, to which it is a signatory, Israel actually has the obligation to ensure the well-being of the people on whom it has chosen to impose a military occupation for more than four decades.

Instead, it has shrugged off the law. It has ignored the repeated demands of the U.N. Security Council. It has dismissed the International Court of Justice in the Hague. What John Dugard, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied territories, refers to as the “carefully managed” strangulation of Gaza — in full view of an uncaring world — is explicitly part of its strategy. “The idea,” said Dov Weisglass, an Israeli government advisor, “is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not make them die of hunger.”

Saree Makdisi is a professor of English literature at UCLA and the author of “Palestine Inside Out: An Everyday Occupation,” forthcoming from Norton.




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!

Readers have left 18 comments.
JamalA: Quote

"According to the Geneva Convention, to which it is a signatory, Israel actually has the obligation to ensure the well-being of the people on whom it has chosen to impose a military occupation for more than four decades."

Haven't you noticed that Israel withdrew from Gaza over a year ago? Its not occupied by Israel and Israel has no responsibility for it.

Hamas took it over and so we suggest Hamas spend money on food and essentials rather than weapons that they don't need.

Why isn't Egypt opening-up its border with Gaza to let Gazan's go to work?

Perhaps someone could explain what would be the purpose of 'strangling' Gaza? What positive benefit does this bring Israel in the court of Worlf opinion?

The World sees Gaza's situation as one of self-infliction and beligerence of the Palestinians.

Abbas himself stated that he had regeneration billions lined-up for Gaza - and then Hamas started firing rockets and the backers pulled-out.
(1) 2007-09-24 01:40:33
Taz: Quote

JamalA all the readers of this website know that you are a Zionist so let me englighten you with something you are not used to - the truth. Israel is still occupying Gaza even though it's parasitic colonialists are not living there illegally anymore. Israel has not relinquished its illegal claim on the territory and controls the borders. It is recognised by the UN as being the "controling power" and therefore has a legal responsibility towards the people it illegally oppresses - the Palestinians. Now I know Zionists like you can't stand the truth so why do you put down the keyboard and go and become Israel's little soldier for real? Let's see how long you last.
(2) 2007-09-24 09:37:00
RSD: Quote

The problem surely is that the Hamas led Gazan administration is committed to war against Isael and consequently a de-facto state of war exists. Hamas and its allies in Gaza are carrying out acts of aggression against Israeli civilians, including children. It is notable that many critics of Israel are also people that assert that Hamas is the legitimate government of Palestine. As such Hamas has the primary responsibility to be concerned for the welfare of the Palestinian people, and not Israel.
As for opening up the Egyptian border to allow the Gazans to go to work, this is a non-starter because there is practically no work in Egyptian Sinai or across the Suez Canal. Gazans previously went to work in Israel or worked on the Zionist settlements. However in the last 10 years these opportunities have ceased.
Were the Israelis really committed to "strangling" Gaza they would have ended supplies of electricity, water and fuel which they have yet to do. They would have also stopped all supplies of medicines.
If anything the continued supplies of basics into Gaza have allowed the Gazans to avoid the consequences of their actions.
What the Palestinians need desperately is effective government, but before they can achieve this they need to engage in an internal debate about what they want and what the likely consequences will be. If they choose to pursue the destruction of Israel through an existential war, then they must also accept that the Israelis may legitimately respond to that including the total destruction of the Palestinian nation. Alternatively if they wish to create a nation state that is capable fo engaging with all its neighbours in peace, then it must set about establishing the governmental structures that will attain this objective.
What cannot continue is the pretense that firing rockets into Israel are some kind of legitimate act of resistance to which Israel has not right to respond. This concept is at best infantile and indicative of political / social immaturity which would suggest that the Palestinians are not able to manage their own affairs.
(3) 2007-09-24 09:41:27
RSD: Quote

"IN DEFENCE OF JAMALA" - In the first instance everyone should stop using the term Zionist as an insult whenever someone's views do not correspond with their own.
JamalA is correct that the Israelis have ended their occupation of Gaza, and conformed to their obligations under UNSCR 242. The Palestinians could have demonstrated that they could manage their own affairs effectively once the Israelis left. This alone would have bolstered their arguments against the right-wing Zionist claims. Instead they did exactly what Sharon predicted, they disintegrated into factional fighting and gross corruption. Had the Israelis extended this policy of unilateral withdrawal back to the 1949 ceasefire line, what then for the Palestinians? Certainly the Israelis would be under no legal obligation to allow open borders.
There are therefore every real issues to be discussed about the future for Palestine, and insulting each other is not the way forward.
(4) 2007-09-24 10:46:32
JamalA: Quote

RSD is a real treasure for these article comments. Accuracy and eloquence.

