Choose Your Region

UK-Region IRELAND-region

MPACUK LEEDS

Adverts/Promotions

Powered by: MuslimPages
 
Kent Muslim Welfare Association Halal Hamper CHL Properties When Slaves Become the Masters Journalism Diversity Fund Stop War On Iran

Disclaimer: MPACUK does not select these automated ads.


Subscribe to our newsletter:


Murdering of Muslims justified by Law ? Print E-mail
Thursday, 08 June 2006

As  Iraq allies hail Zarqawi killing Many of the “collateral” killings get no mention or get reported in a matter-of-fact way and brushed under the carpet as if they are insignificant. 

“Five other people were killed in the raid, including spiritual adviser Sheikh Abd-al-Rahman and an unidentified woman and child"

With two 500lb (230kg) bombs in a civilian area they expect us to believe that only a 6 people were killed?? One wonders whether they got their training from the IDF who casually target civilian areas with air to ground missiles and kill many innocent people when trying to illegally assassinate a representative of a democratically elected government .

Murders of Muslims are covered up or legitimised by the perpetrators or their governments. The murderers are not only pardoned but congratulated on a job well done. 

When all these indiscriminate murders of Muslims go on under the “civilised” world’s nose is it difficult to imagine why more and More Muslims are getting angered and frustrated over the whole situation. They are not able to do much because their governments silence them and even detain and torture them instead of listening to them and trying to resolve their frustrations so we see people lose the will to live and when it gets to that stage then it has already become a dangerous situation.

Just look at the stories mentioned below to see how the victims are treated like evildoers and how the oppressors are made to look like the morally high saints that can do no wrong.

This story about the  MoD investigating Iraq shooting  is a sad example of injustice.

First we see this: The spokesman also said the British troops on the ground reported that two teenage boys had been hit.  He said: "We are aware of reports that a 13-year-old has been killed.  Then surprise surprise, all of a sudden there is  'No evidence' of shot Iraqi boy' .

When we see what the invaders are capable, nobody can blame us for sensing another cover-up. Nobody gets the real picture, only a sanitised and modified version of events.

Even stark evidence and video footage is not enough for the crusaders to admit they committed a massacre. When the US probes new Iraq massacre claim guess what the result is?

“The video tape obtained by the BBC shows a number of dead adults and children at the site with what our world affairs editor John Simpson says were clearly gunshot wounds.”

The pattern of reporting is always the same. A story leaks out such as the one explaining that the Killing of Iraqi may have been 'premeditated' but as usual it is covered up or brushed aside for more propaganda whilst the perpetrators or murderers are excused.

The list is endless, here are a few more examples: Troops cleared of Iraq wrongdoing or Troops cleared over Iraq drowning.

It is not as if the world doesn’t know about these events it’s just that they have sinister skeletons in their own to hide such as how Europe aided US in CIA flights.'

 But as Paul Adams so eloquently writes for the BBC, the Army verdict throws up questions

“But while the soldiers have their supporters, there is an equally vociferous camp that says the military should not be responsible for investigating itself.”.....

“The British Army, some argue, is getting away with murder in Iraq - civilian courts should be responsible for getting at the truth.”

After all the barbarism Muslims are faced with they are expected to be silent and sit back without a squeak whilst they watch their brethren get slaughtered. Sadly most are doing what they are expected to.

We need to speak up and put a stop to this. Join MPAC to learn how. 




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!

Readers have left 12 comments.
AK: Quote

Salaamz. Is the killing of Zarqawi really that big a success? One wonders that with the world's most powerful Superpower in history was at the task and it took them 3 years to eliminate such an advisory, is that really a cause to go ecstatic over? And for those who claim otherwise, then they are automaitcally implying that the network of Al-Zarqawi, and indirectly the Al-Qaeda is much more sophisticated and robust than that of the United States? Not to mentioin that there was the requirement of the 2 500 lbs bombs for the success of the mission.

Even with satellite guided technology there were casualties. There is no excuse for this - with the claim of the high precision of these weapons of mass destruction by the US. There have been boasts of the technology used in the US military applications, and still they expect to be let off on the high number of casualties. Either they are the elite super military power that they claim they are and there should be NO collateral damages because of their technological superiority and military might, or they should admit that even with all these technological advances they are not that much better than the terrorists since both seem to be killing off the same amount of innocents, and hence should not have gone into the war with such high expectations in the first place. Atleast then it would be understandable that there were such high number of collaterals because - you know they are not perfect.But to give the impression of such might and perfection, and then to also demand sympathy and to be let off for the high number of casualties in the warfare is like having the cake for themselves as well.