I was actually at home on the day that Abbas held a major press conference in front of the Palestinian Parliament. It was shortly after Hamas had killed two children in a jeep on their way to school, belonging to a Fatah leader. It was also a few days after Haniyeh had returned to Gaza with suitcases full of money and he had his 'people' storm the border crossings to make sure the suitcases got through.

Abbas stated that he had arranged billions of dollars for regeneration of Gaza with some Japanese companies but when Hamas started destabilising Gaza and by firing rockets at Israel so the funding was withdrawn.

It is well-documented that Jewish agencies bought the hi-tec greenhouses from Israelis withdrawn from Gaza and handed these to the Palestinians. Result? They were trashed and lie barren. A thriving agriculture was thrown away.

What did Gaza do? Well Hamas and Fatah fought a civil war. Hamas won. Now Gaza is run by Hamas, who you will argue are the legitimate government of the Palestinians. Well GOVERN and stop bleating about it. Those suitcases of money to buy arm could have bought food.

Seems to me that Palestinians PREFER occupation. At least they got fed.
(5) 2007-09-24 11:52:08
JamalA: Quote

Taz,
"the truth. Israel is still occupying Gaza even though it's parasitic colonialists are not living there illegally anymore. Israel has not relinquished its illegal claim on the territory and controls the borders. It is recognised by the UN as being the "controling power" and therefore has a legal responsibility towards the people it illegally oppresses - the Palestinians. "

Now which way do you want to play this?

If Israel has responsibility for Gaza then there is no point in bleating about any Israeli police action to stop Palestinian terrorists. The responsibility you want to ascribe to Israel gives them a LEGITIMATE right and responsibility to quell any un-rest.

It would alos have given them the right to intervene in the Palestinian Civil War.

But the fact is that Israel has left Gaza and it belongs to the Palestinians. Just because they fail to have any ability to manage it just shows what a poor state Palestinians are in.

Funny how if Israel occupies - it gets the blame.

If Israel doesn't occupy - it gets the blame.

BTW, parts of Gaza are historical Jewish places. Israelis were in Gaza as of right.
(6) 2007-09-24 11:59:37
RSD: Quote

JamalA and others
While I seriously doubt that the Palestinians would ever state that they prefered Occupation to the present mess. I do think that there are many who have come to believe their own black propoganda. The consequence is that they are fighting a fiction rather than fact. This is further compounded by journalists claiming that the occupation and other events are breachs of international law. The situation is far more complex. i.e. to determine that Israel illegally occupies territory under int'l law then Israel must exist as a nation state as only nation states can breach int'l law regarding territory. As in 1967 the members of the Arab League denied Israels legitimacy Israel cannot therefore have occupied the territories in the eyes of the Arab League. Thus the Arab League is caught in a cleft stick - if it were to take Israel to the Int'l Court then it would have to recognise the 1949 Israeli borders.
Unless we recognise this complexity, we can never devise strategies to combat Zionism or whatever other political impulses we oppose. Therefore we are doomed to repeated failure.
(7) 2007-09-24 12:50:01
JamalA: Quote

JamalA and others
While I seriously doubt that the Palestinians would ever state that they prefered Occupation to the present mess. I do think that there are many who have come to believe their own black propoganda. The consequence is that they are fighting a fiction rather than fact. This is further compounded by journalists claiming that the occupation and other events are breachs of international law. The situation is far more complex. i.e. to determine that Israel illegally occupies territory under int'l law then Israel must exist as a nation state as only nation states can breach int'l law regarding territory. As in 1967 the members of the Arab League denied Israels legitimacy Israel cannot therefore have occupied the territories in the eyes of the Arab League. Thus the Arab League is caught in a cleft stick - if it were to take Israel to the Int'l Court then it would have to recognise the 1949 Israeli borders.
Unless we recognise this complexity, we can never devise strategies to combat Zionism or whatever other political impulses we oppose. Therefore we are doomed to repeated failure.
— RSD


I'm not sure why anyone would wish to 'combat Zionism'. Zionism is simply the support for Jews to be re-established as a Nation. In furtherance of that cause it extends to the protection of the National home it already has.

Zionist have no policy of denial that the Palestinians also deserve to have a national home too.

After the 'Palestinians' were surrendered by Jordan and Egypt after the 1967 war it was obvious that they needed a national identity too. Israel and Zionists support that.

Let's face it. Israel doesn't want to be responsible for any control over the Palestinians. What would Israel gain by doing that?

The borders of Israel should be defined by the post-war position of 1967 with adjustments of land versus security.

The media have played a big part in maintaining the conflict. As the 30th September anniversary of the Mohammed Al Dura 'shooting' is upon us it is worth realising that the whole thing was a fake designed to demonise Israel and spur the Intifada.
(8) 2007-09-24 13:18:51
RSD: Quote

JamalA,
I am guilty of the sins I accuse others of. We need to combat that form of Zionism that seeks to deny the Palestinians the right of self-determination. We need also to combat that form of Zionism which legitimises military action as a form of imperialism. It is not behaviour peculiar to Zionists but nevertheless it is reprehensible and something contrary to the ideals of the founders of the State of Israel. Inexactitude in relation to the useage of the term Zionism is a fault that many of us are guilty of.
The Palestinians started to develop a national identity by the late 1950's and this subsequently developed via the PLO. However all comments about this need to be understood in the context that nationalism is relatively new to the Middle East, and most of the world. Prior to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire people tended to define themselves according to religion as they had done for millenia. As we can see from current developments in the Palestinian territories, relgion, tribe and clan are still far more compelling than national identity. It may be said that both Fatah and Hamas have basically sought to turn the clock back to the pre-Tanzimat era where clan hierarchy and religion primarily determines status. As we can see this strategy does not augur well for a future Palestinian state.
(9) 2007-09-24 19:15:07
JamalA: Quote

JamalA,
I am guilty of the sins I accuse others of. We need to combat that form of Zionism that seeks to deny the Palestinians the right of self-determination. We need also to combat that form of Zionism which legitimises military action as a form of imperialism. It is not behaviour peculiar to Zionists but nevertheless it is reprehensible and something contrary to the ideals of the founders of the State of Israel. Inexactitude in relation to the useage of the term Zionism is a fault that many of us are guilty of.
The Palestinians started to develop a national identity by the late 1950's and this subsequently developed via the PLO. However all comments about this need to be understood in the context that nationalism is relatively new to the Middle East, and most of the world. Prior to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire people tended to define themselves according to religion as they had done for millenia. As we can see from current developments in the Palestinian territories, relgion, tribe and clan are still far more compelling than national identity. It may be said that both Fatah and Hamas have basically sought to turn the clock back to the pre-Tanzimat era where clan hierarchy and religion primarily determines status. As we can see this strategy does not augur well for a future Palestinian state.
— RSD


Well the first one is done since Israel recognises the right of self-determination and statehood for Palestinians.

Zionism does not define itself as 'military imperialism'. That means to take what you want by force. Israel has given back - not taken. They gave back under Res 242 and they gave back Gaza. To be militarily strong is a necessity to maintain Israel.

You are right that there is no single Palestinian movement that can rally Palestinians to a single cause. Their error was electing Hamas and now they realise it. To vote Hamas was a positive vote for statehood by agression and terrorism instead of negotiation as supported by the World.

They lost a positive World opinion when they made that mistake. Now they have lost Gaza too.
(10) 2007-09-24 20:24:58
RSD: Quote

JamaalA,
Zionism is not a single cogent entity which possesses a single strategy. It is a range of ideas which share only the concept of a Jewish nation state. There are imperialist / colonialist Zionists as there liberal internationalist Zionists, and every shade of poltics in between.
The Palestinians did not make a mistake voting for Hamas. They made the mistake of not having a wide and deep debate about the consequences of voting for any of the parties. They also made the mistake of listening to their so-called friends around the world, and failing to recognise that these friends have been using them for decades.
BTW Israel did not quit Gaza under 242, it simply quit. Perhaps you should read UNSCR242. You are not alone in this most peopkle who quote have never read it either, and thus what they state is wrong.
(11) 2007-09-24 20:45:06
JamalA: Quote

RSD, I know Res 242 chapter and verse - even though its quite short. I could probably quote it verbatim as I've discussed and debated it for over 10 years (you wouldn't know that).