Don't get me wrong - I'm not nagging, I'm just criticising on what was promised by the US in the first place. They promised of being quite the might, and yet 3 years on the soldiers are actually fighting for their survival. The reason why there is such jubilation on the killing of Al- Zarqawi is because the US did not expect enduring such a tough time after the initial fall of the regime, from such a puny defence. That's the main reason of jubilation, because Iraq still isn't any closer to governing itself without the presence of the occupying forces than it was after the fall of the regime, even with the so called election of the first democratic government of Iraq, as terms are still dictated to them by the occupying forces. What sort of democracy the West want the Middle East to embrace God alone knows, since the democracy of Palestine is rejected, but the monarchs of Saudi Arabis and Jordan are accepted by the same democracy loving West . . .
(1) 2006-06-09 00:10:57
jamal: Quote

Aparantly, the lives of Muslims do not count when USA plays its game of trying to decieve the world into thinking it is doing a good job in Iraq!
(2) 2006-06-09 00:16:27
joe: Quote

Why was a child being kept in a militant safe house?Why is it that Isamic militants use children as shields?
(3) 2006-06-09 01:22:05
PZ: Quote

Look at the New York Times. They have satellite photos of the house that was bombed. It was in an isolated stretch of road just outside of a town.

It's indeed sad that this woman and child were killed and it is indeed being underplayed by the media.

However, it's a bit rich of you guys to talk about murderers of Muslims when talking about Abu Musab Zarqawi, who was a mass-murderer of Muslims and Arabs. His murders (not to mention his incitement and tirades against Shiites) were disgusting.
(4) 2006-06-09 03:01:22
jay: Quote

And the collateral damage in the terrorists car bombings? they don't count, supposedly?
(5) 2006-06-09 07:02:25
Rajesh: Quote

Tying children to US / israeli military vehicles, hiding behind children then shooting, planting bombs in nightclubs (as seen in Germany), actively going after children to satisfy its lust (zeal or religious teachings),etc are all examples of zionist jews history, its has the blood of Humanity on its hands. It has no boundaries it will cross to satisfy it blood lust.
(6) 2006-06-09 11:16:15
Abdul Rahman: Quote

Rajesh - you forgot to blame the 'zionists' for the slave trade, poisoning wells, using children's blood for matzah, the Bam earthquake, aids and global warming.

Do people realise what damage those like Rajesh and Bilal Patel do to the Palestinian cause by association? My only comfort it they appear (at least from their names and what one can gather about their lifestyles) not to be Muslims, but the Muslims should be very wary of them.
(7) 2006-06-09 13:52:57
Truth: Quote

It has been reported that 3 innocent women were killed on the bbc.
(8) 2006-06-09 15:11:32
Red: Quote

The Wall Street Journal and the US military now report that a child was, in fact, not killed in this bombing.

There were three women and three men killed. Presumably, they were associated with each other, otherwise they would not have been in the same house. It sounds cold, but there are always risks when you take a renegade with a $25 million bounty into your home.

My question is: why can't you give some captions/source to your photos, MPACUK?
(9) 2006-06-09 15:23:13
Abdul: Quote

Why did it take 3 years to kill Zarqawi? could it be that at other times it may have caused alot more loss of innocent life ? If you are gonna sup with the devil , then be alert to consequences . This Martyr ?? killed more Muslims than Israelis , so you tell me how should he be remembered ?
(10) 2006-06-10 04:42:05
Rajesh: Quote

The truth is SO very painful eh "abdul"!!
(11) 2006-06-10 12:32:31
S. Benari: Quote

AK raises a very interesting point about what the West expects. However I would turn that on its head and ask what is expected of the West. On one hand it is criticised if it cooperates with brutal dictators, and on the other it is damned if it tries to impose deomocracy on societies.

The real question we should be asking is why the Iraqis in the case cannot coalesce beyond the boundaries of tribe and sect to form a cohesive society? The difficulty in answering that question is that it inherently poses additional questions about the degree to which we are all complicit in the maintain of a high degree of delusion about the nature of the Middle Eastern societies.

In relation to the Wests response to the outcome of the Palestinian elections, it is our expectation that needs to be questioned. Hamas was voted in on its manifesto, based on its charter. On the basis of that the entire peace process is terminated, and thus the Quartet has no further role. The manifesto is also an implicit revocation of Resolution 242 as a basis for peace. As the Wests entire approach is based upon the PNA (Hamas or Fatah( accepting the need for a final peace treaty being drawn up in which both Israel and Palestine exists for the foreseeable future. Hamas's offer of Hudna simply fails to meet those expectations.

The only surprising element in all of this is the expectation amongst some people that the West would carry business as usual with the newly elected PNA.
(12) 2006-06-12 18:40:05
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.
 
Media Workshops

Search MPACUK.org

Recommended Books