The reference to 242 can be made because its a unilateral withdrawl from 'territory occupied in the recent conflict' in order to withdraw to 'secure boundaries'. It is just missing the 'recognised' bit but I believe the International Community recognises Israel isn't in Gaza and that its border is adjacent to it.

Its an argument that can be made both ways.

I agree that the Palestinians have been used by the Arab nations who use them to attack Israel by proxy. Demonising Israel maintains the popularity of corrupt regimes in Egypt, Saudi and Jordan.
(12) 2007-09-24 22:49:43
Alex, USA: Quote

As long as America remains a puppet in the hands of the war criminals (Zionists, Israel, and the Israeli Lobbies), there will be no peace in the Middle East. We must kick the Fifth Column of Israel out of America so that we can save millions of innocent lives of Americans and the people of the Middle East.
(13) 2007-09-25 00:17:16
RSD: Quote

JamaalA, I disagree with your perspective. 242 is an instrument designed so that the withdrawal from the "Territories" should occur in concert with the Recognition of Israel as a nation state by the Arab League beligerents. Neither should occur without the other.
Oslo basically ignored 242, with the assent of the Israelis and Palestinians, and set aside the recognition of Israel by the Arab League.
Unilateralism exists outside of either 242 or Oslo, and it an act by Israel without reference to any interests other than its own. It was also a signifiacent challenge to the Palestinians as it provided them an opportunity to demonstrate that in the absence of the IDF they could govern themselves effectively and behave as neighbourly nation state. Sadly they have failed, as Sharon probably expected. The "Friends of Palestine" around the world failed the Palestinians at this crucial moment by failing to provide positive criticism to help them establisht he beginnings of an effective state.
It is interesting that the Israelis have not pursued unilateralism as it would give them far more freedom of action than they currently have. It suggests that fundamentally they are committed to a negotiated settlement ending in positive relations between them and the Palestinians. A point missed by many.
(14) 2007-09-25 08:16:31
JamalA: Quote

As long as America remains a puppet in the hands of the war criminals (Zionists, Israel, and the Israeli Lobbies), there will be no peace in the Middle East. We must kick the Fifth Column of Israel out of America so that we can save millions of innocent lives of Americans and the people of the Middle East.
— Alex, USA


Quite, and we must stop a Fifth Column from forming in the UK.

Oh, I see the Government already has by dropping the Muslim Council of Britain who tried to blackmail the Government over Foreign Policy.

We can't allow a tiny minority of people in the UK to dictate to us. I am sure you will agree.
(15) 2007-09-25 10:59:02
JamalA: Quote

"Cardinal Cerejeira, Patriarch of Lisbon, Portugal, April 24, 1959"

What! 1959?

Got anything more recent, mildly relevant?

Jose Murinho, Portugese, 2006 "I am the Special One"
(16) 2007-09-25 12:10:21
arial sharon (no relation): Quote

Zionism Is The Real Enemy Of The Jews

One again the survivors of the Shoah
(holocast) are inflicting on the palestinians the same treatment that the Nazis and the Gestapo inflicted on them, Dov Weisglass is repeating what the Nazis said to the League of Nations/IRC Special Committees when asked about the Nazi State's violations of systematic starving the Jews and Poles in WW11
(17) 2007-09-26 17:28:46
JamalA: Quote

Zionism Is The Real Enemy Of The Jews

One again the survivors of the Shoah
(holocast) are inflicting on the palestinians the same treatment that the Nazis and the Gestapo inflicted on them, Dov Weisglass is repeating what the Nazis said to the League of Nations/IRC Special Committees when asked about the Nazi State's violations of systematic starving the Jews and Poles in WW11
— arial sharon (no relation)


I'm not sure what your are saying here. Is this some suggestion that some 80 year-old Israelis are strutting about in Nazi uniforms and playing "Who's been a bad boy".

I just don't get it.

Is it some Pallywood film you saw?

References please.
(18) 2007-09-26 19:20:03
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.
 
Media Workshops

Search MPACUK.org

Recommended Books